Hi Tim, Dr. Ho,
the discussion is very interesting.
My personal opinion:
a human user has intelligence.
an application has a program.
regards,
elpidio
On Sunday 14 March 2004 17:15, Andrew Ho wrote:
What's the difference between an application talking to OIO vs. a
human user? :-)
some threads related around the MIT effort:
MIT created the OKI project, which is intended to create a set of
API's for the technology behind the open course ware project. This
was to lead to two reference implementations of learning managment
software.
Meanwhile, at the University of
On Sat, 14 Mar 2004, Tim Churches wrote:
On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 04:51, Andrew Ho wrote:
To render an OIO form for data collection -
http://ip_address_to_server/OIO/forms/fillout_form?skin=pink_interfacept=4973form=Prognotes_v0
Two quick questions:
Does this always create a new form
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Elpidio Latorilla wrote:
...
But my original query was based on my wish to have a
behind-the-scene-app-to-app dialog.
Elpidio,
What's the difference between an application talking to OIO vs. a human
user? :-)
...
If I create an interface that wants to get a set of
Hi Dr. Ho,
thanks a lot for the explanations. I will try to see what resources are needed
to implement an interface.
Best regards,
elpidio
On Sunday 14 March 2004 11:18, Andrew Ho wrote:
Elpidio,
What's the difference between an application talking to OIO vs. a human
user? :-)
I hope
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 06:18, Andrew Ho wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Elpidio Latorilla wrote:
...
But my original query was based on my wish to have a
behind-the-scene-app-to-app dialog.
Elpidio,
What's the difference between an application talking to OIO vs. a human
user? :-)
On Sun, 15 Mar 2004, Tim Churches wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 06:18, Andrew Ho wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Elpidio Latorilla wrote:
...
But my original query was based on my wish to have a
behind-the-scene-app-to-app dialog.
Elpidio,
What's the difference between an
Andrew Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2004, Tim Churches wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 06:18, Andrew Ho wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Elpidio Latorilla wrote:
...
But my original query was based on my wish to have a
behind-the-scene-app-to-app dialog.
Elpidio,
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 00:19, J. Antas wrote:
How is that for a start? Does it seem pragmatic enough?
No.
You mentioned the Norwegian system as one that works well.
It does indeed.
On e of the reasons is that even first yea children can remember their ID
number, no need to write it down - it is
Adrian Midgley wrote:
You might like to look at this
http://aninfosys.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl
This is another is what I would call a grass roots movement to better
clinical information systems.
I wonder if you could provide an updated assessement on how the grass
roots movements and FLOSS
On Tuesday 09 March 2004 15:40, Wayne Wilson wrote:
I wonder if you could provide an updated assessement on how the grass
roots movements and FLOSS are faring under the new NHS spending programme.
Not flavour of the month.
OTOH, all projects except the national one (NPfIT) have essentially
http://www.linuxrouter.org/
Steven B. Tomlinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pacific Telehealth and Technology Hui
www.PacificHui.org
Tomlinson, Steven B.vcf
Tomlinson, Steven B.vcf
Description: Binary data
What I find interesting about the LRP experience is that many, if not most,
of the SOHO Firewall/Router devices out there are based on this guy's code.
It's ironic that millions of these devices have been sold, but the developer
who not dreamed it up but was actually able to create the code, has
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no mechanism to get paid for his brilliant Intellectual Property which he
neglected to protect, because he released his product as Open Source. The
Nonsense.
1.) Intellectual property is a dehumanizing construct which I put into the
same
http://openpms.sourceforge.net/
It's got several overlappings:
billing
FreeB
TkFP
practice management
TORCH
FreeMED
GnuMed
TkFP
Java:
Res Medicinae (?)
And countless others I forgot.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.linuxrouter.org/
Steven,
It is far too simplistic to attribute the demise of LRP to the open
source community.
If anyone is interested in an autopsy, the Slashdot discussion back in
June 2003 is a must-read:
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
guy's code. It's ironic that millions of these devices have been sold,
but the developer has to give up the development of software because he
doesn't make any money at it.
Steven,
Dave Cinege did not have to give up the development.
He made
The whole thing proves to me the utter folly of giving away your I.P., if
you have the skill and ability to write useful code.
He should never had released the code which he developed from the sweat of
his brow.
Those in a position to do so have now profited from his hard work and he has
nothing
Our fundamental viewpoints are so disparate that we could not even begin to
engage in a meaningful discourse regarding this issue.
Steven B. Tomlinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pacific Telehealth and Technology Hui
www.PacificHui.org
-Original Message-
From: Horst Herb [mailto:[EMAIL
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Horst Herb wrote:
...
1.) Intellectual property is a dehumanizing construct
Horst,
Dehumanizing or not, intellectual property happens to be an important
artifact for much of the Westernized societies.
...
There is no evolution of knowledge if knowledge is not shared
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Tomlinson, Steven B wrote:
The whole thing proves to me the utter folly of giving away your I.P.,
Steven,
Even if the only goal in life is to die with the most gold pieces under
one's name, I would still disagree with your statement.
Folly? Even Microsoft gives away IP
Does anyone know the name of the IDX Microsoft entangled software of which
you speak?
Both IDX and iSoft deliver Microsoft based (entangled would be a
better word) client/server records systems and CMWHealth as part of
the National Spine program will integrate local records into a
Elpidio Latorilla wrote:
About the PID concept, also named MPI, the following was taken from
the openhealth list:
State of the art may be in the eye of the beholder, but we have a
component out of which an MPI can be built. It is an implementation of
the Person Identification Service (PIDS)
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 08:09, Tim Churches wrote:
Hmmm, that means moving the date parsing into Javascript
as well.
Here is a good place to start (try the demo):
http://simon.incutio.com/archive/2003/10/06/betterDateInput
Shouldn't be too hard to add Adrian's idea of date manipulation commands
You might like to look at this
http://aninfosys.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl
--
Adrian Midgley (Linux desktop)
GP, Exeter
http://www.defoam.net/
I would like to draw your attention to the report:
RECOMMENDATION ON THE OPENNESS OF THE CODE AND
INTERFACES OF STATE INFORMATION SYSTEMS
It is short, pragmatic and was published by the Ministry of Finance,
Finland.
Taken from it:
1. About FLOSS(*) developers (in page 14):
Their age is
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 05:02, Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
~ natural selection can often be uncomfortable and in some cases
extremely painful (when you don't survive)... but for it to be more
intelligent you need open critical peer review
Ok..the openEHR documents are available for review.
J. Antas wrote:
... I must confess, I had a hard time trying
to create a user model of it... and I gave up.
Either it is because I am not a native english speaker and I cannot
fully understand some of the concepts beneath it, or it is because my
own neural network was not able to catch it.
I
Wayne Wilson wrote:
J. Antas wrote:
... I must confess, I had a hard time trying to create a user model
of it... and I gave up.
Either it is because I am not a native english speaker and I cannot
fully understand some of the concepts beneath it, or it is because my
own neural network was not
I'm finding it hard to pick through the data models.
What I'm looking for are small areas where it is sensible to steal the
archetypes as the basic design, but which are small enough that the extra
initial work of doing it so formally is not a big burden.
Possibly a video or animation with
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 03:04, Thomas Beale wrote:
I have to admit that it is only now that we have begun to write primers
of various kinds to help understanding - they will start to appear on
the web. But in the end, nothing substitutes for presentations and
interactive communication...
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Thomas Beale wrote:
...
There are implementations going ahead in Australia, UK, US, Germany, and
under consideration in Netherlands. But a large part of the work is
designing the archetypes and templates for it.
Thomas,
What is the current situation with regards to
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Wayne Wilson wrote:
...
I had a similar situation a few years ago when the OMG Health SIG was
working on what became the COAS interface. I could not understand the
GEHR model that was being presented.
...
I really do believe that this kind of thinking is only able to be
Andrew Ho wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Thomas Beale wrote:
...
There are implementations going ahead in Australia, UK, US, Germany, and
under consideration in Netherlands. But a large part of the work is
designing the archetypes and templates for it.
Thomas,
What is the current situation
Tim Churches wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 03:04, Thomas Beale wrote:
I have to admit that it is only now that we have begun to write primers
of various kinds to help understanding - they will start to appear on
the web. But in the end, nothing substitutes for presentations and
interactive
Thomas Beale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
published evaluations are hard to come by; there are several
incarnations of GEHR which had (and still have) commercial success;
evaluations of the work we did in Australia do have reports
associated
with them, which the commonwealth owns, and we are
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Thomas Beale wrote:
...
What is the current situation with regards to software that
support the creation and use of OpenEHR archetypes and templates?
I should point out that there is a difference between software that
companies and other organsiations create and
On 1 Mar 2004, at 16:07, Wayne Brandes wrote:
Mr Raymond's views in this essay are as shortsighted as those he's
accusing.
He complains that foss programmers have the hubris to assume that the
instructions they write are understandable to themselves and therefore
must be understandable to
Bruce Slater wrote:
Also on an unrelated topic can anyone explain why many posting to openhealth
arrive with the text only visible as an attachment? Is there a setting in
outlook express that would automatically open the attachment so I could read
it without excess clicks?
My guess is that my
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 09:09, Wayne Wilson wrote:
--
Wayne Wilson
An attachment containing my pgp-signature is included.
But now of course you must have an alternate sig line since your
pgp-signature is no longer included. ;-)
Cheers,
Tim
Wayne Brandes wrote:
But Mr Raymond is far from a non-techy by almost any definition. If
instructions were written to his level there would still be a vastly
greater pool of less experienced computer users who would still not be
able to understand them. Until foss software becomes usable by
Tim Cook wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 09:09, Wayne Wilson wrote:
--
Wayne Wilson
An attachment containing my pgp-signature is included.
But now of course you must have an alternate sig line since your
pgp-signature is no longer included. ;-)
Another thing the mailer must do eh?
Actually,
Hi Wayne,
Would like to add to your response the need for non-computer literate
Healthcare Providers,
Patients, Payers, Regulators and others who would benefit from
mechanisms to convey
information to computer-literate personnel that could in turn be
translated into meaningful,
precise,
Andrew's initial response to this (this is care2x's data model; why
should we favour it as a global data model over any other) is about
right. Care2x has built a single-level model to make their system work,
just like every other system builder - and that's fine. You can see that
it's
Thomas Beale wrote:
Others here and elsewhere of course have thought about the problem (for
many years) of making data models that really do work for all of the
domain,
Rationally I do agree with you. I am sure that they are better models.
But my problem in the first place was:
How are they
J. Antas wrote:
I did not included it because, I must confess, I had a hard time
trying to create a user model of it... and I gave up.
Either it is because I am not a native english speaker and I cannot
fully understand some of the concepts beneath it, or it is because my
own neural network
Horst Herb wrote:
Not a matter of believing. We know from available evidence that there are some
domains where private enterprise always delivers inferior outcome as compared
to *equally funded* public undertakings: research, education and health.
That is also my feeling, but up until now I was
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, denny adelman wrote:
...
I found myself wondering what alchemy would bring the open source
community into legitimate competition for such large projects.
Denny,
This is a great question that actually has already been answered. The
answer is contained in the history of
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 05:51, Andrew Ho wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, denny adelman wrote:
...
I found myself wondering what alchemy would bring the open source
community into legitimate competition for such large projects.
Denny,
This is a great question that actually has already been
On Mon, 24 Feb 2004, Tim Churches wrote:
...
matter of pure practicality - in order to undertake really complex
projects, you need a team of people who can immerse themselves in the
project,
...
Tim,
There is no debate that people are needed. However, how the team come
together and operate
Andrew Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Microsoft provides open-source software through Windows XP, for
example:
...
Does that mean that the answer is a null set, or that you forgot to list the open
source software which Microsoft provides through Windows XP?
Tim C
For some reason, it appears that a support.microsoft.com URL was
censored and did not reach Tim. Here it is again (repeated 3x):
1.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com:80/support/kb/articles/Q306/8/19.ASP
2.
Tim Churches wrote:
Ah hah! The URLs have been mysteriously moved to the bottom of your
message - see below.
I found this quite odd. I received both of Andrew's postings with the URL
links positioned as he had intended. Sometimes I am just fascinated that we
are not driven absolutely mad
Tim Churches [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason, it appears that a support.microsoft.com URL was
censored and did not reach Tim. Here it is again (repeated 3x):
1.
2.
3.
Ah hah! The URLs have been mysteriously moved to the
Andrew Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason, it appears that a support.microsoft.com URL was
censored and did not reach Tim. Here it is again (repeated 3x):
1.
2.
3.
Ah hah! The URLs have been mysteriously moved to the bottom of your
message - see below. I had a quick look
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Tim Churches wrote:
...
I had a quick look at the firt of thoose URLs and it is not immediately
apparent what its relevance is,
...
Can you give us some hints?
Tim,
The URL points to Microsoft's Windows XP copyright disclosure that
mentions inclusion of open-source
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Tim Churches wrote:
...
OK, I see what you are referring to now - the licenses for BSD material
from the Regents of the Uni of California etc at the end of the
document. But surely that is an example of Microsoft making use of other
party's open source code,
Tim,
What
Andrew Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Tim Churches wrote:
...
OK, I see what you are referring to now - the licenses for BSD
material
from the Regents of the Uni of California etc at the end of the
document. But surely that is an example of Microsoft making use of
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,8209-1009195,00.html
They have missed out Thailand, but I suppose that could at a stretch be
regarded as only an announced plan - to offer cheap Thai Windows rather than
an actual _offer_.
Commentary: In order to preserve the appearance of a
snip
Historical footnote: One of the ways Microsoft stuffed Word Perfect was by
producing a single version where WP Corp had to produce multiple ones
/snip
could you expand ? not sure I follow
Bruce
An interesting and potentially useful project (for health) in its own
right - initial version only runs under Linux, and it is built with
Apache, Python, Zope, Aspell - but also a wonderful example of a govt
agency using FLOSS not just to reduce their costs, but also to empower
their own
I peeked at this very quickly. Extremely nice work, here.
I get hammered a lot for having standardized, very low cost hourly
rates - people laugh, but as this paper points out, open source
services must above all be affordable to the developing economies.
That's the motivation behind an
On Fri, 21 Feb 2004, Tim Churches wrote:
On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 09:58, Andrew Ho wrote:
1) show OIO used for 3 different applications (clinical, research,
eCommerce)
What was the address of the OIO e-commerce site again? From memory it
sold little LED light thingies.
Tim,
It
On 2004.02.19 08:19 Ignacio Valdes wrote:
As I wrote on LMN: the usual smells of health-IT failure: mandate
from above what technology will be used, knee-jerk move towards
proprietary software and massive expenditure followed by abysmal
failure.
I can concieve of some solid business cases
On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 11:36, Andrew Ho wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2004, Tim Churches wrote:
On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 09:58, Andrew Ho wrote:
1) show OIO used for 3 different applications (clinical, research,
eCommerce)
What was the address of the OIO e-commerce site again? From
On Fri, 21 Feb 2004, Tim Churches wrote:
...
Thanks. Like the US Dept of Labor WorkForce Connections project, this is
a nice (meaning innocuous) example of how FLOSS work in one domain can
benefit entirely different domains of endeavour.
Tim,
For software generator R+D projects like OIO,
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the article. I am very much aware of the position of OSS in Sri Lanka, and
I feel that it is time to push the concept of FOSS as the e-government and e-Lanka
initiatives are to be implemented soon. The SL government has signed an MOU with
Microsoft Corporation and the
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 20:18, Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
Sri Lanka also has very lax laws relating to the use of software
and therefore has become a paradise for pirated software. One can
buy Windows XP and Office XP porfessional for less than US$ 2 and
use it! Under such a scenario OSS makes
On 18 Feb 2004, at 22:52, Horst Herb wrote:
The difference is that one attempts to work for the greater good (but
not
necessarily sacrifice itself in that process, even FOSS developers
have to
eat), while the other attempts to maximise profit for itself (and
solely for
itself) *regardless*
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:56, denny adelman wrote:
There are some people here (I am one) who believe in the life-style
model of self-employment (risk and adventure) and Commerce (I make it,
you want it, we reach a fair deal, thank you's all around, we stay in
Who said I disagree?
I *am*
That's the difference. Time is a limited resource, that costs -
knowledge is
unlimited, not countable, invaluable and hence no price tag attached.
Acquiring knowledge costs time, hence hiring my skills is expensive.
But once
I completed some work, and I have been paid for my time, I would
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 06:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When addressing the need for global organizations that will raise the
participation
and well-being of less-privileged global communities it might be more
efficient to
leave the 'for-profit' persons/organizations to their own activities
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 07:09, Smith, Todd wrote:
Natural Language processing is very hard to do
and without some breakthroughs in AI unlikely to produce the results
requested.
Yes indeed. It is now quite easy to get computers to intelligently
manipulate natural language, but we are still a
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 07:28, Andrew Ho wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Wayne Wilson wrote:
...
But if it is, then I suspect we can all be replaced by robots.
Wayne,
Since this is one of the most common response after I give an OIO
talk or demo, I have been giving this some thought.
Andrew,
Hi Wayne,
My interpretation of your concerns is that the world has multiple groups
of Clinicians
distributed throughout with differing Healthcare, culture and Patient
communities, plus
they may not all speak English or have a 'good' command of the language.
Language specialist have considered
The best approach is a NGO for a worldwide IS with appropriate
connections, donors
and legality, e.g., capable of establishing and maintaining
appropriate Intellectual Property
rights, a substitute to the for-profit products and services. Sure
beats jurisdictions where
legislation can be based
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 02:55, Wayne Wilson wrote:
Does open source provide a way for the western worlds programmers to
deal with IT oursourcing?
Of course it does. Outsourcing is a tool used almost exlusively by large
corporations. Large corporations cannot survive without foul tricks like
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the response. Comments in text.
-Thomas Clark
Tim Churches wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 05:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Churches wrote:
...and the US State Dept justification for the torpedoing of any mention
of the potential role of FOSS in addressing global
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 06:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A 'non-profit' person/organization will ask 'How can I be of
assistance?'; a 'for-profit'
person/organization will ask 'Can you pay for my time and effort?'
I believe you got this wrong.
Non-profit entity will ask 'How can I be of assistance?
Hi Molly,
Thanks for the post and 'http://www.iosn.net/'. I hope that the people
there can benefit
substantially from its activities. Microsoft's donation should help them
achieve some goals.
Regards!
-Thomas Clark
Dr Molly Cheah wrote:
The best approach is a NGO for a worldwide IS with
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 09:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Molly,
Thanks for the post and 'http://www.iosn.net/'. I hope that the people
there can benefit
substantially from its activities. Microsoft's donation should help them
achieve some goals.
By them you are presumably referring to
Hi All,
A note about simple economics.
A viable approach worldwide is to support people attempting to help
themselves. This
applies to Healthcare.
A recent documentary about Viet Nam showed that since the end of the war
in the delta
the government and farmers have developed their
Hi Horst,
Good point!
Regards!
-Thomas Clark
Horst Herb wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 06:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A 'non-profit' person/organization will ask 'How can I be of
assistance?'; a 'for-profit'
person/organization will ask 'Can you pay for my time and effort?'
I believe you
This report, commissioned by the Swedish govt development agency (and
referenced by the IOSN site) is useful:
http://www.sida.se/Sida/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=1250a=23955
Nothing startling, but a nice review of the background and an
examination of open source business models in poor countries, plus
This brief story - http://www.bradenton.com/mld/bradenton/7983667.htm -
recounts the apparent failure of a new $450m application at a VA Hospital.
It sounds like an Enterprise Resource Planning app. Do any of our
VA-affiliated members know how this fits with VistA/CPRS?
Gary Kantor
The
Can someone undertake to post a message with a REALLY OBVIOUS subject
when the list-decider group figures out what list we should end up
using, or else do some sort of automatic resubscribe? Like most people I
don't have the time to read all those posts about possible alternative
lists...there
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Thomas Beale wrote:
...
(not generally known as a sheep, but happy to be treated like one in
this instance...)
Let's move on and agree to be sheep then:
1) pick 3 people who will manage the list for us
2) agree that these 3 people will decide how/who should host the mailing
I, too, am another sheep heard from.
Andrew, can we reorder your list to #2, #3, #1 so that we may agree before
picking them? I must add that as sheep, all 3 items appear to be
unnecessary. Do they pick themselves?
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Friday 13 February 2004 14:44, Thomas Beale wrote:
Can someone undertake to post a message with a REALLY OBVIOUS subject
when the list-decider group figures out what list we should end up
using, or else do some sort of automatic resubscribe?
I undertake to do so.
If anyone wants to email
Quoting Michael D. Weisner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I, too, am another sheep heard from.
Andrew, can we reorder your list to #2, #3, #1 so that we may agree
before picking them?
Mike,
You are right.
It should be:
1) agree that 3 individuals will decide how/who should host the
mailing list
On Fri, 14 Feb 2004, Tim Churches wrote:
...
Joseph and I both like the utter simplicity of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That nicely includes the concepts of discussion, announcements of new
projects and releases, events etc
Any other reactions, suggestions?
Tim,
Integrating OSHCA with OpenHealth
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 17:22, Andrew Ho wrote:
Integrating OSHCA with OpenHealth is a wonderful idea that I fully
support, except for the quagmire that currently surrounds the transfer of
OSHCA.Org domain to OSHCA's current interim board.
The origins of the quagmire OSHCA is experiencing
On Sat, 2004-02-14 at 09:22, Andrew Ho wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2004, Tim Churches wrote:
...
Joseph and I both like the utter simplicity of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That nicely includes the concepts of discussion, announcements of new
projects and releases, events etc
Any other reactions,
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 15:19, Tim Churches wrote:
Herewith the current state of affairs, with apologies for cross-posting:
a) Some time ago (late 2002, early 2003?) a motion was put to the
Openhealth list that OSHCA should seek incorporation as a non-profit
organisation. The rationale was
Andrew Ho wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Wayne Wilson wrote:
...
However, the solution could also be put into another context you bring
up, that of a standardized framework in which inter-operable components
are developed (my paraphrase). IN that sense, the problem is that the
openhealth list is not
I'm also a lurker and a graduate student in IS. I monitor the list to
learn about IS needs and issues in the healthcare community. There are interesting
possibilities for dissertation topics here. I've found the list to be very
informative.
-Lorie
Lorie Obal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---Begin
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 05:04, Andrew Ho wrote:
Maybe that's why we disagree. Maybe you and Adrian want OpenHealth to be
a showcase to decision makers for how we all work nicely together -
and airing disagreements just aren't nice by your definition.
I also think that Openhealth, or
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Wayne Wilson wrote:
...
You have now alerted the list many times to my supposed desire to
hijack the list for my own ego purposes.
Wayne,
I am sorry that you interpreted my comments in that way. For the record,
I don't know whether Wayne Wilson intents to hijack
ditto,
Lorie Obal wrote:
I'm also a lurker and a graduate student in IS. I monitor the list to
learn about IS needs and issues in the healthcare community. There are interesting
possibilities for dissertation topics here. I've found the list to be very
informative.
-Lorie
Lorie Obal
[EMAIL
Tim,
This a great idea which was also the essence of a lively discussion that
Etienne Saliez's presentation sparked at the OSHCA meeting in Geneva. I
haven't received Etienne's excellent presentation yet...will email him
directly and remind him to send it to us so we can post it.
Will expand on
901 - 1000 of 3404 matches
Mail list logo
