Are people still doing things like mapping user home directory
volumes to certain partitions on certain servers, keeping track
in a database, etc?
What does this buy, assuming all data served from storage comes
from like hardware (speed, capacity, etc)?
We've kept up this practice and I'm not
[ For those running ext3/ext4, a question further down for you as ]
[ well! ]
We're still a 100% Solaris + ZFS file server shop. We're EOLing
our Sun SPARC hardware (with tears in our eyes) this year.
Before we spend a significant amount
FYI
From our open RH case for 5.x. Quote is from RH support:
We have requested this regression be repaired in RHEL 5.11
under Bug 1080606, we have also requested that the fix be
considered for backport into 5.10.z.
___
OpenAFS-info
First, thank you very much for those who donate time and/or resources to
provide builds of OpenAFS.
How does one determine how these packages were built? What configure
args? Are they all done with bare ./configure make dest ?
___
OpenAFS-info mailing
or FreeBSD to retain ZFS.
--
Jeff Blaine
kickflop.net
PGP/GnuPG Key ID: 0x0C8EDD02
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
to finalize
things. This may or may not be downtime for you.
--
Jeff Blaine
kickflop.net
PGP/GnuPG Key ID: 0x0C8EDD02
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
If you had to bulk migrate online volumes across partitions on the same
server, would you just stick to 'vos move'? Other options?
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Hello,
df --local shows /afs in the listing.
Many security tools use 'df --local' to determine local filesystems to
traverse recursively.
If you're like me, you're tired of security tools traversing the
local-but-NOT-LOCAL /afs mountpoint.
I've opened a ticket with the Center for Internet
301 - 308 of 308 matches
Mail list logo