Sorry for the delayed response. It looks like Jeffrey's and Andrew's
responses should have addressed the major issues.
It would also be a little easier for me if the attribution of who wrote
the quoted text was retained.
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Peter Grandi wrote:
** Crucial details for
On 1/23/2014 2:18 PM, Peter Grandi wrote:
[ ... ] results in the loss of the existing single-DES key
from the KDB,
That is intentional and expected.
Perhaps it should be noted in the procedure then. I have noticed
that the language in the procedure is somewhat ambiguous on
keeping or
