Congrats to you and the team on 1.8.10 !!
On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 07:28:02PM +0200, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
> The OpenAFS Release Team is pleased to announce the availability of OpenAFS
> version 1.8.10 for UNIX/Linux. Source files can be accessed via the web at
>
>
I'm generally in favor of considering this a bug and fixing it.
Thanks!
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 04:21:12PM -0400, Jeffrey E Altman wrote:
> On 7 March Andrew Deason submitted a patch to OpenAFS documenting the
> existing behavior of the OpenAFS fileserver when computing Anonymous and
> Caller
What's the best way to determine appropriate -cb numbers for
fileservers? And is there a max that is "bad" like with -p ?
Note I'm still on 1.6 servers at the moment, which might change the
answers to the above.
thanks.
--
David William Botsch
I suspect our user deprovisioning scripts would break by trying to
explicitly remove users from those groups. Though would be easy enough
to fix. And I'm in favor of having this extra output.
Two questions/thoughts would be:
1) If this is a "backwards-incompatible" change (is it?) should it be
Not surprised that they patched something useful in. And it is a useful
option.
thanks
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 12:40:57PM -0700, Carson Gaspar wrote:
> This is a Red Hat patch: openssh-7.7p1-gssapi-new-unique.patch
>
> On 7/11/2022 12:26 PM, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> &
Yup, I see that that option is not there on rhel6 with
openssh-server-5.3p1-124.el6_10.x86_64
so must be a new option. And something that was clearly handled
differently on RHEL6.
thanks!
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 09:26:54PM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Dave Botsch:
>
> >
and if using sssd what's in sssd.conf for kerberos.
Thanks.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 07:54:12PM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Dave Botsch:
>
> > KerberosUniqueCCache=yes in sshd.conf
>
> Could you elaborate on what this option is good for? I can't find it in
> sshd_config(5)
Since we are not using PAGs anymore on most of our systems and instead
using UID based logins for tokens, I should retest and see what does and
doesn't work with keyrings as I honestly don't recall at this point, and
things have changed with the various point releases of RHEL8. One of the
We went back to using FILE based caches for use along with PAGs.
Something didn't work right with keyring caches, and I don't recall
what.
I believe our general path was, keyring didn't work, ok, go to file
based. Now get sssd and pam_afs_session working properly and work around
the krb5-1.18
I think all we had to do, actually, was set appropriate options for
GSSAPI in sshd_config ... and make sure it was still using PAM for the
account and session pieces.
We did not have to use any stashcred or chuse stuff... our session stack
looks like:
session optional
In our case, we use multiple kerberos domains to authenticate users.
So in pam.d/password-auth...
authsufficient pam_sss.so
forward_pass
then lets sssd take care of figuring out via an ldap lookup, which
kerberos domain to authenticate the user
I wanted to mention that we are successfully doing ssh and gnome-shell
logins with pam_sssd where sssd takes care of authN via kerberos and via
ldap provides group information, and pam_afs_session to get afs tokens.
Two difficulties... if using PAGSHs, not all processes run inside a
pagsh, which
better than they were a few
years ago. For GSOC, the Foundation has spun up an OpenAFS slack
instance, so that would be one useful tool for a Hackathon.
Please reply back with your thoughts, comments, and feedback.
Thank you, and stay healthy!
Dave Botsch,
OpenAFS Foundation, Inc. board member
ies to you.
We are looking forward to your registrations and to your actual
attendance at the conference; it is promising to become an exciting
event. Until then, get/be well…
Dave Botsch, on behalf of:
Margarete
Secretary of the Board
OpenAFS Foundation,
of cfp. Thank you.
We are hoping that many of you will still turn in proposals. There are
plenty of good reasons to do so, the most prominent of which is: this
Workshop will be as enriching and exciting as YOU make it! __
Best Spring wishes,
Dave Botsch, on behalf of
Margarete Ziemer, Secretary
The 2022 AFS Technologies Workshop is a community based effort to
promote the stability and growth of the AFS distributed file system and
related technologies.
The workshop will be three half day workshops from 10 AM Eastern US time
June 14-16, 2022, held virtually.
We believe that all members
OpenAFS has been selected as a Google Summer of Code 2022 mentor
organization.
The list of accepted 2022 GSoC mentoring organizations will be published
March 07, 2022 at 18:00 UTC at https://g.co/gsoc.
That website appears to be overwhelmed at the moment, and Google is
working on a fix.
Those
Here's a beta version of our webpage that we'll be posting with our
project ideas:
https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/meffie/openafs-web/blob/gsoc-2022/gsoc/project-ideas.html
Comments and suggestions welcome!
--
David William Botsch
All,
Google Summer of Code is a global, online program focused on
bringing new contributors into open source software development.
GSoC Contributors work with an open source organization on a 12+
week programming project under the guidance of mentors.
And the
In past years, OpenAFS has pariticpated in the Google Summer of Code.
It's a good opportunity to raise awareness of the OpenAFS project and
recruit potential new folk in addition to getting some fun code out of
it.
The OpenAFS Foundation would like to propose that we apply to the
program and that
/registration/
Those who are speaking do not need to register separately.
thanks!
On behalf of the OpenAFS Foundation Board,
-Dave Botsch
--
David William Botsch
Programmer/Analyst
@CornellCNF
bot...@cnf.cornell.edu
Hi, AFS community!
A reminder that the deadline to submit proposed talks for this year's
*Virtual* AFS Technologies Workshop to be held June 14-16 is May 5.
If you submitted a proposed talk last year, we hope that you will
re-submit this year. And all accepted speakers will have their
Friendly reminder... submit your talk ideas! Especially if you submitted
a talk idea last year, we'd love to hear from you with an updated talk
proposal this year!
And presenters have the registration fee waived!
More info and howto submit:
https://workshop.openafs.org/afsbpw21/cfp/
Thanks!
Call for Talks and Activities - May 1 Deadline
The 2021 AFS Technologies Workshop is a community based effort to
promote the stability and growth of the AFS distributed file system and
related technologies.
The workshop will be three half day workshops from 10 AM Eastern time
June 14-16, 2021,
On behalf of the OpenAFS Foundation Board...
The Foundation is announcing the 2021 AFS Technologies Workshop.
This will be a *virtual* workshop focusing on all things AFS and related
technologies. Operators, developers, and enthusiasts should attend!
The workshop will be held June 14-16,
Help us celebrate! Twenty years ago, on October 31, 2000, the OpenAFS project
was created by a small group of individuals at Carnegie Mellon University, with
its corpus owing to the generosity of IBM. In their release, IBM cast forth a
largely complete version of its AFS 3.6 source tree
Save the Date!
The 2021 AFS Technologies Workshop is scheduled for June 14-16, 2021 at
the Ohio State University campus in Columbus, Ohio.
While disappointed that COVID-19 prevented a 2020 workshop, we are
looking forward to a workshop in 2021.
Stay tuned to this list and to the workshop
Because of issues arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, the OpenAFS
Foundation, Inc Board has decided to cancel the 2020 AFS Technologies Workshop.
We hope to be back in 2021 for a workshop. Stay safe, everyone!
-Dave Botsch, on behalf of the OpenAFS Foundation, Inc. Board
Hi, all.
The list of accepted talks for the 2020 AFS Technologies Workshop is on
on the workshop website:
http://workshop.openafs.org/afsbpw20/talks/
(you may need to refresh your web browser for the most current list).
Thanks to Mike Meffie and Jeff Hutzelman for getting the website up.
And
Last call... end of day, today, please.
Also note the website is up and registration is open at
workshop.openafs.org .
Talks will be announced the following week by February 22.
Please send your proposals for consideration to
openafs.works...@gmail.com with the subject 2020 cfp.
The 2020 AFS
So that we can announce talks with time for attendees to make travel
plans, we have moved the Call for Talks deadline to *February 15* .
Talks will be announced the following week by February 22.
Please send your proposals for consideration to
openafs.works...@gmail.com with the subject 2020 cfp.
March 15.
Thanks
On November 13, 2019 17:29:40 Walter Tienken wrote:
This is exciting! When does CFP end?
Walter Tienken
walter.tien...@asu.edu
Cloud and Advanced Network Engineering Services
From: openafs-info-ad...@openafs.org on
behalf of Dave Botsch
Sent: Wednesday, November 13
The 2020 AFS Technologies Workshop is a community based effort to
promote the stability and growth of the AFS distributed file system and
related technologies. The workshop takes place Monday, June 15 -
Wednesday, June 17 in Columbus, OH at Ohio State University.
We believe that all members of
The 2019 workshop held in Pittsburgh was a huge success. Thanks to the
speakers who gave fun informative talks. And thanks to everyone who
attended.
And we're already planning for next year -- June 15-17, 2020 in Columbus
OH at Ohio State University.
Thanks!
--
Lots of exciting talks, including...
• Native Mountpoints on Linux
• How to Saturate a 10GbE Link with an OpenAFS Rx Fileserver
• Overcoming Ubik Limitations
• Deploying OpenAFS Cells using Ansible
• Cross-cell Volume Sync with CellCC
• A Robot Framework Test Suite for OpenAFS
• Static analysis
Registration is live. Please visit:
https://openafs-workshop.org/2019/registration/
Early bird pricing ends May 15 for single day and May 28 for the full
workshop. Seating is limited overall this year, so register now!
If your org is planning on sponsoring the conference, some sponsorship
The OpenAFS Workshop is a community based effort to promote the
stability and growth of the AFS distributed file system and related
technologies. The workshop takes place Wednesday, June 19 - Friday, June
21 in Pittsburgh, PA at the Hyatt House Pittsburgh South Side.
We believe that all members
Are folk better able to attend a July 10-12 conference?
Thanks.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 09:55:11AM -0400, Dave Botsch wrote:
> The OpenAFS Foundation is proposing hosting a conference at the Hyatt
> House Pittsburgh South Side in Pittsburgh, PA on June 18 - June 21,
> 2019. The confere
The OpenAFS Foundation is proposing hosting a conference at the Hyatt
House Pittsburgh South Side in Pittsburgh, PA on June 18 - June 21,
2019. The conference would target AFS admins, developers, and users at
all levels with the overall goal of promoting AFS knowledge and
learning, participation,
I should add we did successfully use Win7 Pro with the same setup. With
10, we made sure to get all to Enterprise instead of Pro.
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:36:30PM +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am 06.03.19 um 16:59 schrieb Dave Botsch:
>
> > I'm curious what problems you have
Neither. Enterprise.
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:36:30PM +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am 06.03.19 um 16:59 schrieb Dave Botsch:
>
> > I'm curious what problems you have run into. We are bouncing Win10
> > against MIT Kerberos just fine, so clearly something is different in
Hi.
I'm curious what problems you have run into. We are bouncing Win10
against MIT Kerberos just fine, so clearly something is different in our
attempted setups.
Thanks.
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 04:51:09PM +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am 06.03.19 um 14:28 schrieb Ciprian Dorin Craciun:
>
> >
made here at NCSU that I heavily modified. I will try to upload those to a
> yum repo as soon as I fix my selinux issues.
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:10 PM Dave Botsch wrote:
>
> > Did you use the downloadable srpm from openafs.org ?
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019
Did you use the downloadable srpm from openafs.org ?
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:58:22PM -0500, Gary Gatling wrote:
> I was able to get 1.8.2 to compile for RHEL 8 x86_64 but "kinit" seems to
> be missing. :(
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:23 PM Dave Botsch wrote:
&g
Has anyone gotten openafs to compile under RHEL8 beta? I had tried
previously and no gold. If so, one could then test and again file a bug
report with RedHat saying "systemd --user breaks stuff" and here's the
business case.
Thanks.
On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 10:34:40AM +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Uusually I grab the .src.rpm , rebuild it, and then push the generated
binaries to our machines.
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 04:46:46PM +, Sebby, Brian A. wrote:
> Previous releases have included source RPMs that made it easier for us to
> build RPMs to deploy to our Red Hat-based servers. I
All,
On behalf of the OpenAFS Foundation Board of Directors, I am pleased to
announce that the OpenAFS initiative including any paid or volunteer
software development is now covered by Errors and Omissions insurance.
This is a big step forward and now allows contributions of code without
major
nager windows.
>
> Thanks again,
> Giovanni
>
> On 28/11/2017 05:48, Dave Botsch wrote:
> >Does the integrated login pop up a fail error msg? If so, what?
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >
> >On November 27, 2017 15:05:54 Giovanni Bracco
> ><
r ..." with the message "Credential could not be obtained for cell
> ...". However, after closing the popup message, I can see that I
> have obtained the ticket in the Network Identity Manager windows.
>
> Thanks again,
> Giovanni
>
> On 28/11/2017 05:48, Dave Botsch
he cell name. However, you can find the screenshot
> in attached.
>
> Regards,
> Giovanni
>
> On 28/11/2017 20:28, Dave Botsch wrote:
> >Hi.
> >
> >What's the full message that is displayed (screenshot) ?
> >
> >That sometimes gives an error code or me
al could not be obtained for cell
> ...". However, after closing the popup message, I can see that I
> have obtained the ticket in the Network Identity Manager windows.
>
> Thanks again,
> Giovanni
>
> On 28/11/2017 05:48, Dave Botsch wrote:
> >Does the int
Does the integrated login pop up a fail error msg? If so, what?
Thanks.
On November 27, 2017 15:05:54 Giovanni Bracco wrote:
hello!
we are trying to install and configure OpenAFS client on a Windows
Server machine (vers. 2012 R2 build 9600 x86_64).
We have
Jason,
On behalf of the Foundation Board and of myself, thanks for all the time
and work you've put in keeping the Buildbot system going. This effort
has been invaluable to keeping the OpenAFS effort moving forward.
Again, thank you!
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 09:40:42AM -0500, Jason Edgecombe
Without an infusion of money and/or interested developers, OpenAFS will
certainly have a rough go of it.
I'm hoping we can shortly start fundraising... if each organization
denotes at least $1K... that goes a LONG way towards paying one or more
folk to work on stuff.
Thanks.
On Tue, Oct 31,
Here at CNF... for Windows 10, we are deploying 1.7.3301 along with MIT
Kerberos.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:45:48AM +0100, Toby Blake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Orpheus' Lyre vulnerability has thrown up a few questions with respect
> to AFS clients on windows. Apologies if these are a little vague,
.umu.se/lap/tsmpipe/x.x/src/
> >
> > Used with some scripts do put vos dumps into TSM archive. This is the
> > current backup solution for at least 3 AFS cells I know about.
> >
> > Harald.
>
> There is also LTU's tsmafs which is available on GitHub
>
> https://gi
Vitale wrote:
>
> > On Mar 1, 2017, at 11:32 AM, Dave Botsch <bot...@cnf.cornell.edu> wrote:
> >
> > How would one go about building OpenAFS as such? Any documentation
> > someplace?
> >
>
> To enable butc to use the TSM XBSA APIs, specify:
>
> co
How would one go about building OpenAFS as such? Any documentation
someplace?
Thanks.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:02:05PM -0500, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> Few are aware that OpenAFS can be built to support IBM TSM as a virtual
> tape controller via the XBSA API. AWS S3 could be added in a similar
my servers could easily host
> another afs domain.
>
>
> From: openafs-info-ad...@openafs.org <openafs-info-ad...@openafs.org> on
> behalf of Dave Botsch <bot...@cnf.cornell.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 10:22:54 AM
> To: op
Hi, Ted et al.
Please see below...
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:25:35PM +, Ted Creedon wrote:
> I just happen to have a spare dual xeon 64gb linux box that could be made
> available.
> and smaller MAC w/ parallels on it.
>
> I also have a dual 64gb xeon w/ a xeon phi card in it too. cost
It sounds like running the salvagedirs would result in the next incremental
dump being equiv in size to doing a full dump?
Thanks
David William Botsch
Programmer/Analyst
@CNFComputing
bot...@cnf.cornell.edu
On December 7,
>
> > We tried an install of OpenAFS for Windows 1.7.31 from the openafs.org
> > website, but got a missing DLL error (sorry, he closed the shared screen
> > too fast for me to jot it down) when trying to run the server manager to
> > do a config of the cell.
>
I believe we successfully used
Hi.
We're still standardized on RHEL6 (up to date) with OpenAFS Linux.
Thanks.
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 01:14:20PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> OpenAFS has generally tried to provide a software that is compatible with
> a wide range of new and historical operating systems; it is
The OpenAFS Foundation would like to thank
Ben Kaduk
Jeff Altman
Jeffrey Hutzelman
Simon Wilkinson
Nickolai Zeldovich
Marc Dionne
Peter Iannucci
and others who have worked on the recent Security Patches just released
in OpenAFS 1.6.17. We thank you for addressing these issues so quickly
after
Being able to reactivate it is a good thing, for either testing purposes
or for older kernels, since it is more efficient - unless we think
there's other known brokenness such as the potential return out of the
while loop mentioned earlier.
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:13:12PM +0100, Stephan
There appear to be installers in the 1.6.15 subfolder. I don't see any
for 1.6.16, however.
While we can legally link wherever we want, realistically, we should
have permission from whomever. As far as I know, SNM are the only ones
who have asked, so far, to have 3rd party installers linked.
On
To the members of the OpenAFS community:
With the resignation of Daria from the OpenAFS Foundation Board of
Directors, the existing directors of the OpenAFS Foundation are putting
out a call to the OpenAFS community for volunteers who wish to join the
board.
The most important qualifications we
We have extended the deadline to midnight July 27. Please see below for
the original announcement...
The OpenAFS Foundation is pleased to announce the availability of funding to
assist 3 to 5 people with attending this year's Best Practices Workshop. More
info on the workshop is available at
To the OpenAFS community,
On behalf of Roman Mitz and the OpenAFS Foundation Board, I am pleased
to announce that the OpenAFS Foundation, Inc has been granted federal
Tax Exempt 501c3 status. This would not have been possible without the
hard work of Roman, the current board members, and the
The OpenAFS Foundation is pleased to announce the availability of funding to
assist 3 to 5 people with attending this year's Best Practices Workshop. More
info on the workshop is available at http://workshop.openafs.org/afsbpw15/ .
This funding is intended for those who would otherwise not be
On behalf of the Foundation Board, we're looking to see if there is any
further documentation.
Stay tuned.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 05:26:07PM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
On 4/27/2015 10:42 AM, Jack Hill wrote:
Is this agreement still secret? What work needs to be done to get it
At the time I sent the Foundation Board's communication, a group of
those in the OpenAFS community having organized previous workshops, was
just gearing up to plan a workshop for this fall. The Foundation Board
was unaware of this effort, but was contacted as soon as we sent our
communication. In
On behalf of the OpenAFS Foundation board...
It is time to begin planning for a 2015 OpenAFS workshop. Which means
planning the what, the where, the who, etc...
As the workshop is very much something of, by, and for the OpenAFS
community, we are soliciting a few volunteers from the OAFS
Hi, Jeff.
The updates are very very much appreciated. Certainly, these changes
will make life interesting in the future.
A couple of followup questions, if you know the answers...
When MS implements the new signing changes, whenever that is, is it
expected that existing installations of the AFS
subscribe.
Thank you!
-Dave Botsch
on behalf of the Foundation Board of Directors
--
David William Botsch
Programmer/Analyst
@CNFComputing
bot...@cnf.cornell.edu
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
You might be experencing the same bug I'm working with Microsoft.
That is, Windows would appear to not properly set the flags in its
renewal request when authenticating against a foreign Kerberos realm, so
the ticket one gets back from the foreign kerberos realm is not
renewable.
You can verify
Would love to see your code.
ALso gonna look at the previous mentioned tsmpipe... our central backup
system is TSM, so, I'd love to get rid of the holding disk we currently
dump to with a modification of afsdump.pl .
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 07:49:30PM +0100, Mattias Pantzare wrote:
On Wed,
One can also disable kext signing on Yosemite by adding
kext-dev-mode=1 to the boot args.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:31:36PM +, Brandon Allbery wrote:
So, an interesting and undoubtedly temporary workaround for unsigned
kexts on Yosemite/OS X 10.10 is that they can apparently be loaded by
I used the git head, and first had to create the various darwin-140
files as those were not there.
My attempt to compile the git head on a fresh install of Yosemite then
failed with the following:
http://fpaste.org/143001/
I don't know if Cornell's developer level allows signing of kernel
:11PM -0400, Dave Botsch wrote:
I used the git head, and first had to create the various darwin-140
files as those were not there.
My attempt to compile the git head on a fresh install of Yosemite then
failed with the following:
http://fpaste.org/143001/
I don't know if Cornell's
directory identifer?
Not according to the output of Process Monitor.
-Original Message-
From: openafs-info-ad...@openafs.org [mailto:openafs-info-ad...@openafs.org]
On Behalf Of Dave Botsch
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 2:35 PM
To: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: [OpenAFS
Hi, Jeff.
Thanks for the reply.
Additional questions...
What's the story with case insensitivity or sensitivity with the Windows
OAFS client?
File and directory name searches are performed:
1. case sensitive first
2. case insensitive second
Ambiguous case insensitive matches
Hi.
What's the story with case insentitivy or sensitivity with the Windows
OAFS client?
Of course, OpenAFS is case sensitive and Windows is not. So, does the
client attempt to resolve things irrespective or case or should it fail
if indeed the case doesn't match?
In this specific case, Corel
I would vote either for openafs.org or EPEL .
EPEL is really good about making sure that they don't override base
redhat packages and that packages in the repo don't brake w.r.t.
dependencies.
ATRpms and others are really horrid about both of those.
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:03:45AM -0500,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:32:53PM -0500, Andrew Deason wrote:
So, do I take this to mean, these solutions work well enough for us, so
I don't really care? :)
No, not in the least. I care very very much and wish I had the time to
improve the AFSTokens app.
Certainly there's always that
Well, is anything really transparent for the administrator? Especially
w.r.t. AFS, where the admin has to also configure the ThisCell, the afs
cache size (pre-allocate a cache partition, too, on linux), edit
ThisCell to be reasonable, and set numerous other client options (config
files on mac and
At the very least, I'd like to see a spec included in the source so
that one can rebuild on one's own the binaries from the source (on at
least the base RHEL and current Fedora).
IMHO, not offering binaries and telling users to go someplace else is
not perceived as friendly to the users...
That might be true, however, things like single DES going away (sort of)
as I understand it can break things with older clients.
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:44:21AM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Wed, 7 May 2014, Dave B. wrote:
One of our main thoughts is that the version numbers should be
I'm seeing a fair amount of these on a daily basis. At this point, I
believe I'm seeing them mostly from my RHEL6/64 machines running the
latest RHEL6.5 kernel and oafs 1.6.5.2 :
(Thoughts?)
abrt_version: 2.0.8
cmdline:ro root=UUID=2001c35a-147a-4854-bf48-37681bff20b6 rd_NO_LUKS
Does anyone have any experience with Oracle Enterprise Linux's
Unbreakable Kernel and OpenAFS (especially w lots of users logged in)?
Specifically on version 6u4 of OEL.
A basic boot and afs seems to come up fine, but, who knows if they did
something that would break AFS longer term.
My kernel
Hi.
Yum repo config files that should allow you to install openafs 1.6.5
from openafs.org can be found at:
https://confluence.cornell.edu/display/CNF/Installing+AFS
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:23:47AM -0500, Bill Glick wrote:
What is the current status of supporting Yum repositories for RHEL?
doesn't know to request only DES session keys for AFS service
tickets
And if we turn off DES support completely?
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 06:55:25PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Here's a patch against the current mod_waklog Git repository that adds
support for rxkad-kdf
but not
the contents and files. Then logout and let the SkyDrive folder
in the user profile be written back to AFS.
On 7/8/2013 1:38 PM, Dave Botsch wrote:
Being somewhat unfamiliar with Windows 8 / 8.1...
what are the suggested steps for recreating the conditions to replicate
the failure? I've got
Being somewhat unfamiliar with Windows 8 / 8.1...
what are the suggested steps for recreating the conditions to replicate
the failure? I've got a skydrive login setup, so, now what?
thanks.
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:09:59PM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Last Wednesday Microsoft released the
What would be the suggested resolution from Microsoft?
Any reason OAFSWin can't add support for these reparse points?
thanks.
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:09:59PM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Last Wednesday Microsoft released the one and only preview release of
Windows 8.1 in conjunction with
, Russ Allbery wrote:
Dave Botsch bot...@cnf.cornell.edu writes:
What would be the suggested resolution from Microsoft?
Any reason OAFSWin can't add support for these reparse points?
You can't do that only in the Windows client, at least if I'm
understanding the nature of reparse points
Is there documentation someplace on creating a non-voting clone?
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:54:07AM -0400, Derrick Brashear wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Andrew Deason adea...@sinenomine.netwrote:
On Mon, 20 May 2013 13:58:13 +0200
Gémes Géza g...@kzsdabas.hu wrote:
What is
The March 2013 edition of the OpenAFS newsletter is now online!
http://www.openafs.org/newsletter
--
David William Botsch
Programmer/Analyst
CNF Computing
bot...@cnf.cornell.edu
___
I'm using it on RHEL6 with php-5.3.3-14.el6_3.x86_64 and
php-Smarty-2.6.27-1.el6.noarch .
It does, however, run rather slowly... seems to be as a result of it
stat'ing all the files in a directory.
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:40:40PM +0100, Staffan Hämälä wrote:
I got mod_waklog to work on
I wonder if one could reasonably put /usr/afs and all the /vicep*
partitions on DRBD, and then fail those along with the IP address over
to the other server (corosync, pacemaker).
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:38:45PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
On 1/11/13 10:15 AM, Andrew Deason wrote:
On
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo