This is needed by gtk+4 recipe
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libxkbcommon_1.4.1.bb | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libxkbcommon_1.4.1.bb
b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libxkbcommon_1.4.1.bb
index
Needed by gtk4
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/xkeyboard-config_2.37.bb | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/xkeyboard-config_2.37.bb
b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/xkeyboard-config_2.37.bb
index
Needed by gtk4
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
meta/recipes-support/iso-codes/iso-codes_4.12.0.bb | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/iso-codes/iso-codes_4.12.0.bb
b/meta/recipes-support/iso-codes/iso-codes_4.12.0.bb
index ea7c43cdae..1c884a1174 100644
---
Ping, any comments on this?
On 11/21/22 1:20 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
From: Mark Hatle
Some vendor versions of QEMU may be on older versions that do not have
qmp.legacy, but instead of qmp. Default to the integrated library
versions, fall back to the older one and then if neither is available
Some distributions (NI LinuxRT) provide both busybox-lsof and
full-featured lsof implementations. When users install the full-featured
lsof package, the full-binary fails to replace the bbox-binary in PATH,
because `lsof` contains no update-alternatives logic.
Inherit the update-alternatives
Hi Alex, Richard,
Any updates on reviewing this patch?
Thanks,
Sandeep
On 11/3/2022 2:09 PM, Gundlupet Raju, Sandeep wrote:
Hello,
Any updates on reviewing this patch?
Thanks,
Sandeep
On 10/27/2022 8:17 PM, Sandeep Gundlupet Raju wrote:
libkms library is deprecated in 2.4.111 version.
The tests are packaged into the main glibc-tests package which is fine,
but then glibc-tests-ptest package needs to depend on that.
Which is what this commit addresses.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin
---
meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-tests_2.36.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin
---
...add-more-elements-in-test_determinis.patch | 27 +++
.../recipes-devtools/python/python3_3.11.0.bb | 1 +
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Valgrind build itself with -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 on that
target (and the tests expect that). On the other hand, we enable
SSE instructions, which expect things to be aligned on 16 byte
boundary (e.g. -mpreferred-stack-boundary=4). This won't be
reported at compile time and results in
The execution times were checked from
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/non-release/20221127-2/testresults/qemux86-64-ptest/core-image-ptest-all/log.do_testimage.40537.20221127010849
and ptests were moved both ways according to the same criteria:
more than 30 seconds or less.
openssl is dropped
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 9:36 PM Markus Volk wrote:
>
> Am Do, 1. Dez 2022 um 11:44:16 -0800 schrieb Khem Raj :
>
> build for qemuriscv32 to find out.
>
>
> mesa 22.3.0 did compile for qemuriscv32 without errors
OK. Thanks for checking.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent
Hi Steve/Team,
Yes, this is mistake from my side.
I noticed that mistake and I'm sincerely sorry for that issue.
I'll look back for the patch to correct those issue .
I'll be more careful for any future patches .
Regards,
Hitendra
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022, 8:17 pm Steve Sakoman, wrote:
> On Thu,
Hi Richard,
When I was trying to figure out a way to solve the problem, I found that with a
single line change, things will just work fine.
-bb.build.addtask('do_rm_work', 'do_build', ' '.join(deps), d)
+bb.build.addtask('do_rm_work', 'do_build do_rm_work_all', '
'.join(deps),
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 6:35 PM Hitendra Prajapati
wrote:
>
> Hi team,
>
> Why this issue is unattended ?? Any issue in merged ??
>
> Please look at this issue, Which fixed for Go package .
I sent you a private email when I noticed you were changing the author
on CVE patches, but it seems you
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in X.org Server. Affected
by this vulnerability is the function _GetCountedString of the file
xkb/xkb.c. The manipulation leads to buffer overflow. It is recommended to
apply a patch to fix this issue. The associated identifier of this
vulnerability
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 09:55:37AM +, Matsunaga-Shinji wrote:
> Hi, I'm Shinji.
>
> I have a question about the judgment result of the CVE check tool.
>
> If the version of the package "pv" cannot be compared to the version
> retrieved from NVD("version_start" or "version_end"),
>
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 09:55:37AM +, Matsunaga-Shinji wrote:
> Hi, I'm Shinji.
>
> I have a question about the judgment result of the CVE check tool.
>
> If the version of the package "pv" cannot be compared to the version
> retrieved from NVD("version_start" or "version_end"),
>
On 11/30/22 06:28, Randy MacLeod wrote:
On 2022-11-29 10:52, Ross Burton via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
On 28 Nov 2022, at 09:25, Alexander Kanavin via
lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 at 14:39, Xiangyu Chen
wrote:
* add libgcc in RDEPENDS flag to solve testing
Hi, I'm Shinji.
I have a question about the judgment result of the CVE check tool.
If the version of the package "pv" cannot be compared to the version retrieved
from NVD("version_start" or "version_end"),
there is a vulnerability for which the judgment result is "Patched".(e.g.
Upstream-Status: Backport from
https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/commit/bff38efe8c110469c5080d387bec62a6ca15b1a5
Signed-off-by: Hitendra Prajapati
---
.../libarchive/CVE-2022-36227.patch | 42 +++
.../libarchive/libarchive_3.6.1.bb| 4 +-
2 files
On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 09:07 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 at 16:45, Stephen Jolley
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > We’d welcome a proposal/series on how to move forward with
> > > > > > > > the Y2038 work for 32 bit platforms.
> > > >
> > > > I have the following
Hi Martin/Team,
Yes, I missed that part.
It is my mistake. I'm extremely sorry for that.
I'll correct the patch and resubmit.
Regards,
Hitendra Prajapati
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022, 1:19 pm Martin Jansa, wrote:
>
>> +From afa85b75607649f3a89cb4d17cf3f003738d3576 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> +From:
Hi Martin/Team,
Yes, I missed that part.
It is my mistake. I'm extremely sorry for that.
I'll take care of it in next patches.
Regards,
Hitendra Prajapati
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022, 1:11 pm Martin Jansa, wrote:
> I see the same fixes with correct Author in .patch files (please don't
> change the
23 matches
Mail list logo
