Why don't we use wxWindows which already has
a cross platform implementation?
It's just as powerful as MFC and it has a
license which is essentially LGPL.
http://www.wxwindows.org/
-- Michael --
MFC is Microsoft's Foundation Classes. Sort of like their Toolbox for C++.
It's the only means
Why don't we use wxWindows which already has
a cross platform implementation?
It's just as powerful as MFC and it has a
license which is essentially LGPL.
http://www.wxwindows.org/
Michael,
I think we already had it under consideration ... I think back then we
downed it because it's so large
At 10:10 PM +0100 on 12/23/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
but most of the stuff will still need to be
cross-platform juggling of an abstraction layer between us and
MFC/Toolbox/KDE/whatever.
We could use, say, GTK which will work on both Linux and Windows.
At 11:22 AM -0800 on 12/23/99, Alain Farmer wrote:
Anthony: I _hate_ the FCC.
Alain: What have they ever done to you, Anthony?
Given far less choice in the marketplace, for years enforced a telephone
monopoly, a few times tried to regulate the internet, jacked up phone
bills, etc.
At 2:21 PM -0800 on 12/23/99, Alain Farmer wrote:
And what happens if you have two buttons that
overlap
each other and you click the one that is partially
covered? Will it appear to "jump forward" then, like
a
Macintosh control? Or will it just highlight the
parts
that are visible, like a
At 8:41 AM + on 12/24/99, Michael Fair wrote:
Why don't we use wxWindows which already has
a cross platform implementation?
It's just as powerful as MFC and it has a
license which is essentially LGPL.
http://www.wxwindows.org/
We've discussed it before. I think we might be able to defeat
Hi,
Why not just FreeCard.org? [is it not availible?]
Its not available. The domains that are include some our enemies might
desire. (FWIW, Tis a 'Baa Humbug' kinda joke I guess.):
CARDFREE.NET CARDFREE.ORG
Of course, there was the list I sent prior -- all available.
Mark Rauterkus
