Re: [OpenFontLibrary] WordPress fonts, bundling vs. linking

2013-11-16 Thread nooalf
To: Open Font Library openfontlibrary@lists.freedesktop.org Sent: Sat, Nov 16, 2013 7:17 pm Subject: Re: [OpenFontLibrary] WordPress fonts, bundling vs. linking Thanks Dave for pitching in. Vernon, indeed that font is for the WordPress UI that is being modernized. Regarding filesize: a default

Re: [OpenFontLibrary] WordPress fonts, bundling vs. linking

2013-11-13 Thread Manuel Schmalstieg
Thanks Dave for pitching in. Vernon, indeed that font is for the WordPress UI that is being modernized. Regarding filesize: a default WordPress install is pretty small, about 6.5 mb (compressed). If you include a font with a wide character set, x 4 weights, x 4 formats (WOFF, SVG, TTF, EOT),

Re: [OpenFontLibrary] WordPress fonts, bundling vs. linking

2013-11-13 Thread vernon adams
If it’s totally essential and function well, then i would say the extra % is just a fact-of-life. But i would think that bundling a full pan-international font into what is essentially a web-based framework, plus adding and configuring all the extra to make that font function well across

Re: [OpenFontLibrary] WordPress fonts, bundling vs. linking

2013-11-11 Thread Dave Crossland
Thanks! I'll pitch in

Re: [OpenFontLibrary] WordPress fonts, bundling vs. linking

2013-11-11 Thread Vernon Adams
I’m not sure i understand the reason for bundling in a font like that? Is it to be used for the wordpress UI etc? If so then i can’t see the big deal in fussing over the extra kb’s. Isn’t a default Wordpress install big enough that the extra footprint of a single font family a non-issue? -v