Sounds good...easiest solution, make new fonts released into PD or with
OFL license ;)
Jon
Personally I think it it would be useful to have a series of License choices
available for fonts - like CC has for other artistic works.
Just like other creative people there are type designers
Dear all,
Thanks a lot for this interesting thread!
Thomas Phinney, product Manager Fonts @ Adobe left this comment on our
blogpost on the possible re-licensing of Utopia:
Well, gosh, just drop me an email and we can talk. :)
I’m open to the possibility of using OFL on the four basic faces
2008/5/21 Femke Snelting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thomas Phinney, product Manager Fonts @ Adobe left this comment on our
blogpost on the possible re-licensing of Utopia:
I'm open to the possibility of using OFL on the four basic faces
of Utopia, as long as The Lawyers are okay with it.
2008/5/20 Jon Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* then, group outlined in the license adobe provides, TEX user group,
would need to make another license, preferably OFL which respects
adobe's first license
IANAL but AIUI sublicense is a legal term that means license to
someone else under these
Can someone introduce me to him as well? I just arrived back in SF and
have a meeting at Adobe on 30th and live 1.5 blocks from their office...
Jon
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 19:06 -0500, Karl Berry wrote:
Thomas Phinney, product Manager Fonts @ Adobe left this comment on our
blogpost on the
George Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 13:02, Christopher Fynn wrote:
In the case of Type 1 Fonts like Adobe Utopia what additional information
(not in the Type 1 Font file metrics file) would a Fontographer source
file provide anyway?
Well, kerning and ligatures live in the afm. But
On 20 мая 2008, Jon Phillips wrote:
* the font would need to be renamed, or if same name kept, or similar
name, authorization needed by Adobe
What do you mean as similar name? Adobe prohibited the use of Utopia
or Adobe.
--
Andrey V. Panov
panov /@/ canopus.iacp.dvo.ru
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 16:13 +1100, Andrey V. Panov wrote:
On 20 мая 2008, Jon Phillips wrote:
* the font would need to be renamed, or if same name kept, or similar
name, authorization needed by Adobe
What do you mean as similar name? Adobe prohibited the use of Utopia
or Adobe.
Using
Hats off to you on the work on this first!
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 18:22 -0500, Karl Berry wrote:
* the font would need to be modified (reasonably)
Well, that's the only time the whole question comes up.
* the font would need to be renamed, or if same name kept, or similar
name,
As far as I can understand the Adobe Utopia font
(http://tug.org/fonts/utopia ) could be modified and used for
designing, for example, OFL font. Could anybody clarify me the terms
of this license?
Well, I'm the one who pushed Adobe into updating the license to make the
Cool project for someone to take on modd'ing this thing and re-licensing
it :) My reading of the license is that any derivative:
* the font would need to be modified (reasonably)
* the font would need to be renamed, or if same name kept, or similar
name, authorization needed by Adobe
* then,
As far as I can understand the Adobe Utopia font (http://tug.org/fonts/utopia )
could be modified and used for designing, for example, OFL font. Could anybody
clarify me the terms of this license?
--
Andrey V. Panov
http://canopus.iacp.dvo.ru/~panov/
12 matches
Mail list logo
