Re: Re: OODL: Re: Remote Linux Configuration Project

2000-01-14 Thread MP0werd
At 5:37 PM +0100 on 1/13/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote: Who does what? Get the NNTP stuff up and running. We need someone who takes care of it. Any volunteers? I guess I'm probabably doing it, being one of the few supporters. I volunteer to help.

Re: OODL: Re: Remote Linux Configuration Project

2000-01-13 Thread DeRobertis
At 12:03 AM +0100 on 1/10/00, M. Uli Kusterer wrote: Hmmm... I have an idea for our mailing list: How about going to NNTP? We could run INN on the box. AFAIK, the interface of MTNW is _far_ better for the types of discussions we have than Eudora (or any other mail client). Imagine -- real

Re: OODL: Re: Remote Linux Configuration Project

2000-01-13 Thread DeRobertis
At 11:35 PM +1000 on 1/9/00, Paul Sutton wrote: Anthony: How about going to NNTP? Mark: No thanks. Adrian: I'm with you on this. If you want threading, gateway this list to that one on NNTP. Adrian: NNTP threading isn't all it's cracked up to be. We often change the topic of the conversation

Re: OODL: Re: Remote Linux Configuration Project

2000-01-09 Thread DeRobertis
At 10:29 PM -0500 on 1/9/00, Mark Rauterkus wrote: Now, back to regular on-topic talk. Sorry to go off-topic. Just had to vent. Heh. Youy think that's bad... just go search the archive for my message after Windows Media Player screwed up one of my disks...

Re: OODL: Re: Remote Linux Configuration Project

2000-01-09 Thread Paul Sutton
Anthony: How about going to NNTP? Mark: No thanks. Adrian: I'm with you on this. If you want threading, gateway this list to that one on NNTP. Adrian: NNTP threading isn't all it's cracked up to be. We often change the topic of the conversation and should at that point change the subject,

Re: OODL: Re: Remote Linux Configuration Project

2000-01-08 Thread DeRobertis
At 6:55 PM -0800 on 1/8/00, Alain Farmer wrote: Adrian: How about going to NNTP? Alain: I am not against the idea but, when I suggested something similar several months ago, the suggestion was flatly rejected. Primarily due to problems solved by running a single server. Remember, back then I