2008/11/1 Christopher Fynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 11:33 +, Dave Crossland wrote:
http://typeface.neocracy.org/
I think it would be great for OFLB to support this once day, as a
'fallback' for browsers without @font-face linking support :-)
What we need is proper
Dave Crossland wrote:
Do you think _not_ supporting things like that .js will help speed
@font-face adoption?
As much as possible, I'd like to see efforts *focused* on getting
widespread support for @font-face.
As I see it partial solutions can remove some of the pressure for a more
I agree with Chris 100%.
When I took a look at the http://typeface.neocracy.org/ project and code, I
was surprised at all the work they had put in to it. One problem with this
approach is that it is so temporary -- as soon as @font-face becomes more
widely supported, their solution will be
Hi,
Ed Trager wrote:
bigger problem, as Chris pointed out, is there is no support for complex
text layout. So they have all of this nicely written code with complete
workarounds for both CANVAS and VML, and perhaps one year from now it will
remain largely unused.
Can't wait for that
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 11:33 +, Dave Crossland wrote:
http://typeface.neocracy.org/
I think it would be great for OFLB to support this once day, as a
'fallback' for browsers without @font-face linking support :-)
Even better would be to see @font-face supported more widely :D
Liam
--
2008/10/31 Liam R E Quin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 11:33 +, Dave Crossland wrote:
http://typeface.neocracy.org/
I think it would be great for OFLB to support this once day, as a
'fallback' for browsers without @font-face linking support :-)
Even better would be to see
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 08:28:00PM +, Dave Crossland wrote:
2008/10/31 Liam R E Quin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 11:33 +, Dave Crossland wrote:
http://typeface.neocracy.org/
I think it would be great for OFLB to support this once day, as a
'fallback' for browsers
