Re: [oe] [PATCH] rename SOC_FAMILY to TARGET_SOC_FAMILY and make it global

2010-09-12 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 10:11 Sun 12 Sep , Koen Kooi wrote: On 04-09-10 05:14, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: add global OVERRIDES ${TARGET_SOC_FAMILY} and ${TARGET_ARCH}_${TARGET_SOC_FAMILY} NAK, introducing a new override that combines 2 existing overrides with a '_', is not allowed

Re: [oe] [PATCH] rename SOC_FAMILY to TARGET_SOC_FAMILY and make it global

2010-09-07 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 09:43 Tue 07 Sep , Maupin, Chase wrote: add global OVERRIDES ${TARGET_SOC_FAMILY} and ${TARGET_ARCH}_${TARGET_SOC_FAMILY} For my part I would ask why you are renaming SOC_FAMILY to TARGET_SOC_FAMILY? Why not leave the name the way it is since others may be using it in overlays,

[oe] How to extend SRC_URI_append?

2010-09-03 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Hi, I'm currently working on the adding of a sub SH arch the st40 for this I've define the SOC_FAMILY as SOC_FAMILY=st40 but now I want to apply some patch to gcc, binutils and others via SRC_URI_append_st40 or SRC_URI_append_sh_st40 how can i do it?

Re: [oe] How to extend SRC_URI_append?

2010-09-03 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 07:44 Fri 03 Sep , Chris Larson wrote: The append syntax you're referring to uses OVERRIDES. FOO_somevalue replaces FOO if somevalue is in OVERRIDES. FOO_append_somevalue is added to FOO if somevalue is in OVERRIDES. I don't think SOC_FAMILY is in overrides at this time. how can I

Re: [oe] How to extend SRC_URI_append?

2010-09-03 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 18:47 Fri 03 Sep , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 07:44 Fri 03 Sep , Chris Larson wrote: The append syntax you're referring to uses OVERRIDES. FOO_somevalue replaces FOO if somevalue is in OVERRIDES. FOO_append_somevalue is added to FOO if somevalue is in OVERRIDES

[oe] [PATCH] rename SOC_FAMILY to TARGET_SOC_FAMILY and make it global

2010-09-03 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
add global OVERRIDES ${TARGET_SOC_FAMILY} and ${TARGET_ARCH}_${TARGET_SOC_FAMILY} Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com --- classes/base.bbclass |4 ++-- conf/bitbake.conf |6 -- conf/distro/include/angstrom.inc

Re: [oe] How to extend SRC_URI_append?

2010-09-03 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Is there really a case for a ${TARGET_ARCH}_${SOC_FAMILY} override. If these devices have different architectures are they really part of the same family? yes I've as I've the same soc family on 2 arch with 2 patch series I'm preparing it and will send soon I hope Best Regards J.

Re: [oe] gcc-cross-initial-4.3.3-r14.1 failed on SH4 angstrom

2010-08-10 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 11:27 Tue 10 Aug , Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote: HI,        I'm currently trying to use OE for a titan (SH4) board with Angstrom distrib        I've attached my conf and log        gcc-cross