Hi,
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Andrea Galbusera giz...@gmail.com wrote:
* based on recipe by Radoslav Kolev which was in classic
* updated to latest released version 3.0.2
* v2 drops git version of recipe
* v2 drops no longer used PRIORITY
Signed-off-by: Andrea Galbusera
Signed-off-by: Radek Dostal r...@radekdostal.com
---
meta-oe/recipes-multimedia/libopus/libopus-fpu.inc |6 ++
.../recipes-multimedia/libopus/libopus_0.9.10.bb | 20
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 05-05-12 17:51, Andrea Galbusera schreef:
* based on recipe by Radoslav Kolev which was in classic * updated to
latest released version 3.0.2 * v2 drops git version of recipe * v2 drops
no longer used PRIORITY
Signed-off-by: Andrea Galbusera
Hello,
openembedded-core only features udev-164 (vs. -182 in meta-oe). -164
in oe-core does not use libkmod, so there's no issue with libkmod in
oe-core. It's no surprise that it worked for you, you were building
anicent tools.
I know. I were asking why versions are setup like this. If
Hello Khem,
I've got an issue with
openembedded-core/meta/recipes-kernel/kmod/kmod_git.bb, with the way
{libdir} is set in line 19:
libdir = ${base_libdir}
git blame claims this was added by Khem Raj on 2012-05-08. This line
causes libkmod to put its pkgconfig .pc file in the staging area
On 05/15/12 10:39, Thilo Fromm wrote:
Hello Khem,
I've got an issue with
openembedded-core/meta/recipes-kernel/kmod/kmod_git.bb, with the way
{libdir} is set in line 19:
libdir = ${base_libdir}
git blame claims this was added by Khem Raj on 2012-05-08. This line
causes libkmod to put its
Hi,
I'm running a project using OE-classic.
I have a recipe (call it xxx) that uses autotools and builds a package
successfully for target. This recipe uses a custom do_install to extract
relevant files from the source, e.g. include files for the dev package.
I have now tried to build a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 14-05-12 19:42, Marko Lindqvist schreef:
On 14 May 2012 20:23, Thilo Fromm fr...@dresearch-fe.de wrote:
openembedded-core only features udev-164 (vs. -182 in meta-oe). -164 in
oe-core does not use libkmod, so there's no issue with libkmod in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 15-05-12 10:41, Martin Ertsås schreef:
On 05/15/12 10:39, Thilo Fromm wrote:
Hello Khem,
I've got an issue with
openembedded-core/meta/recipes-kernel/kmod/kmod_git.bb, with the
way {libdir} is set in line 19:
libdir = ${base_libdir}
On Tuesday 15 May 2012 03:02:08 Marko Lindqvist wrote:
Do you maintain any kind of list of freely available recipes provided
by third parties? If I need some library for which there is no recipe
in openembedded-core or meta-openembedded, I'd like to check if
someone else has already made it
Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@googlemail.com
---
.../gnome-settings-daemon_2.32.1.bb|6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
a/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-settings-daemon/gnome-settings-daemon_2.32.1.bb
After including meta-chromium configure of gnome-settings-daemon detects nss
and fails during compile with
| In file included from gsd-smartcard-manager.h:27:0,
| from gsd-smartcard-manager.c:25:
| gsd-smartcard.h:26:20: fatal error: secmod.h: No such file or directory
|
Thanks to Jaap de Jong and Khem Raj for reporing the problem and suggesting the
fix.
Signed-off-by: Jan Luebbe j...@pengutronix.de
---
recipes-core/llvm/llvm2.8/add-unistd.patch | 12
recipes-core/llvm/llvm2.8_2.8.bb |3 +++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
create
On system with large amounts of RAM (such as 96GB), the default
initial heap size is larger than the max heap size specified in
some build commands. Set min_heap to the max_heap value in those
cases instead.
Signed-off-by: Jan Luebbe j...@pengutronix.de
---
Hello Koen,
thanks for helping out with this.
I've got an issue with
openembedded-core/meta/recipes-kernel/kmod/kmod_git.bb, with the
way {libdir} is set in line 19:
libdir = ${base_libdir}
git blame claims this was added by Khem Raj on 2012-05-08. This
line causes libkmod to put its
Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@googlemail.com
---
.../files/0001-Fix-glib-includes.patch | 101
.../gnome-system-monitor_2.28.2.bb |2 +
2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
On 05/14/2012 11:24 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Tasslehoff Kjappfot
tasskj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I have made a rootfs and an SDK with OE-classic. We use the SDK to
compile our own application, which links dynamically with some open
source libraries.
I have listed
Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@googlemail.com
---
.../florence/files/0001-Fix-glib-includes.patch| 33
meta-oe/recipes-support/florence/florence_0.5.1.bb |5 ++-
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
On Tuesday 15 May 2012 13:35:24 Tasslehoff Kjappfot wrote:
I've already written that I use OpenEmbedded as a build system, and
included the MIT license. I also used create_manifest.sh from Arago to
get a list of everything included in the rootfs. What I really wonder is
if I must add all that
Hi,
with the latest layer master heads I get the following error on
building chromium:
g++ '-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64' '-DNO_TCMALLOC' '-DDISABLE_NACL'
'-DCHROMIUM_BUILD' '-DUSE_NSS=1' '-DTOOLKIT_USES_GTK=1'
'-DGTK_DISABLE_SINGLE_INCLUDES=1' '-DWEBUI_TASK_MANAGER=1'
'-DENABLE_REMOTING=1'
Hi All,
there are a number of packages having a broken SRC_URI, for example git.
Has someone met this issue?
For sure we can correct those links adding a dedicated .bbappend file for
each failing package but
I think we could also update the main package fixing the errors.
What's your idea?
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 03:02:37PM +0200, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Hi All,
there are a number of packages having a broken SRC_URI, for example git.
Has someone met this issue?
For sure we can correct those links adding a dedicated .bbappend file for
each failing package but
I think we
On 2012-05-15 07:02, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Hi All,
there are a number of packages having a broken SRC_URI, for example git.
Has someone met this issue?
For sure we can correct those links adding a dedicated .bbappend file for
each failing package but
I think we could also update the main
For example building git-1.7.7 fails fetching the source.
2012/5/15 Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com
On 2012-05-15 07:02, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Hi All,
there are a number of packages having a broken SRC_URI, for example git.
Has someone met this issue?
For sure we can correct those
On 2012-05-15 07:19, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
For example building git-1.7.7 fails fetching the source.
Works fine for me:
$ wget http://git-core.googlecode.com/files/git-1.7.7.tar.gz
--2012-05-15 07:29:43-- http://git-core.googlecode.com/files/git-1.7.7.tar.gz
Resolving
That's right, but why the git.inc contains a undownloadable url?
This can create a mistake in my opinion.
2012/5/15 Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com
On 2012-05-15 07:19, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
For example building git-1.7.7 fails fetching the source.
Works fine for me:
$ wget
On Tuesday 15 May 2012 15:36:37 Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
On Tuesday 15 May 2012 07:30:48 Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-05-15 07:19, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
For example building git-1.7.7 fails fetching the source.
Works fine for me:
...
That's right, but why the git.inc contains a
Le 15-May-12, Martin Jansa a écrit:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 03:02:37PM +0200, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Hi All,
there are a number of packages having a broken SRC_URI, for example git.
Has someone met this issue?
For sure we can correct those links adding a dedicated .bbappend file
Hello,
I'm trying to remove an element from DISTRO_FEATURES (specifically
ld-is-gold), but I am unable to find the right spot to do it. The
distribution we're using (Angstrom, as it happens) sets this in
conf/distro/angstrom-v2012.x.conf. My machine configuration is the
wrong spot to modify
On Tuesday 15 May 2012 18:12:35 Thilo Fromm wrote:
I'm trying to remove an element from DISTRO_FEATURES (specifically
ld-is-gold), but I am unable to find the right spot to do it. The
distribution we're using (Angstrom, as it happens) sets this in
conf/distro/angstrom-v2012.x.conf. My machine
Hello,
I'm trying to remove an element from DISTRO_FEATURES (specifically
ld-is-gold), but I am unable to find the right spot to do it. The
distribution we're using (Angstrom, as it happens) sets this in
conf/distro/angstrom-v2012.x.conf. My machine configuration is the
wrong spot to modify
* based on recipe by Radoslav Kolev which was in classic
* updated to latest released version 3.0.2
v2:
* drop git version of recipe
* drop no longer used PRIORITY
v3:
* drop PR = r0
Signed-off-by: Andrea Galbusera giz...@gmail.com
---
.../recipes-extended/libmodbus/libmodbus_3.0.2.bb
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:44:10PM +0200, Thilo Fromm wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to remove an element from DISTRO_FEATURES (specifically
ld-is-gold), but I am unable to find the right spot to do it. The
distribution we're using (Angstrom, as it happens) sets this in
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 05:23:43PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Tuesday 15 May 2012 18:12:35 Thilo Fromm wrote:
I'm trying to remove an element from DISTRO_FEATURES (specifically
ld-is-gold), but I am unable to find the right spot to do it. The
distribution we're using (Angstrom, as it
Hi,
looks like you are building on 64bit machine and you do not have installed
the ia32 compat-dev libs. chromium builds some parts for the js engine natively
and that needs to be 32bit.
bye Henning
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Hi all,
Am 10.05.2012 23:41, schrieb Philip Balister:
I encourage anyone involved in OpenEmbedded who can get to Linuxtag for
even a day to help it. It is a really fun time, and Berlin is a really
nice place to visit.
unluckily there was not much of feedback so far :-(
We have a deadline for
Hi Koen
Since meta-oe is not branched for denzil this patch removes the old
components in there for toolchain recipes. I have left gcc 4.6 in there
for now since OE-Core still have those recipes.
The following changes since commit 14869e500c1a2f6be4704bf7399435fda00dc34c:
klibc: upgrade to
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 03:01:42PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
Hi Koen
Since meta-oe is not branched for denzil this patch removes the old
Did you mean is now branched above?
Since 4.6/4.7 is now seems to work fine for me:
Acked-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com
components in there for
Hello,
The attached patch updates the SRC_URI since mirrors.ibiblio.org seems
to be down. The patch is targeted at oe-classic.
Apelete Seketeli (1):
libecj-bootstrap: Update SRC_URI to archive.eclipse.org
recipes/ecj/libecj-bootstrap_3.6.1.bb |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
This updates SRC_URI to archive.eclipse.org since mirrors.ibiblio.org
seems to be down.
Signed-off-by: Apelete Seketeli apel...@seketeli.net
---
recipes/ecj/libecj-bootstrap_3.6.1.bb |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/recipes/ecj/libecj-bootstrap_3.6.1.bb
Hello All,
My board has a eth0 and wireless interfaces. I manually executed the
following commands to configured my network interfaces:
1. ifconfig eth0 192.168.3.139 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
2. ifconfig wlan0:1 inet 169.254.6.199 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast
169.254.255.255 up
My Routing
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 03:34:56PM -0700, John Tobias wrote:
Hello All,
My board has a eth0 and wireless interfaces. I manually executed the
following commands to configured my network interfaces:
1. ifconfig eth0 192.168.3.139 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
2. ifconfig wlan0:1 inet
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 03:01:42PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
Hi Koen
Since meta-oe is not branched for denzil this patch removes the old
Did you mean is now branched above?
Yes indeed it was a typo
Since 4.6/4.7 is now seems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 15-05-12 18:12, Thilo Fromm schreef:
Hello,
I'm trying to remove an element from DISTRO_FEATURES (specifically
ld-is-gold), but I am unable to find the right spot to do it. The
distribution we're using (Angstrom, as it happens) sets this in
44 matches
Mail list logo
