Awesome, thanks.
Steve
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:59 PM Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 02:53:13PM -0400, Steve Simmons wrote:
> > To make a long story short, we're going to be moving the network on which
> > our afsdb servers reside from one data center to an
?
Advance thanks,
Steve Simmons
the entire subnet that contains the afsdb servers to the new data center.
Thanks,
Steve Simmons
ITS Unix Support/SCS Admins
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 11:52 PM Jeffrey E Altman
wrote:
> I'm moving this discussion to openafs-info@openafs.org because its
> subject isn't about new or on
.
If you're using or used virtualized servers, we'd love to hear how their
working out for you.
At the moment, the servers are running OpenAFS 1.6.17. I don't know if
they're considering upgrading to 1.8.X as part of this or not.
Advance thanks,
Steve Simmons
ITS Unix Support/SCS Admins
Cron has no more knowledge about when the r/w volume is in a consistent
state than does AFS. Only the person(s) who make the changes to the r/w
volume know when it's ready to release.
Steve Simmons
ITS Unix Support/SCS Admins
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 9:22 AM Andreas Ladanyi
wrote:
> Hi Jeff
399 2924.95%
>
> lnx-16-
>
> lnx-17-
>
> lnx-18a 909 0.85%
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Ado Arnolds
>
> On 09.05.2017 19:23, Steve Simmons wrote:
>> About 10 years back I posted a 'afsdf' com
About 10 years back I posted a 'afsdf' command to openafs-info. Many
improvements were made based on suggestions here, but I never got round to
re-posting it. In general, the command does a df-ish disk usage report
across an entire cell, with various permutations on roll-ups, display
compaction,
We have a bunch of old linux-from-scratch systems which we're rolling out
the door and aren't going to be getting AFS upgrades. RHEL5 is the
next-oldest, about 15% of dropping fast and we're currently discussing what
to do w/r/t afs on them. Everything else with AFS is pretty recent.
The
On Aug 22, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Christof Hanke ha...@rzg.mpg.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 22.08.2013, 16:33 Uhr, schrieb Gémes Géza g...@kzsdabas.hu:
Sorry for this slightly off topic question, but what is the recommended way
to find out the version of the openafs installation.
I ask this because I
On Mar 25, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Russ Allbery r...@stanford.edu wrote:
david l goodrich d...@dsrw.org writes:
Running your servers without the client is (at the last time I checked)
recommended.
I don't know that I would go so far as to say recommended. Not having the
client installed does
Shadow volumes by their very definition never enter the vldb.
Steve
On Nov 15, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Arne Wiebalck wrote:
Dear all,
If detecting shadow volumes, does 'vos syncvldb' really update VLDB entries
to point to the shadow location instead of the location of the R/W source
volume
On Nov 6, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Jeffrey Altman jalt...@openafs.org wrote:
OpenAFS 1.7.18 is the next a series of OpenAFS clients for the Microsoft
Windows platform that is implemented as a native file system.
I am not asking for it, just
On Oct 2, 2012, at 12:53 AM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
Let's look at this another way...
If someone actually bothers to file an IP lawsuit of any sort regarding AFS,
then I think this would be the most credible sign of success I could possibly
imagine.
And then, in that case, if there were
The last bit of discussion on perlafs with openafs 1.6 seemed to end with the
note below. If there's been progress on this, can anyone point us at
patches/whatever? We've got a person here who's trying to use AFS perl
interfaces on gentoo with AFS 1.6, and he's not having much joy.
Advance
On Sep 10, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Andrew Deason wrote:
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:37:41 -0400 (EDT)
Richard Brittain richard.britt...@dartmouth.edu wrote:
The magic number embedded in osi_vfsops.c is easy enough to find, but
can anyone tell me if they have successfully changed this, or are
there
We've been receiving messages like this occasionally on one of our 1.4.8
clients:
Sep 4 15:54:03 host kernel: afs_get_hash_stats: Warning! exceeded max bucket
len 32
Sep 4 15:54:03 host kernel: afs_get_hash_stats: Warning! exceeded max bucket
len 30
Sep 1 07:13:18 host kernel:
Microsoft's SMB redirector to a dedicated AFS redirector.
Jeffrey Altman
On Thursday, August 23, 2012 4:41:41 PM, Steve Simmons wrote:
The central support staff for the umich cell and support staff for our
Engineering colleges have been working together to try and figure out some
odd
On Aug 23, 2012, at 8:25 PM, Andrew Deason wrote:
Also, if you 'vos zap -force' the RO/BK volume id, the volume will be
deleted pretty similarly as if you just 'rm'ed a few of those files. It
still has that problem, though, of leaking space.
I did not know that. Thanks.
Steve
On Aug 23, 2012, at 1:14 PM, ra...@hep.wisc.edu wrote:
We have an AFS filserver running openafs-server-1.4.14-80.1.sl5.
We had to salvage one of it's RW volumes after a reboot.
But then it's backup volume that wouldn't attach, needs to be salvaged
Yet salvage said read-only volume; not
The central support staff for the umich cell and support staff for our
Engineering colleges have been working together to try and figure out some odd
performance when using the Windows client. We now have a consistent and
reproducible example. At this point I lean towards it being an AFS client
On Jul 16, 2012, at 6:02 PM, Andrew Deason wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:07:10 -0400
Steve Simmons s...@umich.edu wrote:
Bos config for backupsys:
bnode cron snapshot 1
parm /usr/sbin/vos backupsys -se localhost -localauth
parm 18:00
end
This may not be a 'silent' error; you're
Seconding what Dan said. Under 'normal' circumstances, you can get away with
this. But if anything goes wrong with your afs server itself, you're in a
deadly embrace -- since the server doesn't come up, the client fails and the
sh*t hits the fan. Worse, if you've got server-side dependencies on
It appears that periodically bos backupsys silently fails for a volume. I'm
curious if others have seen the same issue.
We recently updated some of our AFS data gathering and internal health scripts
to report on volumes that had not had a recent .backup volume created. This has
mostly been a
On May 8, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Andrew Deason wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2012 22:24:43 +0200
Stefan Michael Guenther s.guent...@in-put.de wrote:
Well, as user admin I am allowed to create files, but even as a
mmember of the administrators group it is not possible for me?
This is strange.
Yes,
On Sep 24, 2011, at 9:25 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
Just a suggestion for the download links:
The section to download Source Code on the website looks a bit
crowded, with 12 links. Can we drop the plain .tar releases, and
only do .tar.gz or .tar.bz2 ? This would also save a bit of disk
space
On Sep 23, 2011, at 3:39 AM, Simon Wilkinson wrote:
On 23 Sep 2011, at 00:28, Derrick Brashear sha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Steve Simmons s...@umich.edu wrote:
I've been working on a patch to AFS so that one could add scales to
numbers. The primary goal
On Sep 22, 2011, at 8:04 AM, Ivan Glushkov wrote:
Been getting it every since updating to Lion, but never got around to
looking into it ?
I added
allow_weak_crypto = true
in the [libdefaults] part of /etc/krb5.conf and it works for me. I have no
idea what exactly this means -
I've been working on a patch to AFS so that one could add scales to numbers.
The primary goal is to be able to do things like
$ fs setq . 1g
and get a gigabyte quota. For we who use powers of 1024, that's a helluva lot
easier than
$ fs setq . 1048576
Especially when setting, say, 23g
On Sep 6, 2011, at 1:14 PM, Ben Howell wrote:
Will that release on/about Sep. 15 be a alpha/beta/dev release, or an
actual public release?
It's the 1.7 branch, and therefore a development release. And like all openafs
development releases, it's public.
On Sep 13, 2011, at 5:03 AM, Simon Wilkinson wrote:
We're currently maintaining 3 versions of the AFS fileserver - the LWP one, a
normal pthreaded fileserver, and the demand attach fileserver. The normal
pthreaded fileserver has been the default for all of our supported platforms
since
On Mar 10, 2011, at 10:46 AM, Claudio Prono wrote:
Hello all,
I have found some strange logs from a windows Client to my AFS:
Mar 9 14:52:22 afs kernel: [8648828.273271] UDP: short packet: From
xxx.xxx.xxx.68:7001 88/73 to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:7000
Mar 9 15:16:39 afs kernel:
On Mar 17, 2011, at 5:16 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
We have occasionally seen these. Other folks here tell me it's usually
due to low-quality hacking tools doing UDP-based probes. When they
happen here, the source address is always from various places
off-campus.
That was my first thought as
On Feb 1, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
On 1 Feb 2011, at 5:31am, Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/1/11 00:26 , Derrick Brashear wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Chris Jones jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk
wrote:
I need to run
On Jan 28, 2011, at 1:58 PM, Jeff Blaine wrote:
On 1/28/2011 1:52 PM, Derrick Brashear wrote:
did shutdown perchance take 30min?
Yes. I found this in BosLog.old just now:
Wed Jan 26 12:28:13 2011: upclientetc exited on signal 15
Wed Jan 26 12:28:13 2011: upclientbin exited on signal 15
On Jan 28, 2011, at 3:24 PM, Gary Gatling wrote:
I am in charge of several afs servers in our college. Right now there are 5
afs servers running on 5 SPARC based servers. We are ditching Solaris since
it sucks so bad and are going to move to Linux VM's running inside of VMware.
I was
On Jan 31, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Stephen Joyce wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Steve Simmons wrote:
We have seen similar issues. It occurs when there is a given vice partition
where lots of clients have registered callbacks but those clients are no
longer accessible. Not all the clients have
On Jan 31, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Andrew Deason wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:54:24 -0500
Steve Simmons s...@umich.edu wrote:
Wed Jan 26 12:28:13 2011: upclientetc exited on signal 15
Wed Jan 26 12:28:13 2011: upclientbin exited on signal 15
Wed Jan 26 12:28:24 2011: fs:vol exited on signal
On Dec 17, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
Someone should mention that Michigan has built some kind of infrastructure
around incremental volume shadowing, which should be a pretty efficient
approach given what OpenAFS gives you to work with... I don't know how you
go about
Matt Benjamin alluded to this in other email on the info list; given the state
of our world it's a good idea to get the idea out to others. The state of our
world doesn't mean it's coming apart, just means that we probably aren't going
to be working on this for the forseeable future.
Dan Hyde
On Dec 20, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Andrew Deason wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:46:38 -0500
Steve Simmons s...@umich.edu wrote:
A shadow volume is a read-only remote clone of a primary volume. We
had to create some terminology here, and 'primary' is what we called
the real-time, in-use, r/w
Having read the entire discussion up to this point, I find the alternate
version 3404 to be an acceptable workaround. There are lots of things in
various bits of software which look around for condition X to see if Y is
acceptable. Lacking a proper solution (more on that in a separate note),
Responding to various notes -
On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:05 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jeffrey Altman jalt...@secure-endpoints.com writes:
My one concern to switching to something like syslog by default is that
bos getlog will need to be re-implemented in a different fashion.
Yeah, this is a
On Dec 3, 2010, at 4:56 PM, Andrew Deason wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:00:37 -0500
chas williams - CONTRACTOR c...@cmf.nrl.navy.mil wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:53:08 -0600
Andrew Deason adea...@sinenomine.net wrote:
Why lose the logs? It's already annoying enough when I get told a
vos
On Nov 22, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Stephen Joyce wrote:
Note that I just read about this on slashdot
http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/11/22/1433246/Running-ZFS-Natively-On-Linux-Slower-Than-Btrfs,
which along with the cruft its discussions are wont to have, touches on
licensing issues.
In re plone vs this-that-the-other, Xwiki vs. Ywiki, etc -
I am a strong proponent of the volunteers having final say on the toolset.
Others can and should express their opinions, but after a reasonable period of
time (days or weeks, not months) the volunteers should get final decision
unless
On Nov 18, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Jeff Blaine wrote:
Probably odd, but...
I just wanted to thank all of the people who work on
OpenAFS, whether they're core developers, people who
answer questions on the list, tweak documentation,
submit bug reports, or anything else that contributes.
So,
On Nov 19, 2010, at 8:25 AM, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
On 11/19/2010 4:38 AM, Kamran Babazadeh wrote:
Hi,
does anyone of you has troubles with the AFS Client on Windows 7 64 Bit
Machines? I have a Server running which we can access by
authentificating ourselves with the AFS Client. On the the
On Nov 9, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
I'm looking at tidying and standardizing my $PATH across systems, and
I had a question about the /usr/afsws path. Is the /usr/afsws
convention considered deprecated?
If not, it should be. IMHO, of course.
On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Dan Pritts wrote:
Others will have to chime in on tuning the server for vos move. I have one
thought that might or might not help - do something like this from a host at
source site. I am far from sure of the syntax but you get the idea:
vos dump srv part
On Oct 15, 2010, at 1:40 PM, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Over the last year there has been discussion of adding -xml, -csv, and
other formatted text data streams. Would that be easier for you to work
with?
Obviously all of the functionality that is being performed by the
various command line
On Oct 15, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
On 10/15/2010 3:05 PM, Phillip Moore wrote:
While adding test cases for failures in the AFS::Command::PTS test
suite, I noticed the following unexpected results:
[r...@rpcore ~]# pts createuser -name fakeafscmduser -id -1010 -cell
On Oct 10, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam Megacz a...@megacz.com writes:
Russ Allbery r...@stanford.edu writes:
The problem is that it's also not uncommon for the fileserver to
completely or nearly completely stall when shutting down,
Just curious, is this stall a bug in the
On Oct 10, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Adam Megacz wrote:
MacOS seems to litter network shares with two kinds of files:
.DS_Store (Finder data)
._filename (AppleDouble resource fork)
There's a MacOS setting to disable the first kind of litter.
Unfortunately it seems like there is no way
On Sep 30, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Why does it matter for you if ZFS is being developed in open or not?
Can't speak for anybody else, but w/r/t umich and AFS it's likely a matter of
cost. We can build and run oAFS on white boxes a helluva lot cheaper than we
can do it on
On Sep 28, 2010, at 4:00 PM, Thomas Kula wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:49:59PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jeff Blaine jbla...@kickflop.net writes:
Barring an equivalent, what Linux setup...
a) seems most stable
b) is fsck-less
Even quick grunt responses are appreciated.
We
Spinning this off as a separate thread . . .
Is there anyone out there running oAFS on an ext4 filesystem? Even if it's only
experimental, I'd be interested in your experience.
Thanks,
Steve___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
On Sep 29, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Steve Simmons wrote:
Spinning this off as a separate thread . . .
Is there anyone out there running oAFS on an ext4 filesystem? Even if it's
only experimental, I'd be interested in your experience.
Thanks,
And now I see later in the other thread there's
On Sep 29, 2010, at 9:40 AM, Derrick Brashear wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Thomas Briggs tbri...@cs.ship.edu wrote:
I'm using OpenAFS 1.5.77 on Snow Leopard (10.6.4) on a laptop. Last night,
I forgot to shutdown AFS before I left an internet connected world. When I
opened up
On Aug 23, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Dale Pontius wrote:
Is there a piece of software that does this? It's been a long, long
time since I used Windows, but it sounds like this feature is what the
Windows client calls integrated login. Or maybe not. Either way, is
there a way to get MacOS to do
On Aug 20, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Gémes Géza wrote:
Initially I've planed to use the same ip address for the new server as
the old had. But maybe vos move is a better approach. I have an almost
empty partition, which I will empty up and reattach to the new server.
My only remaining concern is
On Jul 14, 2010, at 10:56 PM, Dan Pritts wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:43:36AM -0700, Jonathan Nilsson wrote:
I would like to replicate home directories (and other AFS volumes that are
primarily accessed read/write) for the purpose of faster disaster recovery
in certain common cases,
On May 19, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Simon Wilkinson wrote:
On 19 May 2010, at 13:29, Mark Huijgen wrote:
Would it be safe to apply this NAT ping functionality to the 1.4.x
series also?
Define safe.
Funny, my boss asked me the same question. :-) Fortunately for us as OP, it
appears our person
On May 17, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Derrick Brashear wrote:
At CMU we used emt, these days I'd use Russ Allbery's remctl.
Seconded. We use remctl as well.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
We've got a user here who's behind a firewall/nat and having some problems. The
firewall is likely an aggressive, as it protects a hospital. He's running the
stock Ubuntu 9.10 client, which he reports as being oafs version 1.4.11.
The symptom is that he gets periodic hangs when accessing files
On May 1, 2010, at 1:35 AM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On Apr 30, 2010, at 14:32 , Richard Brittain wrote:
This solves my immediate need, and I'll probably use your mount point
database too, but begs the question of why perl's
File::Find module works fine, while 'find' breaks.
On Apr 30, 2010, at 4:15 AM, Staffan Hämälä wrote:
Is there a version of du that does not follow AFS mountpoints?
If I try to do a 'du -sh *' in a directory that has some AFS mountpoints it
inevitably fails after some time. It also takes a lot of time when it has to
look through things
On Apr 13, 2010, at 7:02 PM, Derrick Brashear wrote:
Has anyone run into something like this? Is there a way to change the
permissions AFS reports to OSX, or is there a work around I'm failing to see?
Check out the RealModes setting. Edit
/var/db/openafs/etc/config/settings.plist, and
On Apr 13, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
I'm a long-time fan of having a switch that causes tools to dump their data
in an easy-to-machine-parse format. That isn't always doable, but when it
is, it's a big win.
As Andrew pointed out in another reply in this thread, the
On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
On 4/14/2010 10:51 AM, Steve Simmons wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
I'm a long-time fan of having a switch that causes tools to dump their
data in an easy-to-machine-parse format. That isn't always doable
On Apr 13, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Todd Lewis wrote:
Clearly the multi-line form is easier for humans to read, and the
related-data-on-one-line form is far simpler for scripts to parse. By far.
In both cases.
Is there a place on the ballot to vote for... both, with a switch?
I'm a long-time
On Mar 17, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Steven Jenkins wrote:
Could you provide filesystem information? (e.g., what filesystem, what
parameters given/used by mkfs, etc) That information is often quite
significant.
So smart of me to drop the note and then leave for vacation. Selected file
system values
On Mar 18, 2010, at 2:37 AM, Tom Keiser wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Derrick Brashear sha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Steve Simmons s...@umich.edu wrote:
We've been seeing issues for a while that seem to relate to the number of
volumes in a single vice
On Mar 18, 2010, at 6:43 AM, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
In the 1.4 series, the volume hash table size is just 128 which
would produce (assuming even distributions) average hash chains of
160 to 220 volumes per bucket given the number of volumes you
describe. This is quite long.
In the 1.5
On Mar 24, 2010, at 4:38 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Steve Simmons s...@umich.edu writes:
Our estimate too. But before drilling down, it seemed worth checking if
anyone else has a similar server - ext3 with 14,000 or more volumes in a
single vice partition - and has seen a difference. Note, tho
We've been seeing issues for a while that seem to relate to the number of
volumes in a single vice partition. The numbers and data are inexact because
there are so many damned possible parameters that affect performance, but it
appears that somewhere between 10,000 and 14,000 volumes
On Oct 31, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Derrick Brashear wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Anders Magnusson ra...@ltu.se
wrote:
The manpage for vos clone says there are a maximum of 7 clones
using the
namei fileserver.
What is the reason for this limitation?
The implementation uses only 3
On Oct 25, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Sriram Subramanian wrote:
Hi,
Im trying to understand the functioning of the AFS protocol and so
I'm trying to set up an AFS client and server machine inside our
lab. One of the steps require us to setup the afs root partition
using the vos create command.
On Oct 7, 2008, at 4:26 AM, Harald Barth wrote:
for H in `vos listaddr -noauth | sort | uniq` ; do
back up host H
done
Have you tried vos from 1.5.X which has the -noresolve?
Does it give you more information?
Can't say - we already fixed the problem on the afflicted host, and
If you ever even once did a vos backup on the volume, the .backup
volume still exists and still consumes space. Do a vos examine on the
volume and see if it shows one.
On Oct 7, 2008, at 5:12 AM, TIARA System Man wrote:
hi harald,
thanks for reply. however, i did not do vos backup. :)
On Jun 3, 2008, at 3:18 AM, Rainer Toebbicke wrote:
We've started a program of low rate preventive salvages of
individual volumes (in -nowrite, per volume while fileserver is
running, mainly to spot irregularities) and ran into the following
problem . . .
Sounds all logical for a
On May 26, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
. . . Plus, a stable demand-attach is a good milestone for
releasing 1.5 . . .
Agreed.
That said, do we have a milestone list for 1.5 becoming 1.6?
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
On May 26, 2008, at 8:16 PM, Esther Filderman wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Robert Banz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
however, with 1.4, fastrestart is
teh bomb. ;)
Yes, but it's teh bomb that can blow up in your face.
Remember that the salvager is there to make sure you're volumes
On May 29, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Steve Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On May 26, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
. . . Plus, a stable demand-attach is a good milestone for
releasing 1.5 . . .
Agreed.
That said, do we have a milestone list for 1.5 becoming 1.6
On May 13, 2008, at 9:31 AM, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Steve Simmons wrote:
We're a state-funded institution as well, so 501c(3) for OpenAFS
doesn't mean that much to us. But it can make a big, big difference
for corporations or individuals donating funds or equipment. If I
had enough bucks
On May 11, 2008, at 1:37 PM, Rodney M. Dyer wrote:
At 11:42 AM 5/11/2008, Esther Filderman wrote:
As it's own 501c3 corporation OpenAFS would be able to accept
donations without a third party, something that would probably make
it
easier -- and more comfortable -- for many sites to do.
On May 11, 2008, at 2:54 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
I think the politics of funding a foundation might be better served by
continuing the relatively closed-access CVS repo.
I think the two issues are pretty much independent.
___
OpenAFS-info
Short answer: Go for it. I know I speak for the rest of the AFS
support staff in our group at Umich when I say that.
Any longer answer would most be echoing the individual points back at
you going yeah, yeah.
Steve
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
On Apr 25, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Berthold Cogel wrote:
Mike Garrison schrieb:
On Apr 17, 2008, at 5:30 AM, Berthold Cogel wrote:
[snip]
Now I'm looking for some hints to debug this problem. Has anybody
seen this before? The server is running openafs 1.2.13.
1.2.13? 1.2.13 was released
While I haven't used those particular linux versions, I have found
that dump/restores work across every UNIX/linux flavor we've ever
tried or seen - solaris, linux, RH, whatever. It should be completely
OS- and AFS-version independent.
Steve
On Apr 14, 2008, at 5:47 AM, Vladimir Konrad
On Feb 12, 2008, at 1:08 PM, Derrick Brashear wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 12:31 PM, Andrew Bacchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see any documentation on changeloc. Is this an old
command, or
newly added by OAFS? Any ideas on moving a volume without the
original
fileserver running?
On Dec 13, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Derrick Brashear wrote:
The other was to salvage every single volume in the cell, attaching
the orphans:
bos salvage volume -orphans attach
Sonofagun if my salvages on reboot didn't stop peppering me with
complaints. We deleted all the dead files it found,
On Dec 12, 2007, at 11:06 PM, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
...Stupid things like re-using objects that were recently accessed
because
the queues did not track objects in the order of most recent use.
Being
forced to read data or directory entries from the file server that was
just written by the
I'm comfortable with the idea and with all three companies.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
I'm going to second a big chunk of what Jerry wrote. About five years
ago I inherited an AFS cell that had been through some rough time and
spent more than a little time cleaning. The end result was much
faster service. Our performance was never as bad as Jerry's, but it
was still nothing
On Nov 30, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Jason Edgecombe wrote:
What types of storage technologies are other AFS sites using for their
AFS vicep partitions? We need to figure our future direction for the
next couple of years. Fibre channel seems all the rage, but it's quite
expensive. I'm open to any and
On Dec 3, 2007, at 9:53 AM, John Lockard wrote:
I'm curious about those using ext3... Are you running
ext3 with or without journaling?
With.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
On Nov 15, 2007, at 11:37 AM, Kevin Scott Sumner wrote:
Is there ANYTHING that could POSSIBLY break when we have a mixture
of these 1.2 and 1.4 servers running together? Version issues, OS
issues, Endian issues, etc.
I did pretty much what you describe going from old 1.2 to early 1.4
Advance apologies to anybody who gets more than 1 copy; this is going
to a number of lists.
We have an opening for a programmer in our group at UM. The details
of the posting are at the bottom, so you don't need to go hit our web
page to see it. If you really must, see the posting, you'll
I've got a variety of scripts to do volume moves in interesting ways,
here's a summary:
grabuser: Run it on an afs server, it moves the users volume 'here'.
mvvols: read a list of volumes, move every n-th one as prescribed.
Useful for thinning a file server.
On Oct 24, 2007, at 12:34 PM,
On Oct 24, 2007, at 10:22 AM, Christopher D. Clausen wrote:
Steven Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/07, Derrick Brashear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
perl scripts exist to do it and I think have been posted here in the
past; they may even deal with the RO already exists case.
It would
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
