In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Adam Megacz writes:
Sorry for the confusion. It's not the way the layout is done, but
that it is done at all.
as i said before, it likely the layout was done to reduce directory
contention. if you have a file buried eight levels deep the fileserver
doesnt need to
We upgraded file servers to 1.4.1 (built 2006-05-05) but not solve meltdown.
Fileserver going in large mode and behaviour of meltdown are:
- first 10min: 12 idle threads are full used, only 2 idle threads
(get from rxdebug)
- 0: wprocs counting up from zero
- about next 10 min: up to 300
Hi,
I am installing Open AFS on a server in my lab. I followed all the
instructions in the Quick Installation guide and finally restarted the
computer. I then realized that I had not created the upserver. Now, when
I try to issue the bos create upserver ... command I get the following
error.
Aside from the abusive language..
1. Tektronix had a 17 year maintenance period after a product went out of
life. In the case of the 7000 oscilliscope which was in production for 17
years, Tek was contractually obligated to provide spare parts and
provisioning to little customers like IBM and the
Hi,
I've installed and configured OpenAFS, and I've been using it for about
four months. As I've expanded the installation and added new users, I've
begun to receive requests to add entire offices and laboratories. In
preparation to add a very large laboratory, I started to plan how to
Sanjay Dharmavaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I am installing Open AFS on a server in my lab. I followed all the
instructions in the Quick Installation guide and finally restarted the
computer. I then realized that I had not created the upserver. Now, when
I try to issue the bos
On Monday, October 09, 2006 11:20:09 PM -0400 Derrick J Brashear
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The AFS fileserver wasn't designed to solve this. The AFS protocol and
client certainly could be used to solve it.
You're correct, of course. You _could_ solve the
share-the-local-filesystem
On Tuesday, October 10, 2006 01:16:52 AM -0400 Marcus Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Obfuscation might still have been seen as helpful when
explaining to bean-counter type people why the fileserver shouldn't
also be the mail server
I'm pretty sure the people designing AFS didn't have that
On Tuesday, October 10, 2006 09:03:40 AM -0400 chas williams - CONTRACTOR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Adam Megacz writes:
Sorry for the confusion. It's not the way the layout is done, but
that it is done at all.
as i said before, it likely the layout was done
On 10/10/06, Joseph Kulisics [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there's a performance tuning guide, a FAQ, or a message thread on the
subject, please, let me know. I looked around the web a lot, but I didn't
find any guide. (Maybe I just haven't found the right search words.)
There was something on
On Tuesday, October 10, 2006 09:37:03 AM -0700 ted creedon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If industry did a better job of archiving and placing old software in the
public domain, there would be very few software patents issued..
Well, that was a nice little rant, but I fail to see what
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Michal Svamberg wrote:
We upgraded file servers to 1.4.1 (built 2006-05-05) but not solve meltdown.
get a backtrace when the fileserver is not responding.
on a whim, you might also try this patch:
http://grand.central.org/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=19461
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Jeffrey Hutzelman w
rites:
On the other hand, usenet servers have soundly beaten us to taking the next
logical step, which is to punt entirely on using a general-purpose
filesystem and instead use a purpose-built data store.
i have wondered about this. others have
http://www.physics.unc.edu/~stephen/backuppc-afs/
Feedback welcome.
Cheers, Stephen
--
Stephen Joyce
Systems AdministratorP A N I C
Physics Astronomy Department Physics Astronomy
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jeffrey Hutzelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the other hand, usenet servers have soundly beaten us to taking the
next logical step, which is to punt entirely on using a general-purpose
filesystem and instead use a purpose-built data store.
Usenet servers have a much easier problem, though,
Sanjay Dharmavaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am installing a new AFS server on my network which already has anAFS
server running. The aim is to replace the already running server with
the new one. Is there anyway I can copy volumes and user accounts from
the old server onto the new server?
Cool as the transactional piece would be, iirc from our discussion in
2004, putting a postgresql behind every fileserver sounds kind of
heavyweight, doesn't it?
Plus, is there a difference between transactional metadata updates and
transactional file data updates?
Matt
Marcus Watts wrote:
Quoting Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 12:42:47PM -0400, Ron Croonenberg wrote:
Is there a set of rpm's available to install the OpenAFS client on FC5
x86-64 ? Or do I have to compile that myself ?
Yes, use the packages at http://atrpms.net/dist/fc5/openafs/
There
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Marcus Watts writes:
of postgresql implement blobs as chunks in a special table which can be
randomly accessed. Blobs can be up to 2G in size. There are also
...
My recollection is that oracle has some sort of chunk-wise access
to blobs. I assume other db systems
chas williams - CONTRACTOR [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bdb supports records up to 4G in size. so this will limit files unless
you span them across records. bdb certainly supports partial access
to records. it maintains some idea of page size for i/o operations
(where you choose page size based
20 matches
Mail list logo
