Hi All,
OpenERP Medical project is now migrated to Tryton :( It's really
regretful. I think the main reason is related to license recently.
So far there's no information or conclusion about this issue.
Fabien, could you please tell something about the future of OpenERP.
--
On 15-09-11 19:02, Cuong Hoang Bui wrote:
Hi All,
OpenERP Medical project is now migrated to Tryton :( It's really
regretful. I think the main reason is related to license recently.
Hi,
the reasons cited for Medical supporting Tryton were:
1 support multiple frameworks for better
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Stefan Rijnhart ste...@therp.nl wrote:
On 15-09-11 19:02, Cuong Hoang Bui wrote:
Hi All,
OpenERP Medical project is now migrated to Tryton :( It's really
regretful. I think the main reason is related to license recently.
Hi,
the reasons cited for
Le 15/09/2011 19:02, Cuong Hoang Bui a écrit :
Hi All,
OpenERP Medical project is now migrated to Tryton :( It's really
regretful. I think the main reason is related to license recently.
AFAIK, the decision to migrate from openerp to tryton was made by
medical project before any discusion
A Divendres, 29 de juliol de 2011 17:38:53, Fabien Pinckaers va escriure:
Albert,
I was not talking about nan in my email. I have a lot of respect for nan
which is a very good company and that share a good open source vision.
So, guys, don't be confused by what's being said; some
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Albert Cervera i Areny
alb...@nan-tic.comwrote:
**
A Divendres, 29 de juliol de 2011 17:38:53, Fabien Pinckaers va escriure:
Albert,
I was not talking about nan in my email. I have a lot of respect for nan
which is a very good company and that share
.
From: Albert Cervera i Areny alb...@nan-tic.com
To: openerp-community@lists.launchpad.net
Cc: Fabien Pinckaers f...@openerp.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2011 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Openerp-community] Towards a contributor agreement for OpenERP
A Divendres, 29 de juliol de 2011 17
Hello community,
I'm unfortunately very busy right now, so here at Akretion we need to
discuss internally about that and give our position and suggestions.
Already I can tell that I'm very happy to see Fabien making such a proposal
to add some extra SaaS protective clause in license exception.
Albert,
I was not talking about nan in my email. I have a lot of respect for nan
which is a very good company and that share a good open source vision.
So, guys, don't be confused by what's being said; some activists are
motivated by something else than creating a strong product and community
Fabien,
sorry, to comment again:
Yes, may be I should explain this mistake of mine.
When I announced this, we found a solution that:
- is compatible with AGPL
Sorry, but I think you are playing on words here: private modules are not
compatibles with many strict AGPL modules we have in
Il 28/07/2011 01:59, Ana Juaristi ha scritto:
It's really a pity that Nan is moving to Triton and several others are
thinking about it. I think OpenERP doesn't know the value is loosing if
they let Nan go. It's my opinion.
Exactly, i don't care about the stupid war between tryton and openerp,
Hello,
It's a pity that some lost their trust on OpenERP, especially because these
fears and doubts have been highly motivated by tryton guys that tried to create
frustrations, unfair critics and war against OpenERP. We used to never answer
to these unfair attacks as creating a war and
Leonardo,
- on one side, some people, especially tryton supporters, are
behaving in a way I don't agree with. We all make our choices,
any of us is free work on OpenERP, Tryton, SAP, OpenBravo, a
bakery shop or whatever, but that doesn't entitle us to tweet
#openerp #fail and similar FUD as
Hello Fabien,
Well, now that you have personally mentioned my name, I am required to clarify
our (me and Openlabs) stand on your remarks.
On Jul 28, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Fabien Pinckaers wrote:
Hello,
It's a pity that some lost their trust on OpenERP, especially because these
fears and
Dear Stefan, thank you bringing up this topic. Thank you Fabian for
answering the questions raised.
The main question for me is still not asked and answered. Despite all
communication done already from the start of the announcement in this
dual license issue. To start with a side issue, where
A Dimecres, 27 de juliol de 2011 17:58:04, Raphael Valyi va escriure:
Okay, believe me the situation is just as annoying for us too. So I hope
you will start providing enough contractual guarantees about the SaaS and
may be make the exception only an additional option that is not something
Raphaël named the enterprises in Spain that built spanish localization
modules. They were Nan, Zikzakmedia, Pexego and so many people not only
partners but also community people who contributed and they are still
contributing. Thanks to them it's possible today installing and implementing
OpenERP
On 26-07-11 09:31, Alan Lord (Gmail) wrote:
Might be an idea to take a look at the output of Project Harmony[1]
for contributor agreements.
These are community (inc. Canonical) developed agreements with a
number of options to suit most requirements:
[1] http://harmonyagreements.org/
Al
Hello Stefan,
Thank you for your feedback.
thank you for your passionate reaction. I believe that you share the same
passion for Open Source software and the OpenERP products in particular as we
do.
Yes, and I take this opportunity to also thank you for the great contrib you
did too.
Hi,
In the forum topic on dual license community modules [1] we, like others
before us pointed out that OpenERP SA was not entitled to relicense code
from outside contributors. We were contacted afterwards by Olivier Dony
who asked us whether we would be willing to assign copyright of our
Hello,
We just follow the recommandation of the Free Software Foundation:
- http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AssignCopyright
Most of the good open source software publishers does this. As an
example, here is the one of Canonical (Ubuntu):
-
21 matches
Mail list logo
