tor 2008-06-12 klockan 16:07 +0100 skrev Simon Wilkinson:
Ultimately, the place you get the RPMs from is probably the
key signifier of their status
Yes.
Btw, I think I'd be happy with gpgcheck=0 combined with a https URL for
the yum repository, except that I'm not sure yum's HTTP client
We're having this exact same problem that was never replied
to publicly in 2006:
http://www.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-devel/2006-July/014073.html
OpenAFS 1.4.7 (and older revs too) with libafs64.o under
Solaris 10 (old version and also fully patched modern version).
fre 2008-06-13 klockan 08:26 -0400 skrev Jason Edgecombe:
Would sucking them straight out of AFS make you feel any better? You can
have the CellServDB entries hard-coded and the AFS folders can only be
modified by someone who has access.
Yeah, that's what I'm doing now (though simply I'm
Jeff Blaine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're having this exact same problem that was never replied
to publicly in 2006:
http://www.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-devel/2006-July/014073.html
OpenAFS 1.4.7 (and older revs too) with libafs64.o under
Solaris 10 (old version and also fully patched
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Blaine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're having this exact same problem that was never replied
to publicly in 2006:
http://www.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-devel/2006-July/014073.html
OpenAFS 1.4.7 (and older revs too) with libafs64.o under
Solaris 10
