On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 11:21 +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
+ if (regulator_is_enabled(vcc)) {
+ dev_dbg(pdev-dev, Regulator already enabled\n);
+ rfkill_data-reg_enabled = 1;
+ }
+ rfkill_init_sw_state(rf_kill, !rfkill_data-reg_enabled);
+
+ ret =
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 16:06 +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
+ if (regulator_is_enabled(vcc)) {
+ dev_dbg(pdev-dev, Regulator already enabled\n);
+ rfkill_data-reg_enabled = 1;
+ }
+ rfkill_init_sw_state(rf_kill, !rfkill_data-reg_enabled);
+
+ ret =
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 23:11 +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:21:19AM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
+ tristate Generic rfkill regulator driver
+ depends on RFKILL || !RFKILL
That looks *odd*.
That's normal for rfkill -- if RFKILL==n then this can be anything since
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 16:29 +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 23:11:33 +0900
Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:21:19AM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
+ tristate Generic rfkill regulator driver
+ depends on RFKILL || !RFKILL
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 20:12 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 16:21 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 23:11 +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:21:19AM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
+ tristate Generic rfkill regulator driver
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:10 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:38 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
The syntax may seem strange,
It does!
but basically it just says don't let me by y if RFKILL is m
... but, besides that, I can be any value. So in effect it's shorthand
for
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:10 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:38 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
The syntax may seem strange,
It does!
but basically it just says don't let me by y if RFKILL is m
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:17 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:10 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:38 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
The syntax may seem strange,
It does
-by: Guiming Zhuo gmz...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite osp...@studenti.unina.it
---
Changes since v1:
- changed voltage regulator to voltage regulators in the commit
message
- drop rfkill_init_sw_state() as requested by Johannes Berg
- moved assignment fields of rfkill_data
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 13:41 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
+ * static struct regulator_consumer_supply pcap_regulator_V6_consumers []
= {
+ * { .dev_name = rfkill-regulator.0, supply = vrfkill },
+ * };
It's a comment, but it should be .supply = (missing the .)
+ if (pdata
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 08:15 -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:44:02PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 13:41 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
+ if (pdata-name == NULL || pdata-type == 0) {
+ dev_err(pdev-dev, invalid name or type
11 matches
Mail list logo
