Mark Rauterkus: Other have stated (I'm in
disagreement)
Alain: In my humble opinion, we need to be unanimous
on the fundamentals, and we can settle for
majorities
of varying degrees for the less fundamental issues.
Mark Rauterkus: Can you detail all the "fundamentals"
in full view ...
Hi,
When I say, "STRICT CONSENSUS" that also means UNAMINITY. Sure, I give into
the notion that a soft consensus is possible without 100% agreement. A
"strict consensus" is NOT the same as a non-strict consensus, or plain old
consensus.
I don't mean to split hairs. I do welcome the
