On 02/22/2013 11:26 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 03:19:45PM +0100, Tasslehoff Kjappfot wrote:
Is the meta-qt5 layer at https://github.com/meta-qt5 a work in progress,
or should it be usable in its current state?
Not really, but I plan to work on it next week(s).
I
Is the meta-qt5 layer at https://github.com/meta-qt5 a work in progress,
or should it be usable in its current state?
I currently use qt4-embedded and compile and sdk with qt-support, and
want to try out qt5. Compiling qtbase gave me some packages I can add to
my image, but when I tried to create
On 05/14/2012 11:24 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Tasslehoff Kjappfot
tasskj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I have made a rootfs and an SDK with OE-classic. We use the SDK to
compile our own application, which links dynamically with some open
source libraries.
I have listed
Hi.
I have made a rootfs and an SDK with OE-classic. We use the SDK to
compile our own application, which links dynamically with some open
source libraries.
I have listed the LGPL libraries our application uses and linked to
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.txt, but I don't know how/if to
Signed-off-by: Tasslehoff Kjappfot tasskj...@gmail.com
---
meta-oe/recipes-support/synergy/synergy_1.3.8.bb |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/synergy/synergy_1.3.8.bb
b/meta-oe/recipes-support/synergy/synergy_1.3.8.bb
index
The reason my mails came to you from the future is that Ubuntu 12.04 is
messing with my date time. I am, was and will be sorry for the
inconvenience.
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
On 04/30/2012 12:33 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Tasslehoff Kjappfot
tasskj...@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tasslehoff Kjappfottasskj...@gmail.com
---
meta-oe/recipes-support/synergy/synergy_1.3.8.bb | 22 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions
Signed-off-by: Tasslehoff Kjappfot tasskj...@gmail.com
---
meta-oe/recipes-support/synergy/synergy_1.3.8.bb | 22 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-support/synergy/synergy_1.3.8.bb
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/synergy
---
meta-oe/recipes-support/synergy/synergy_1.3.8.bb | 22 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-support/synergy/synergy_1.3.8.bb
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/synergy/synergy_1.3.8.bb
Signed-off-by: Tasslehoff Kjappfot tasskj...@gmail.com
---
meta-oe/recipes-support/synergy/synergy_1.3.8.bb | 22 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-support/synergy/synergy_1.3.8.bb
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/synergy
Signed-off-by: Tasslehoff Kjappfot tasskj...@gmail.com
---
meta-oe/recipes-support/synergy/synergy_1.3.8.bb | 22 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-support/synergy/synergy_1.3.8.bb
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/synergy
My .bashrc contained export GREP_OPTIONS='--color=always', and that caused
the path in my pseudodone file to be prefixed by ^[[m^[[K. Override by
calling grep with --color=never.
---
scripts/bitbake |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/bitbake
Signed-off-by: Tasslehoff Kjappfot tasskj...@gmail.com
---
recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.39.bb |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.39.bb
b/recipes/linux/linux-omap_2.6.39.bb
index 8370e58..3880aa1 100644
--- a/recipes/linux/linux
From: Tasslehoff Kjappfot tasskj...@gmail.com
Running on a board similar to Beagleboard C3 (but without NAND) I could not
resume from suspend with the patch.
The console output when suspending was as expected, but neither console input
nor a timer would wake the board.
Without the patch
I run Angstrom 2010.8 with a 2.6.39 kernel. To get better power
management I want to use the 2.6.39 pm-branch from sakoman.
I've created a recipe called linux-sakoman-pm_2.6.39.bb and tried
setting some preferred providers.
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel_beagleboard = linux-sakoman-pm
I run Angstrom 2010.8 with a 2.6.39 kernel. To get better power management I
want to use the 2.6.39 pm-branch from sakoman.
What makes you think that has better PM? If you look at the actual patchsets,
you'll see that sakoman-pm is actually the angstrom .39 kernel :)
My board doesn't wake
On 10/13/2010 01:02 PM, Tasslehoff Kjappfot wrote:
I'm compiling myrootfs for the beagleboard, and have IMAGE_INSTALL +=
libusb1 in my recipe. This has worked fine until a recent update,
but now it fails with the following:
NOTE: Handling BitBake files: | (7156/7156) [100 %]
Parsing of 7156
On 10/13/2010 12:36 PM, Tasslehoff Kjappfot wrote:
On 10/13/2010 11:25 AM,
openembedded-devel-requ...@lists.openembedded.org wrote:
I'm trying to compile log4cxx, but it fails compiling apr-util,
saying
that it is looking at host includes.
I suspect the following from log.do_configure
I've compiled an SDK from a source tree in
//data/src/lead-dev/openembedded/, and the resulting gcc compiler for
arm has an RPATH of
//data/src/lead-dev/openembedded/build/angstrom-dev/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/lib/,
and will only run on my machine as long as that directory exists. If I
remove
This is apparently because it wants a native version of libmpfr.so.4,
which is not available for Ubuntu 10.04. OE compiled a version of the
library in the TMPDIR where I created the SDK, but of course that is not
distributed with the SDK.
I tried grabbing libmpfr.so.4 from Ubuntu 10.10, but
( http://www.pyside.org/), Nokias own Python bindings
for Qt? Is that something it would be interesting to have a recipe for?
I've been trying to make one myself, but my OE skills haven't proven
good enough.
On 05/05/2010 09:17 AM, Tasslehoff Kjappfot wrote:
I was told on #oe that I should have
I was told on #oe that I should have been a bit more verbose in my
previous mail, and I agree :-)
I'm compiling Angstrom for the Beagleboard with the latest
org.openembedded.dev, and python-pyqt fails. I took a closer look at the
recipes for python-pyqt and python-sip, and they use old
My compile fails with this output:
http://pastebin.org/201169
- Tasslehoff
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Like the topic says I'm trying to create an SDK to let people develop
for a BeagleBoard running Angstrom. I have followed the instructions in
the manual on creating an SDK, and have a basic one compiled.
I included linux-libc-headers, but found out that it gives me only the
vanilla
Like the topic says I'm trying to create an SDK to let people develop
for a BeagleBoard running Angstrom. I have followed the instructions in
the manual on creating an SDK, and have a basic one compiled.
I included linux-libc-headers, but found out that it gives me only the
vanilla
25 matches
Mail list logo
