On 1 Mar 2017, at 11:55, Mark Vitale wrote:
>> On Mar 1, 2017, Dave Botsch wrote:
>>
>> How would one go about building OpenAFS as such? Any
>> documentation someplace?
>>
>
> To enable butc to use the TSM XBSA APIs, specify:
>
> configure —enable-tivoli-tsm
>
> Sorry, I
You need to have the TSM libraries/headers present in your build environment
in order for the functionality to be properly linked in.
We use it for multiple cells at MIT, and certainly the latest 1.6
releases work fine. (I don't think we've tried with 1.8.0 alpha 1
yet.)
-Ben
On Wed, Mar 01,
Sounds like the most recent TSM patches may or may not be in the OpenAFS
tree?
Are you aware of any reason that this api is not enabled by default? I
believe it would be a huge win for OpenAFS to be able to advertise
native TSM support.
Thanks.
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:55:25PM +, Mark
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 11:32 AM, Dave Botsch wrote:
>
> How would one go about building OpenAFS as such? Any documentation
> someplace?
>
To enable butc to use the TSM XBSA APIs, specify:
configure —enable-tivoli-tsm
Sorry, I have no other details or OpenAFS
How would one go about building OpenAFS as such? Any documentation
someplace?
Thanks.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:02:05PM -0500, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> Few are aware that OpenAFS can be built to support IBM TSM as a virtual
> tape controller via the XBSA API. AWS S3 could be added in a similar