What does brain.ny.secure's log say?
Here's what the VolserLog on afs.ny.secure says:
Thu Jun 21 08:47:28 2007 VAttachVolume: Failed to open
/vicepa/V1442840991.vol (errno 2)
Thu Jun 21 08:47:28 2007 1 Volser: CreateVolume: volume 1442840991
(admin.accounting.readonly) created
Thu Jun 21
] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Derrick Brashear
*Sent:* Thursday, June 21, 2007 9:00 AM
*To:* openafs-info@openafs.org
*Subject:* Re: [OpenAFS] Having trouble releasing volumes to newsite
What does brain.ny.secure's log say?
Here's what the VolserLog on afs.ny.secure says:
Thu Jun 21
remember vos itself uses a random port; only the volservers use 7005. so
just 7005-7005 doesn't help
On 6/21/07, Frank Burkhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 08:56:02AM -0400, David Sonenberg wrote:
I have a newly created file and database server, that I am first
On 6/25/07, Steven Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/18/07, Frank Burkhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently removing a backup clone which belongs to a volume
containing ~
55 GB in ~ 102000 files. 'vos status' shows a DeleteVolume transaction
which is running since 63 min
On 6/26/07, Adam Megacz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anybody help me figure out what happened here? How can an Rx call
failure during a volume dump result in the volume-being-dumped
becoming unattachable?
Needing salvage is not the same as unattachable. Did you salvage it?
The real issue
On 6/26/07, Adam Megacz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Derrick J Brashear [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For argument's sake, let's assume only a single front-end (imapd)
machine.
That's not especially dangerous, then. the worst risk is screwing with
Cyrus' idea of the universe if a volume goes away
- When the fileserver wants to enumerate the set of volumes that
share blocks with a given volume, it checks all other numerical
volume ids which could possibly be in its volume group.
that would be all possible volume ids. so, no.
because i remember the issue from a bug, well,
Well from what I can see I am not sure I can count on the FileLog. Is
there anyway to make the fileserver keep more than FileLog and
FileLog.old ?
that's not enough either, since a volume can be attached and then go offline
when a flaw is discovered.
you'd really need to have something
On 6/28/07, Marc Dionne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russ Allbery wrote:
Bcc'd to bugs.
Looks like we still don't have everything quite right for 2.6.22, or I
didn't pull up enough. I pulled up various patches from the current
STABLE CVS around the build logic, but is there another that I
another way to copy the volumes (WITH the ACLs and quota) is to vos dump
them and vos restore in the other cell (if users/groups are the same).
Had done that some different times here and it worked well.
as I said, there is a problem with fs la on restored volume (it segfaults)
This is
On 7/2/07, Alessio Rocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody.
I'm writing to ask you for the meaning of
New release -- old release and
old release -- old release
configurations, appearing while issuing the vos listvldb command.
Reading the documentation didn't help me :(
a vos release was
vos examine root.afs
vos examine root.cell
you might consider configuring the client with -dynroot (probably in the
client options in /etc/sysconfig/afs; it's an afsd switch) in which case the
panic will go away regardless and you can focus on the core issue of
unbreaking your cell.
On 7/3/07,
On 7/7/07, Frank Burkhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 12:14:22PM -0400, Derrick Brashear wrote:
On 7/2/07, Alessio Rocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody.
I'm writing to ask you for the meaning of
New release -- old release and
old release -- old release
Is this binary 1.4.2 or later? If not, well, can you try with one that is?
I ran the binary on my machine against enea.it. No such strings. It's 1.4.4.
Likewise with a 1.2.11 binary.
Run what `which vos`|grep -i openafs?
On 7/9/07, Alessio Rocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paste some actual
So, no actual problem. I thought I remembered working on fixing something
related to this with Kris Van Hees a while ago.
On 7/10/07, Alessio Rocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got the version of OpenAFS that is installed on the machine where i
ran the tests.
It is a 1.2.13.
I followed your
On 7/16/07, Lundgren, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suggest using a version of Linux that has pre-built
binaries available for it unless you have some special requirements.
Looking at the Redhat distros that are supported, the newer builds are
not present. (RH5 is out was well as
On 7/17/07, Harald Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at the Redhat distros that are supported, the newer builds are
not present. (RH5 is out was well as newer RH4, the current kernel is
several version newer than what has packages available.)
Yes. It takes a serious amount of
On 7/23/07, Jesse W. Asher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran across the below paragraph in an IBM document at
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246657.pdf (page 7). When
talking about NFSv4, they said:
*
NFS has evolved into a powerful enterprise file system that enables it to
take
On 7/23/07, Alessio Rocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody.
I'm back to ask you for a strange behaviour i'm experiencing:
doing a vos ex volid, the correspondant volume results on-line.
doing a vos listvol server hosting the previous volid, i can notice that
this volid is unattacheable.
On 7/23/07, Bruce Orchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the last few days, kernel 2.6.22 was released as an update for Fedora
7. A build from source of Openafs 1.4.4 fails with the following message:
We's distributing RPMs for it now. yum should be able to update you.
(Thanks to Simon
use gdb's generate-core-file, or gcore, or pstack if you have it, and get a
backtrace.
On 7/27/07, Matthew Cocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
We are running about 20 redhat AS3 based openafs 1.4.2 fileservers. For
the last three days between 4pm-10pm we have been getting 4-6 fileserver
stop
On 7/26/07, Nick Merker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I am attempting to generate an activity log of my OpenAFS implementation.
What I really want is to log all accesses based on path. For example, when
a user accesses /afs/me/user/me/hi I'd like that path to dump to a log
file.
Given
On 8/1/07, Todd M. Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to tell the fileservers not to talk to clients below a
certain rev, or only allow reads? That should encourage them to upgrade.
Or leave. Not nice maybe, but if old clients can DoS your servers...
The version probe is not
If people agree we should revert it (I committed it already)
I'm tempted to leave it fixed.
On 8/9/07, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rainer Toebbicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AFS defines the issue-date in the ticket file alike the token
startTime to be an afs_int32, whereas krb4
The andrew versions are arguably latest and I can certainly grab
copies if someone cares, but yeah, they don't really belong in
OpenAFS.
On 8/9/07, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dr A V Le Blanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some time ago there was some discussion about the package command
bos getlog will display the errors, or, just go look at the logs.
On 8/14/07, Sophana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I'm doing some experiments with openafs 1.4.4 under centos 4.5
I've installed a cell on one server and some clients with no problems.
I'm now trying to add a database server to
On 8/21/07, Jack Neely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
We are starting to deploy RHEL 5 with OpenAFS 1.4.4. All users have
there home directories in AFS.
The Trash can on the gnome desktop doesn't work. I found out that the
Trash functionality in gnome-vfs was turned off for AFS
On 8/23/07, Dr A V Le Blanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Robert Sturrock wrote:
In former times (when Linux was just born), the content of /afs was
delivered by a volume itself (named root.afs). All this volume contained
were mountpoints to root.cell-volumes of other
kill -XCPU the fileserver, and look at the host list. I bet the IP addresses
you care about show alternate addresses (presumably illegit).
On 8/24/07, Stephen Joyce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using IP-based ACLs to protect some parts of my cell. (I know this
not ideal, but the info isn't
On 8/25/07, Jason Edgecombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is very useful to know.
It doesn't appear to be in the fileserver man page. Is it documented
anywhere else?
What other signals can be used? Where can I find out about them?
XCPU is USR2 on NT, and POLL on HPUX, fwiw.
For the
On 8/29/07, Sophana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Still testing openafs features.
I have 2 master servers in my listed in /usr/vice/etc/CellServDb
So all services are replicated, including root volumes and some more.
Both my servers are listed in bos listhost XXX
Now I shutdown one of the
On 9/6/07, Robert Banz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 6, 2007, at 22:05, Derrick J Brashear wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, Coy Hile wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone else seen issues with the OpenAFS client causing kernel
panics
on startup on Solaris 10 update 4 (KJP 120011-14) SPARC? I
On 9/12/07, Dave Botsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
What is the status of multiple local realms in the 1.4.x code?
Not released.
fake addresses plus netrestrict equals suck; i think i fixed that post 1.4.4
.
On 9/12/07, Dave Botsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all.
Recently upgraded my single oafs server on a private ip and using netinfo
to
also answer on a public ip to 1.4.4, then tried to change the public ip.
A
On 9/12/07, Dave Botsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When did it supposedly break (since it worked in 1.2.x)?
Didn't see how it could have, but I'm not really going to go experiment.
I already have negative time with the work I need to get done.
On 9/12/07, Derrick Brashear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/12/07, Dave Botsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When did it supposedly break (since it worked in 1.2.x)?
Didn't see how it could have, but I'm not really going to go experiment.
I already have negative time with the work I need
What's in the FileLog? Notably, do you have e.g.
VL_RegisterAddrs rpc failed
or somesuch?
On 9/13/07, Dave Botsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, since the sysid file is not being recreated on its own and since vos
listaddrs now shows no addresses at all on the server...
1. Is this bad
Ok. So either tell the fileserver where the dbserver(s) really are or, I
dunno. 5376 is UNOQUORUM, so I have no idea what he's talking to.
On 9/13/07, Dave Botsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VLLog:
Thu Sep 13 00:51:21 2007 Using 192.168.1.20 as my primary address
Thu Sep 13 00:51:21 2007
On behalf of my employer I did some patches for a customer which I believe
were never deployed; the biggest issue was that modwaklog didn't play nicely
with apache2, and that support was contributed back already.
On 9/21/07, Dave Botsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
Those of you who have
On 9/21/07, Kim Kimball [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that the AFS client was supposed to do the equivalent of an
'fs checkv' on a timed thread, every hour.
I think it's 2 hours.
I've recently seen clients not notice a change in volumeID:name mapping
for more than two days, and an
On 9/21/07, Simon Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21 Sep 2007, at 19:23, Dave Botsch wrote:
Those of you who have successfully deployed filedrawers elsewhere,
how did you
do it? What problems / changes did you run into / have to make?
We're running it with Apache 1.3. The service
On 9/23/07, Matt Benjamin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
As I understand it, and I was in a discussion about this last week: If
the gatekeepers were willing and able to establish a more collaborative
project around this, there are more developers
The afs server threads servicing that client blocked and there was a race
caught when the client tried making more of the same RPC while the previous
one was still being serviced.
On 9/24/07, Frank Burkhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
an afs client of mine does some cron job on a regular
it would involve a semantic change but we could start flushing changes in
the background before fsync. there are of course potential issues.
On 9/24/07, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Megacz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've noticed that when writing really large files with
On 9/25/07, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dirk Heinrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
since I got a mail from another person who had this same problem, I
would like to follow up on this. Here's what I wrote back in august:
[...]
The problem seems to be independent of the server(s)
On 9/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cannot get around this problem - see error messages from FileLog:
Tue Sep 25 16:15:21 2007 VL_RegisterAddrs rpc failed; will retry
periodically (code=5376, err=22)
use translate_et 5376 :
~: translate_et 5376
5376 (u).0 = no
Ok, so it's just calling the access routines, meaning, nothing in OpenAFS
changed. If you can tell us at which version of the kernel things start
breaking it would be probably an easy fix for us from there.
On 9/26/07, Dirk Heinrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Dienstag, 25. September 2007
On 9/27/07, John Hascall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a pointless discussion. We aren't going to break existing
deployments of AFS.
So all future releases of OpenAFS forever will support rxkad
and K4/DES-based tokens? And there will be no way for a cell
to turn that off?
On 9/27/07, John Hascall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We aren't going to break existing deployments of AFS.
So all future releases of OpenAFS forever will support rxkad
and K4/DES-based tokens? And there will be no way for a cell
to turn that off? Really?
You have the
On 9/28/07, Dirk Heinrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 26. September 2007 schrieb ext Derrick Brashear:
Ok, so it's just calling the access routines, meaning, nothing in
OpenAFS
changed. If you can tell us at which version of the kernel things start
breaking it would
On 9/29/07, ted creedon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like if ./configure --enable-transard-paths is set, binaries are
placed in both /usr/local/bin and /usr/afs/bin
ver 1.5.25 on AMD 64
sure. and?
/usr/afs: servers only
/usr/local: the whole tree
(also, make install is sort of
On 10/1/07, Jose Calhariz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have lost a fileserver because of a corruption on the reiserfs v3.
Something like 1000 volumes and 100GB of data were lost. The backups
were made using amanda with standard tar.
Of the raw fileserver partition or of walking /afs?
Well, what does vos listaddrs tell you?
On 10/4/07, Karl M. Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Found the sysid file, removed it, and rebooted. Still have the same
problems, though.
Where might other entries be and how should I go about clearing them up?
Thanks,
Karl
-Original
There was a bug in some older OpenAFS that would let 127.0.0.1 be
advertised. If you're not running something modern, upgrade.
Anyway, you can also put 127.0.0.1 in the NetRestrict file and restart,
masking it out from the list of advertised addresses.
On 10/5/07, Christopher D. Clausen [EMAIL
On 10/5/07, Christopher D. Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kim Kimball [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might also try
vos remove server partition volumename.readonly #for each
readonly instance
vos backup volumename
vos dump volumename.backup | vos restore server partition
If you can tell us which file or files when compiled with 4.2.1 are screwing
up, it would make it easier to be able to figure out what's going on.
On 10/5/07, Hans-Werner Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
on i386_linux26 I compiled the kernel 2.6.22.9 and OpenAFS 1.4.4
using the gcc
Omari Stephens confirmed this fixed a test system, and regardless it's
harmless, so we'll run with this.
Thanks!
On 10/7/07, Marc Dionne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Norbert Schuch wrote:
Hi,
Dirk Heinrichs-2 wrote:
I'm currently facing strange behaviour on one client machine, which
What kernel version on those clients?
You wacky kids and your excessive widereplies.
Anyway, if I have time to do testing, I will. Otherwise, if someone wants to
do a clean version of this, please do.
On 10/11/07, Carson Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hans-Werner Paulsen wrote:
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 01:15:00PM -0400, Marc
On 10/11/07, Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marc Dionne wrote:
Now I'm curious as to why the specific value returned by DirHash even
matters. Even with the gcc bug it would be consistent for a given
string on the same client. Does this value have to match what's
computed for
On 10/15/07, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Smith, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anyone recommend a server-side Antivirus product that provides
real-time (on write) server-side virus detection on my FS servers? My
AFS servers are all Debian Etch.
I'm pretty sure such a
On 10/17/07, Giovanni Bracco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you see the thread of the previous posting to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2007-January/024971.html
Giovanni
To be fair, instead of the minimal FUSE filesystem redirector, Arla uses its
own
On 10/17/07, Steve Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We had an AFS hang today (more detail after we complete the post-
mortem). It required doing a hard reboot on the server. On reboot, it
began salvaging the two partitions in parallel as normal. Wwhen the
salvages completed, it started
You want hostafsd. More work is forthcoming on it. Of course, publishing a
FUSE filesystem, why bother? You don't need to involve the kernel VFS (the
part that FUSE does) because... you're publishing it via the network to AFS
clients anyway.
On 10/17/07, Anthony Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/07, Steven Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/07, Kevin Hildebrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've actually had this need a number of times... Say for instance,
you've installed a new version of software in volume X for testing
purposes, or as Derrick suggests, using the
On 10/24/07, Harald Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also can reproduce this behavior.
Do all clients but the one you created the files on show identical file
dates?
i'll bet no.
On 10/24/07, Steven Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/07, Derrick Brashear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
not everyone has VMS.
*nod*, although it has been documented in public (at least some of the
pieces) for quite some time. It seems CMU takes a similar approach,
and I suspect
On 10/24/07, Lars Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harald Barth schrieb:
I also can reproduce this behavior.
Do all clients but the one you created the files on show identical file
dates?
Harald.
No.
All clients have different dates in the nanoseconds. All other values are
On 10/24/07, Steven Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/07, Derrick Brashear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
where's Phil so I can beat him up some more?
Heh. He's about 100 feet from where you got your most recent Mac.
But you'll have to get through Security unless you can lure him
On 10/24/07, Jim Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's an interesting nugget from LINUX/osi_vfsops.c:vattr2inode():
in 1.5. look at 1.4
On 10/24/07, Jeff Blaine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's my assumption that none of the 1.5 or 1.4
builds of OpenAFS at openafs.org are built to use
Kerberos 5.
You'll have to be more specific about what you mean by that.
MacOS X certainly includes a krb5 aklog.
On 10/24/07, Jeff Blaine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's my assumption that none of the 1.5 or 1.4
builds of OpenAFS at openafs.org are built to use
Kerberos 5.
(More specific)
Well, building OpenAFS for Kerberos 5 support requires
headers, libraries, and certain configure
On 10/25/07, Jeff Blaine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You had me wondering.
The only reference to afs2k5db I could find in source was
src/packaging/RedHat/openafs.spec.in
Which then leads me to:
Are the RedHat builds getting preferential treatment with
regard to this? Is there a
statement regarding kaserver).
It doesn't have to be referenced by the build process.
I wouldn't surprise me to find that nobody agrees with
me again.
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Derrick Brashear wrote:
On 10/25/07, *Jeff Blaine* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You
all aklog working tells you is that there's a key for afs/(cell) in your
krb5 database.
doesn't tell you a thing about whether it matches what your servers know
about.
On 10/26/07, Hamish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got openAFS 1.4.4 (RPM x86_64 downloaded from openafs.org) running on
On 10/29/07, Brian Gallew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Version of OpenAFS?
Version of Operating System?
It works correctly on Solaris8 (OpenAFS-1.2.11)
The problem is exhibited on two different linux systems (RHEL
AS4/OpenAFS-1.5.8 and Andrew FC3/1.3?) and a Solaris10
On 10/29/07, Jason Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Wilkinson wrote:
On 29 Oct 2007, at 18:15, Rich Sudlow wrote:
I found some source files missing from the FC srpms - I installed
the 1.4.4 srpms and then 1.4.5 on top and then it worked fine
for me for RH4.
That shouldn't be
The files referenced below
# Populate /usr/vice/etc
uve=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix}/vice/etc
install -p -m 644 src/packaging/RedHat/openafs-ThisCell $uve/ThisCell
install -p -m 644 %{SOURCE20} $uve/CellServDB.dist
install -p -m 644 src/packaging/RedHat/openafs-cacheinfo $uve/cacheinfo
I
On 10/31/07, Jeff Blaine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see a native way to run aklog once krb5 creds
are acquired. Is that true?
Any implementation tips would be great to hear.
You might ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED], i think a few of those people
don't read this list.
Probably now that
On 10/31/07, Smith, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All-
Can anyone recommend an OpenAFS module version and Linux kernel
version that are known to work on Linux/s390x? I am using Debian Etch
on s390x, and have tried both the 2.6.18 and 2.6.22 (from
etch-backports) kernels, with the OpenAFS
On 11/1/07, David Bear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been 3+ years since I installed openafs on a mac. The experience
then was less the possitive. I'm hoping to find an installation
readme somewhere to go over. I am not finding anything like that on
openafs.org. do I have to download the
On 11/1/07, David Bear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 12:25:58PM -0400, Derrick Brashear wrote:
On 11/1/07, David Bear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been 3+ years since I installed openafs on a mac. The experience
then was less the possitive. I'm hoping to find
in my source that's
vnode-dataVersion = 1;
(on line 257)
What's it in yours?
And really, don't cc openafs-bugs in mail to the list. Every reply doesn't
need its own ticket.
On 11/3/07, Adam Megacz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stack trace from core?
On 11/5/07, Dan Hyde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're seeing problems with our (patched) OpenAFS-1.4.2 threaded
fileservers. Here's what I know (those who want less detail should
skip to Core files):
There's an open ticket in RT, 74708, which is this issue. I don't have the
answer yet.
On Nov 6, 2007 11:56 AM, Andrej Filipcic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
openafs 1.5.26 for OSX 10.5 panics when stopping the afs service:
umount -f /afs
Is 1.4.5 a better choice?
Well, it's recommended. Is that not good enough? ;)
http://www.openafs.org/macos.html
On Nov 12, 2007 9:05 PM, Ron Croonenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok,
what rpm is the userspace one ?
openafs-client, just like he said.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Try uninstalling 1.4.4 and installing 1.4.5?
I'm unsure why that would happen, though.
On Nov 14, 2007 8:49 AM, Jon Boone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I downloaded the 1.4.5 .dmg and tried to install 1.4.5 on my
MacBook Pro (running Tiger). The system is already running 1.4.4. I
That should only apply if the receipt claims to be for the version
you're installing, but, it's worth a try.
On Nov 14, 2007 1:31 PM, Jim Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Derrick Brashear wrote:
Try uninstalling 1.4.4 and installing 1.4.5?
I'm unsure why that would happen, though
On Nov 16, 2007 2:09 PM, Richard Kellogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have installed OpenAFS-1.4.5-Leopard on an intel machine and a G5
PPC. No problems on intel, but on the G5 I get the following error
message on afs startup:
Nov 15 09:15:08 maccmskel1 com.apple.SystemStarter[58]: /Library/
As far as I know Time Machine wants hfs+ semantics, which AFS doesn't
have, so it's not going to work, period.
On Nov 19, 2007 10:53 AM, Moritz Bunse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I recently updated my Mac OS to Leopard and installed OpenAFS. I can
browse my AFS-cell. Now I want to use an
On Nov 19, 2007 11:24 AM, Sebastian Hagedorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On 19. November 2007 11:11:41 -0500 Derrick Brashear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As far as I know Time Machine wants hfs+ semantics, which AFS doesn't
have, so it's not going to work, period.
What you don't seem to know
The drawback to the atrpms rpms is that they're using the FHS style
paths.
Why is that a drawback (the question is sincere). While perhaps long
time users will need to rethink the paths they have to do so anyway on
a Linux system compared to AIX, Solaris etc. And any openafs
acceptance
On Nov 27, 2007 1:44 AM, Christof Hanke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Derrick Brashear wrote:
But let's make everybody happy: How about an rpmbuild time switch to
allow anyone to rebuild with their favourite path style. I would still
want to see FHS being the default, but transarc style
If you build without the authlibs rpm, you are asking to not have these.
Look at the change in the context below.
On Nov 28, 2007 11:20 AM, Dave Botsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are these files being removed, anyway?
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 05:03:41PM -0800, Darren Patterson wrote:
It
On Nov 28, 2007 3:20 PM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I'm working on solving an AFS issue that has been a problem at my
employer before I arrived here. Performance in general has been poor, much
slower than NFS. I ran bonnie++ to check this out and apparently
On Nov 28, 2007 11:03 PM, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Edgecombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
chapter1:
* about upgrading OS:
**Should the namei fileserver be mentioned? Is namei the
recommended way?
inode is still recommended for Solaris. namei is recommended
On Nov 29, 2007 5:58 AM, Lars Schimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I' ve updated our PowerPC Mac with latest available OpenAFS version for
PPC Mac OS X Tiger, which was 1.5.26.
For bad sake, MacOS X just went bad every shutdown and OpenAFS seems to
be the reason because of which MacOS X
On Nov 29, 2007 9:01 AM, Lars Schimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Derrick Brashear wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 5:58 AM, Lars Schimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I' ve updated our PowerPC Mac with latest available OpenAFS version for
PPC Mac OS X Tiger, which was 1.5.26.
For bad sake
On Nov 29, 2007 8:57 AM, Rob Banz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a cache partition, at least on other *ixes, the cache partition
has always needed special attention because of the way its used by
the
AFS kernel module. Certain care has to be taken as to do operations
in such a way
On Nov 29, 2007 10:31 AM, Helmut Jarausch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to resize (enlarge) the ext2-partition on which e.g.
/vicepa is mounted.
I know how to enlarge an ext2 partition using Linux tools,
but how does OpenAFS react to this situtation?
Does it use the additional
1 - 100 of 1047 matches
Mail list logo
