We use IP-address-based ACLs on one of our Solaris 9 clients
with no problems.
This Linux box we're trying to set up the same way is having
none of it.
The admin work:
ADMIN% pts creategroup silkhosts
group silkhosts has id -1594
ADMIN% pts adduser X.Y.11.70 silkhosts
ADMIN% pts adduser
Btw, that's not to say you're having the same problem here. Sorry if I
jumped the gun. You may want to try giving the client a new UUID, esp.
if you've cloned the client rather than installing from scratch.
Kevin Sumner
ITS Enterprise Storage Management
University of North Carolina at Chapel
We had a problem with this at the last place I worked -- turned out to
be the Linux clients getting an all-zero UUID on startup. When somebody
without permission with the same UUID would auth to the cell and start
doing file IO, our machines would quit being able to use IP-based ACLs.
I
Hi,
Is there a place I can find the current file, directory, volume and
partition limits for OpenAfs ? I'm not sure which values are current.
This is what I found searching:
Max Number of Volumes Per Server: ?
Max partition size in 1.4.x is 2TB
Max partition size in 1.5.x is max signed int64
I think there is overall consensus that volume splitting functionality
is a good idea. I would like to recommend that we avoid focusing on any
particular implementation of the idea at the moment and discuss the use
cases for which a user interface and implementations are required.
There are two
Jeffrey Altman jalt...@secure-endpoints.com writes:
For the afs administrator it is perfectly reasonable to assume a vos
command interface which should not be tied to a cache manager. The afs
administrator is comfortable working with the concept of volumes. It is
therefore not unreasonable
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Esther Filderman mizmo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:31 AM, gary mazzaferro ga...@oedata.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there a place I can find the current file, directory, volume and
partition limits for OpenAfs ? I'm not sure which values are current.
Solution: Wait 3 hours.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
--On Thursday, January 08, 2009 12:32:20 PM -0800 Russ Allbery
r...@stanford.edu wrote:
Steven Jenkins steven.jenk...@gmail.com writes:
fs getfid (like virtually all of the fs subcommands) is implemented by
marshalling arguments and then making a PIOCTL call into the kernel.
Without a cache
Thanks so much !!!
I'm evaluating different distributed file systems for a cloud file
system
Yes, I said it, cloud.
I've always admired the Andrew concept from the early/mid 80's.
I like that AFS doesn't attempt to wide stripe data across servers. This
company's model, they have lots of
10 matches
Mail list logo
