On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Andrew Deason adea...@sinenomine.net wrote:
Due to the various bug reports filed about this issue, Red Hat has
indicated that they are considering this issue a regression in Red Hat
Enterprise Linux and will be providing a fix in at least RHEL 6.6 and an
RHEL
Thanks for that information, it is very useful to know, I had been
wondering for a while which version would include the fix.
Cheers,
Stephen
On 13 May 2014 20:35, Marc Dionne marc.c.dio...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Andrew Deason adea...@sinenomine.net
wrote:
Due
I've opened Case #01053566 with Red Hat today for USGS.
- Ken
SLAC has Red Hat case # 01051669 opened on this.
I have made a request in our case to link to your case to add weight to the
issue.
Karl
:�� T���j)b� b�өzpJ)ߢ�^��좸!��l��b��(���~�+Y���b�ا~�~ȧ~
Can an openafs developer (who is knowledgeable about the details of this issue)
open a redhat bugzilla case on this (if not already done).
SLAC's redhat TAM said this will be the best way to get traction on this. He
wants to link all the Red Hat customer cases to a bugzilla case.
SLAC's redhat
FYI
From our open RH case for 5.x. Quote is from RH support:
We have requested this regression be repaired in RHEL 5.11
under Bug 1080606, we have also requested that the fix be
considered for backport into 5.10.z.
___
OpenAFS-info
, 2014 1:34 PM
To: Ken Dreyer; ren...@slac.stanford.edu
Cc: Jeffrey Altman; openafs-info@openafs.org; k...@slac.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS client crashes on RHEL 5.10 and RHEL 6.5
On 03/12/2014 01:24 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
I've opened Case #01053566 with Red Hat today for USGS
] On
Behalf Of Andrew Deason
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 3:04 PM
To: openafs-annou...@openafs.org
Cc: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: [OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS client crashes on RHEL 5.10 and RHEL 6.5
Due to the various bug reports filed about this issue, Red Hat has
indicated that they are considering
Due to the various bug reports filed about this issue, Red Hat has
indicated that they are considering this issue a regression in Red Hat
Enterprise Linux and will be providing a fix in at least RHEL 6.6 and an
RHEL 6.5 update. Red Hat has not yet indicated that a fix will be
available for RHEL 5,
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:03:14 -0600
Andrew Deason adea...@sinenomine.net wrote:
It has been discovered that the OpenAFS client interacts poorly with a
change to the Linux kernel introduced in Red Hat Enterprise Linux
versions 5.10 and 6.5, which can cause a kernel panic with certain AFS
access
On 03/17/2014 12:15 PM, Andrew Deason wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:03:14 -0600
Andrew Deason adea...@sinenomine.net wrote:
It has been discovered that the OpenAFS client interacts poorly with a
change to the Linux kernel introduced in Red Hat Enterprise Linux
versions 5.10 and 6.5, which can
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 08:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Renata Maria Dart ren...@slac.stanford.edu wrote:
Hi Andrew, we opened a ticket with RedHat, but it is
not clear how to proceedare you thinking that we
should be asking them for a fix?
If you're concerned about this, the way I would frame the
Thanks Andrew...we'll see what we can find out.
Renata
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Andrew Deason wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 08:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Renata Maria Dart ren...@slac.stanford.edu wrote:
Hi Andrew, we opened a ticket with RedHat, but it is
not clear how to proceedare you thinking that
As with any situation in which there are products from two vendors
involved it is critical that bug reports be opened by affected customers
with both vendors. Only by receiving a significant number of bug
reports can a vendor decide to prioritize a work around, fix or
other change.
A large
Hi Jeffmakes sense...we'll add more to our 2 cents with them.
Thanks,
Renata
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
As with any situation in which there are products from two vendors
involved it is critical that bug reports be opened by affected customers
with both vendors. Only by
I've opened Case #01053566 with Red Hat today for USGS.
- Ken
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Renata Maria Dart
ren...@slac.stanford.edu wrote:
Hi Jeffmakes sense...we'll add more to our 2 cents with them.
Thanks,
Renata
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
As with any
On 03/12/2014 01:24 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
I've opened Case #01053566 with Red Hat today for USGS.
- Ken
Notre Dame also opened one a few days ago
#01051867.
Rich
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Renata Maria Dart
ren...@slac.stanford.edu wrote:
Hi Jeffmakes sense...we'll add more
16 matches
Mail list logo
