Copying the same file from an NFS server on
the same subnet as the AFS server is comparable on
my Mac and on a supported Linux machine, as is scp'ing
the file from a supported Linux machine.
Is NFS using TCP in your environment? If it is, you haven't ruled out
network yet.
Derrick, did
Jeff Blaine wrote:
Copying the same file from an NFS server on
the same subnet as the AFS server is comparable on
my Mac and on a supported Linux machine, as is scp'ing
the file from a supported Linux machine.
Is NFS using TCP in your environment? If it is, you haven't ruled out
network
scp is also TCP. It tells us nothing about how routers might treat
UDP. NFS was the only possible comparable, hence the question.
Derrick
On Jun 25, 2009, at 12:07, Jeff Blaine jbla...@kickflop.net wrote:
Copying the same file from an NFS server on
the same subnet as the AFS server is
I just clean installed Fedora 10, and applied available updates to the
system.
I then added this to /etc/yum.repos.d/openafs.repo:
[openafs]
name=OpenAFS 1.4.10 for Fedora $releasever - $basearch
baseurl=http://dl.openafs.org/dl/openafs/1.4.10/fedora-$releasever/$basearch/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
On 25 Jun 2009, at 19:42, Ethan Tira-Thompson wrote:
SMP=SP; eval `grep CONFIG_SMP /boot/
config-2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.i686`;
[ -n $CONFIG_SMP ] SMP=MP; KMODNAME=openafs.ko; DSTKMOD=.;
[ `echo
2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.i686 | sed -e 's/^\([0-9]*\.[0-9]*\)\..*/
\1/'`
= 2.4 ]
