Review: Needs Fixing code review, no tests
If people are willing to maintain this, then I'm not opposed to merging in
server-env-tools.
2 points, though, to gain my approval:
* the various size constraints seem overzealous to me (esp. server URL and
domain which are obviously too short for
Review: Abstain
Hello,
I would say we could give a chance for people interested to support it until
something better is made. Like many, I will probably not invest on it, if I
invest on that I would invest on something different indeed. But if it does the
job for some people...
It isn't a lot
Hi,
I'm then also in favor of keeping this module if 2 entities are together to
maintain it. Just for those who may miss that :
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openobject-addons/elico-7.0
ElicoCorp has made a synchronization tools based on the generic connector we
built as a
Review: Needs Information
Hi,
First of all, thank you a lot for all this work, my further comment doesn't
criticize any of your investment in here.
As this module has been abandoned by OpenERP, I'm not sure it's good to have it
in our community modules. For what I know about this module he
Oops, meant to mention the insertion of the cr.commit() after each object is
synced within the main synchronise method of the wizard. I don't really know
any other way of doing it. The RPCProxy commits on each record. Provided one
record commits correctly it is highly unlikely future records
5 matches
Mail list logo
