Dave Crossland wrote:
On 11/05/07, Jon Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 19:14 -0100, Gustavo Ferreira wrote:
http://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/
I'm cc'ing Andy Fitzsimon and Jack Aboutboul to see who to connect with
at RedHat for trying to get them dual-licensed at
I wonder who the best person at Redhat is to contact about asking for
an OFL release? :-)
I speculate that these fonts, like so many others, were based on the URW
fonts, which are released under GPL+exception. In that case,
legally relicensing would be rather problematic.
k
Hi Nicolas and all,
ns Not quite sure how to interpret precisely the second exception...
ns IMHO this could use a README and a FAQ.
I agree.
dc I'd say that the OFL was more restrictive than the GPL.
nsIn what way?
You yourself stated later in your msg that the OFL has
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 03:12 +0100, Dave Crossland wrote:
On 10/05/07, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 19:14 -0100, Gustavo Ferreira wrote:
http://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/
I wonder who the best person at Redhat is to contact about asking for
an OFL
