Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

1999-12-13 Thread Rob Cozens
And I do believe a partner has a responsibility to vote unless circumstances make it impossible to do so. Fine. As long as 'present' is an option on all votes. We're on the same page, Anthony: your "present" is my "abstain". Rob Cozens, CCW http://www.serendipitysoftware.com/who.html "And I,

Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

1999-12-13 Thread Rob Cozens
I'm also firmly against making voting a requirement for being a partner. Uli, Alain, et al: Just what responsibilities/obligations (if any) do partners have to the partnership? Is it just a free ride to participate when how one desires and shine it on when one feels like it? If I am going to

Re: Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

1999-12-12 Thread DeRobertis
At 12:48 PM -0500 on 12/11/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I didn't vote because I couldn't care less about it's name. Should of sent him a 'present' vote. That way we know people heard about the vote.

Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

1999-12-12 Thread M. Uli Kusterer
Alain: I knew you were away for a while, Adrian. Had I been a little less busy, it might have occurred to me to notify you by personal E-mail that a FreeCard vote was in progress. Perhaps we should include in our voting process a personal-notification of all members among the lessons learned with

Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

1999-12-12 Thread M. Uli Kusterer
Hmm, I think the one thing that is wrong with MC's interface is the fact that it uses palettes. They just get in the way. I much prefer HC's semi-modal (can still switch to a different app) dialog interface. I will see if I can do up a design for the interface I imagine soon, but I can make no

Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

1999-12-11 Thread Rob Cozens
I would hate to think that my absense for a couple of weeks means that I cannot become a partner Hi Adrian, I most certainly wouldn't want that to happen, Adrian My goal was to use the name vote to also resolve a first cut in establishing candidates for partnership. Since I did not offer this

Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

1999-12-11 Thread Rob Cozens
Alain: It had not occurred to me that responsibility of voting would be interpreted as a prerequisite that no one ever miss a vote, or risk losing partnership status. Your above statement conveys much better what I was thinking. You too, eh Rob ? Alain, et al: I saw voting on the name as a

Re: Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

1999-12-11 Thread MP0werd
In a message dated 12/11/99 12:13:52 PM, you wrote: Frankly, I was surprised that only six votes were cast (BTW, Uli, I have not received confirmation that I voted). My thought was, "why should people who aren't committed enough to this project to express an opinion receive a partnership?". I

Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

1999-12-10 Thread Rob Cozens
Or do you disagree that voting should be a responsibility of partnership? If I was picky, I'd say voting is a right, and whoever sees it as a responsibility should move into a dictature for a few years to find out why. But I'm not, and I don't want to start another discussion like that on

OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

1999-12-10 Thread Paul Sutton
Uli: how the editor windows should be layouted (I'd suggest moving away from HC's modal dialogs and heading more for palettes), anything. Hmm, I think the one thing that is wrong with MC's interface is the fact that it uses palettes. They just get in the way. I much prefer HC's semi-modal

Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

1999-12-10 Thread DeRobertis
At 12:16 AM +0100 on 12/10/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote: If you feel better that way, e-mail that stuff to me and I'll take care of the hassles of placing it on the web site so others on the list can examine the designs. And make sure not to mail him any uncompressed, 8.5x11 600ppi 24-bit TIFF

Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

1999-12-10 Thread M. Uli Kusterer
I will say though, this is a partnership, not a political democracy. All I was asking for was the names of the people who voted, not how they voted. In most partnerships and governing councils voting is not secret: each partner/member looks the others in the eye and declares "Yea", "Nea", or "I

Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

1999-12-09 Thread M. Uli Kusterer
Or do you disagree that voting should be a responsibility of partnership? If I was picky, I'd say voting is a right, and whoever sees it as a responsibility should move into a dictature for a few years to find out why. But I'm not, and I don't want to start another discussion like that on

Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

1999-12-09 Thread M. Uli Kusterer
Uli, as keeper of the vote can you tell us who has voted? It's possible (though not likely) that someone's vote got lost in cyberspace and there are seven or eight people who believe they are members of the "magnificent six." Rob, I will not send a list of the people who voted to the list.

Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

1999-12-08 Thread Rob Cozens
Rob Cozens : Sorry I didn't get back on this in a timely manner... What I wanted to suggest was that the vote be extended a few days ... Alain: While I am quite satisfied with FreeCard, I have no objections to extending the vote. Rob Cozens : ..with the understanding that participating in group

Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

1999-12-08 Thread DeRobertis
At 10:24 PM +0100 on 12/7/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote: Alain: While I am quite satisfied with FreeCard, I have no objections to extending the vote. Folks, the vote ran over two weeks. I think who didn't vote in that amount of time didn't want to ... I'm not sure I'm all for going around and

OODL: Names - FreeCard and FreeScript

1999-12-07 Thread Alain Farmer
Julian Blackhirst : Does our script language have to end in "talk"? So many already do that a beginner could become confused and it makes you think it is associated with speech software. Why not call it "FreeScript", or something else. Anthony : I agree! And it sounds _much_ better, too. Alain

Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

1999-12-07 Thread M. Uli Kusterer
Alain: While I am quite satisfied with FreeCard, I have no objections to extending the vote. Folks, the vote ran over two weeks. I think who didn't vote in that amount of time didn't want to ... I'm not sure I'm all for going around and extending votes, as we've already cancelled the vote

Re: OODL: Names and PowerCard Externals

1999-11-03 Thread M. Uli Kusterer
Uli : I actually once made an XCMD collection of this name (PowerCard), but I never released them. Alain: Sounds .. interesting! Alain: Do you still have them? What do they do? ... Alain, it was just a few Xes; xPrompt, ShowBalloon and one to get a stack's pathname (obsolete from the

Re: OODL: Names, licencing, partners

1999-11-02 Thread DeRobertis
At 9:18 PM +0100 on 10/31/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote: It means: The power supply on the nice, old, Sun server I was given arced, I get to fix it, and I think the VolksCard name is loony. Anthony, either I refuse to get the insult, or I don't get the connection between a server's trafo and the

Re: OODL: Names, licencing, partners

1999-11-01 Thread Adrian Sutton
And externals writtin in Java would be _real_ neat. Hmmm... sounds like a good use for Java. Please, please, please don't even think about writing externals in Java. The java VM takes up about 5Mb of RAM and takes too long to load (G3 300Mhz). The first (and possible all) call to an external

Re: OODL: Names

1999-11-01 Thread Rob Cozens
Anyway, you're probably right. That you have these bad associations is proof enough to me that others might have them, too, Hmm... I've always been told that it was actually started by the Nazi's. Time to go find a good history book. Anthony, Uli, et al: As the son of a US B-17 pilot and born

OODL: Names and PowerCard Externals

1999-11-01 Thread Alain Farmer
Uli : Anyway, you're probably right. That you have these bad associations is proof enough to me that others might have them, too, so we'd better settle for another one. Alain: We have been out-voted, eh! Uli: Still, here's my list of new ones that I like: Joker (it's a "wildcard") Cardz

Re: Re: Re: Re: OODL: Names - Feedback

1999-10-31 Thread DeRobertis
At 9:04 PM -0400 on 10/30/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Much code I have seen disagrees with you. Much of the code you've seen is old. Probably. I think I've seen some new stuff like that, too, though. Maybe from some diehard goto users. Overloading is C++, not C, right? Yes.

Re: OODL: Names, licencing, partners

1999-10-31 Thread DeRobertis
At 5:37 PM +0100 on 10/30/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote: I think you've all blown a transformer or something. Anthony, excuse me? It means: The power supply on the nice, old, Sun server I was given arced, I get to fix it, and I think the VolksCard name is loony. And externals writtin in Java

Re: OODL: Names

1999-10-31 Thread DeRobertis
At 5:45 PM +0100 on 10/30/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote: Anyway, you're probably right. That you have these bad associations is proof enough to me that others might have them, too, Hmm... I've always been told that it was actually started by the Nazi's. Time to go find a good history book.

Re: OODL: Names, licencing, partners

1999-10-31 Thread M. Uli Kusterer
It means: The power supply on the nice, old, Sun server I was given arced, I get to fix it, and I think the VolksCard name is loony. Anthony, either I refuse to get the insult, or I don't get the connection between a server's trafo and the VolksCard name ... (pick one, please) I hope so too.

Re: OODL: Names, licencing, partners

1999-10-31 Thread M. Uli Kusterer
I think you've all blown a transformer or something. Anthony, excuse me? Alain: It doesn't seem likely to me. Externals that make calls to the Mac Toolbox are surely impossible to port, unless you re-code those parts of the toolbox that you will need (I suppose). I'd say we should export

Re: OODL: Names

1999-10-30 Thread DeRobertis
At 6:00 PM -0700 on 10/25/99, Alain Farmer wrote: Here is a page containing most of the names that have been floating around the list : http://ufp.uqam.ca/OpenCard/OpenKardNames.html Alain, the webserver is spitting out a 403 permission denied error.

Re: OODL: Names, licencing, partners

1999-10-30 Thread DeRobertis
At 3:09 PM -0700 on 10/26/99, Alain Farmer wrote: Eric: Also nu in french means naked, so i do not think nuCard is such a good idea... Alain: On the contrary, a name like that would probably attract their attention, as evidenced by its preponderance in advertising, eh! ;-) And it comes with

Re: OODL: Names - Feedback

1999-10-30 Thread DeRobertis
At 6:29 PM -0700 on 10/26/99, Alain Farmer wrote: Alain: BASIC is closer to being a "real" programming language than HyperTalk is. HyperTalk is a _far_ better language than basic. Basic has many--um--design problems, to say the least.

Re: Re: OODL: Names - Feedback

1999-10-30 Thread MP0werd
In a message dated 10/30/99 3:48:40 AM, you wrote: HyperTalk is a _far_ better language than basic. Basic has many--um--design problems, to say the least. Design problems! WHY! I'll teach you to badmouth BASIC! *Punch* *Uppercut* There, that suits you right! To tell you the truth, the only

Re: Re: OODL: Names - Feedback

1999-10-30 Thread DeRobertis
At 4:55 AM -0400 on 10/30/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Design problems! WHY! I'll teach you to badmouth BASIC! *Punch* *Uppercut* That wasn't very nice of you... *Electrodes* *b-zap!* :-) There, that suits you right! To tell you the truth, the only thing that I find BASIC to lack is the

Re: Re: Re: OODL: Names - Feedback

1999-10-30 Thread MP0werd
In a message dated 10/30/99 10:40:59 AM, you wrote: There, that suits you right! To tell you the truth, the only thing that I find BASIC to lack is the ability to make a data type, and to do sizeof(). Lacking data types is a major problem, IMO. Sizeof is not so bad. Also bad is the need for

Re: Re: Re: OODL: Names - Feedback

1999-10-30 Thread DeRobertis
At 2:45 PM -0400 on 10/30/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 10/30/99 10:40:59 AM, you wrote: There, that suits you right! To tell you the truth, the only thing that I find BASIC to lack is the ability to make a data type, and to do sizeof(). Lacking data types is a major problem,

Re: Re: Re: Re: OODL: Names - Feedback

1999-10-30 Thread MP0werd
Much code I have seen disagrees with you. Much of the code you've seen is old. First, GOSUB replaced it, but it didn't allow local variables, so SUB replaced gosub, which functions exactly like a C function. Without user defined, overloaded types, etc. Overloading is C++, not C, right?

OODL: Names

1999-10-28 Thread Alain Farmer
Julian Blackhirst: Here are some names i came up with: AuthorCard, HyperBuilder, RapidCard, UniCard, MultimediaCard, RebelCard, FreedomCard, HarmonyCard, HyperStack, StudioCard, PaxCard, HyperDev, MaxCard, WildCard, WildMedia Alain: Thank you Julian. Your name suggestions have been added to our

Re: [OODL: Names, licencing, partners]

1999-10-27 Thread eric-engle
Regarding Tax Law in Quebec: If it is pertinent to this project, let me know/ask. Basically the Canadian tax system is pretty similar to the US system except for the VAT. I am happy to research this if needed for this project. Has anyone contacted Eric Chatonnet (sp?) He has written a few books

Re: [OODL: Names, licencing, partners]

1999-10-27 Thread Julian Blackhirst
Here are some names i came up with: AuthorCard (have to see if its taken or not) HyperBuilder RapidCard UniCard (as in universal) MultimediaCard (MM-Card for short) RebelCard FreedomCard HarmonyCard HyperStack (a bit boring) StudioCard PaxCard HyperDev

Re: [OODL: Names]

1999-10-26 Thread eric-engle
my 2 cents... i like both hyperRAD and freeRADICALS um, a lot. Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1

OODL: Names

1999-10-26 Thread Alain Farmer
Eric: I agree that whatever name is chosen should 'link' to HC, but if it could also link to www so much the better. Alain: Agreed on both counts. I will nonetheless put up a page of naming-guidelines that members of our group will be able to vote on. Eric: (since, i think the HC interface