From: Dave Crossland:
The problem is, I don't want to be a pariah in the type community anymore
than I have to be.
Regards, Dave
Beyond pariah status, as you are in the U.K., involvment in such a project
could subject you to civil or criminal liabilities.
On 14 May 2009, 12:28 AM, Khaled
Hi,
The problem is, I don't want to be a pariah in the type community anymore
than I have to be.
Regards, Dave
On 14 May 2009, 12:28 AM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:06:58PM -0400, Jon Stanley wrote: On Wed, May
13, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Dave...
If it is
Fair enough :)
(I wouldn't, consciously, upset them myself either)
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 08:03:31AM +0100, Dave Crossland wrote:
Hi,
The problem is, I don't want to be a pariah in the type community anymore than
I have to be.
Regards, Dave
On 14 May 2009, 12:28 AM, Khaled Hosny
Indeed, for legitimate revivals of old
printed typefaces that are in public domain
Remember, ALL printed typefaces are in the Public Domain, irregardless
of
the copyright status of the fonts they were created from. (In the United
States. Other countries laws differ considerably.)
So
Hi,
That would be bad.
Regards, Dave
On 13 May 2009, 6:05 PM, fontfree...@aol.com wrote:
Indeed, for legitimate revivals of old
printed typefaces that are in public domain
Remember, ALL printed typefaces are in the Public Domain, irregardless of
the copyright status of the fonts they were
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:06:58PM -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Dave Crossland d...@lab6.com wrote:
That would be bad.
I think bad qualifies as the understatement of the century. More
like horrible, horrendous, awful, abominable, atrocious, crummy.
Point
