Tel/fax (home): +27-21-685-6472; Cell: +27-82-853-5352
*
- Original Message -
From: David Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: Australian OpenEHR implementation, was Re: Typed untyped
Horst Herb wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:37, Thomas Beale wrote:
Thomas,
Is this going to be Free/Open Source software?
it's government funded, so it should be!
It should, of course. But so far I am not aware of any government funded
health software projects that resulted in open
Andrew Ho wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Tim Churches wrote:
...
Horst Herb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:11, Tim Churches wrote:
Thomas, Horst and Tim,
So, just to clarify.
I gather that none you know of any specific plan to publish the
Australian
Perhaps I'll add my nickle's worth here. I have personally come to
believe that an Open Source project is characterized by an openness to
collaborate with others. If one is to work on an OS project alone then
gives it away for free - that makes the person a Santa Claus! I have in
fact learned that
To add to David's and Wayne's perspectives and borrowing a quote from
another colleague with a slight edit from me:
the perfect is often the enemy of the good [enough]
Joseph
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 06:02, David Chan wrote:
Perhaps I'll add my nickle's worth here. I have personally come to
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 23:11, Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
To add to David's and Wayne's perspectives and borrowing a quote from
another colleague with a slight edit from me:
the perfect is often the enemy of the good [enough]
Apparent there is some debate whether it was von Clausewitz or Voltaire
On Friday 23 April 2004 02:38, Horst Herb wrote:
It should, of course. But so far I am not aware of any government funded
health software projects that resulted in open source code - ever.
VistA?
--
Adrian Midgley (Linux desktop)
GP, Exeter
http://www.defoam.net/
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 20:02, David Chan wrote:
Perhaps I'll add my nickle's worth here. I have personally come to
believe that an Open Source project is characterized by an openness to
collaborate with others. If one is to work on an OS project alone then
gives it away for free - that makes
Horst Herb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:11, Tim Churches wrote:
It should, of course. But so far I am not aware of any government
funded
health software projects that resulted in open source code -
ever.
How about VistA? And then there are all the health
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Tim Churches wrote:
...
Horst Herb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:11, Tim Churches wrote:
Thomas, Horst and Tim,
So, just to clarify.
I gather that none you know of any specific plan to publish the
Australian implementation of OpenEHR under an open
Andrew Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Tim Churches wrote:
...
Horst Herb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:11, Tim Churches wrote:
Thomas, Horst and Tim,
So, just to clarify.
I gather that none you know of any specific plan to publish the
11 matches
Mail list logo
