Has anybody had success with DKMS for building AFS modules on RHEL4?
Any generalized instructions and/or caveats?
Thanks,
Kevin
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
I recall having this problem on some Solaris 9 boxes once upon a time
at a previous job. Turns out, those machines' CellServDBs had some
stale entries and -fakestat wasn't enabled. Any time you'd open
something like a Save As or Open dialog, the process would hang
for 30+ seconds while trying to
(eat data,
etc).
I think this is better than refusing to start as it still gives the admin the
possibility of laying a fileserver over a filesystem (or filesystem
configuration) that isn't really supported.
Kevin Sumner
ITS Enterprise Storage Management
University of North Carolina at Chapel
TSM 6.1 was released last week. We're using the butc plugin for AFS right now
with 5.4, though we hope to upgrade to something newer in the not-too-distant
future.
Kevin Sumner
ITS Enterprise Storage Management
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
CB# 1150, 440 W. Franklin Street
are looking for other clues, but so far, nothing significant has
turned up.
Thanks!
Kevin
--
Kevin Sumner
ITS Enterprise Storage Management
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
CB# 1150, 440 W. Franklin Street, Office G408
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-1150
ksum...@unc.edu
919.962.1547 (office
are listed at all. IIRC the *_linux26
scheme has been the default in Linux 2.6 builds for quite a while. And while I
don't have a box with OpenAFS on Solaris in front of me, I think Solaris 10 on
Sparc defaults to sun4x_510.
Just curious.
Kevin Sumner
ITS Enterprise Storage Management
University
I haven't checked laptop boots with AFS in a while, but I'll test
dynroot and report back.
Also, sorry, my bad on the module-assistant -- I've not used it in a
couple of months.
Kevin Sumner
ITS Enterprise Storage Management
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
CB# 1150, 440 W
Btw, that's not to say you're having the same problem here. Sorry if I
jumped the gun. You may want to try giving the client a new UUID, esp.
if you've cloned the client rather than installing from scratch.
Kevin Sumner
ITS Enterprise Storage Management
University of North Carolina at Chapel
thought there was a fix in the 1.4 branch at some point, but we got
around it quickly by running fs uuid -generate on startup after the link
came up.
Kevin Sumner
ITS Enterprise Storage Management
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
CB# 1150, 440 W. Franklin Street, Office G408
Chapel Hill
connection.
Of course, you can ignore all of this if the Linux/Unix client is also
power management aware like Windows. Is it? If not, will we see that
in a future release?
Cheers,
Kevin Sumner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
The Windows client is power management aware
from 1.5.52 to .54 has resolved at least a few of my
strange-though-not-oft-encountered problems.
Cheers,
Kevin
--
Kevin Sumner
ITS Enterprise Storage Management
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
CB# 1150, 440 W. Franklin Street, Office G408
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-1150
T: (919) 962-1547
M
11 matches
Mail list logo