On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 09:46 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote:
Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:15 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote:
I would like these fixes in OFED 1.2 as well. What git tree / branch
do I
generate a patch against?
- Sean
Please send patches that will be added to kernel_patches/fixes.
Please update your git tree from
git://git.openfabrics.org/~vlad/ofed_1_2/.git ofed_1_2
You want me to create a patch that adds a file that contains the actual patches?
Why not apply the patches directly?
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 08:45 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote:
Please send patches that will be added to kernel_patches/fixes.
Please update your git tree from
git://git.openfabrics.org/~vlad/ofed_1_2/.git ofed_1_2
You want me to create a patch that adds a file that contains the actual
patches?
Quoting Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
Please send patches that will be added to kernel_patches/fixes.
Please update your git tree from
git://git.openfabrics.org/~vlad/ofed_1_2/.git ofed_1_2
You want me to create a patch that adds a file that contains
Yes, actual patches should be created under kernel_patches/fixes.
Please update your git tree because the following patch fails:
Can you explain how the patch fails? I don't see how putting the patch into a
file helps.
Why not apply the patches directly?
To be consistent with 2.6.20 kernel.
Quoting Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
Yes, actual patches should be created under kernel_patches/fixes.
Please update your git tree because the following patch fails:
Can you explain how the patch fails? I don't see how putting the patch into a
file
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 18:55 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Quoting Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
Please send patches that will be added to kernel_patches/fixes.
Please update your git tree from
git://git.openfabrics.org/~vlad/ofed_1_2/.git
Quoting Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 18:55 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Quoting Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
Please send patches that will be added to kernel_patches
I think with stacked git or just git and rebasing at key times, you
could keep an ofed_1_2 tree that folks can easily apply patches to...
Its too late to change this for 1.2, but you might want to reconsider
the design for 1.3.
Can't we just create a new branch (ofed_1_2_patched) with these
:
Quoting Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 18:55 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Quoting Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
Please send patches that will be added to kernel_patches/fixes.
Please
Quoting Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
I think with stacked git or just git and rebasing at key times, you
could keep an ofed_1_2 tree that folks can easily apply patches to...
Its too late to change this for 1.2, but you might want to reconsider
the
development, they should be detailed on the wiki. The wiki is
where all permanent knowledge should be posted.
This is just my $0.01...
On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Quoting Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
This is just my $0.01...
Thanks for the suggestions, but what does $0.01 buy one in US today?
--
MST
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 19:44 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Quoting Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
I think with stacked git or just git and rebasing at key times, you
could keep an ofed_1_2 tree that folks can easily apply patches to...
Its too
On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Lot's of stuff *is* in wiki already - did you look at pages Vlad
created?
A search for quilt on the wiki turns up nothing (I checked before I
posted :-) ).
And yes, I have [thoroughly] read the pages Vlad created. But the
very
Quoting Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 19:44 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Quoting Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
I think with stacked git or just git and rebasing at key times, you
This is just my $0.01...
It buys very little, if anything. In fact, a whole $0.02 also buys
very little, if anything. So take my comments for what they're worth.
Oh, good, I thought deflation is getting out of hand ...
--
MST
___
Lot's of stuff *is* in wiki already - did you look at pages Vlad
created?
A search for quilt on the wiki turns up nothing (I checked before I
posted :-) ).
And yes, I have [thoroughly] read the pages Vlad created. But the
very fact that this conversation is occurring is because
Sean, please install quilt and try using it for working with the system.
Adding new patch is usually done in this way
quilt new patch
quilt add files
edit
quilt refresh
cp patches/patch kernel_patches/fixes/
git add kernel_patches/fixes/patch
git commit
But you cannot keep a stack for more than one backport pushed, right?
So you still need to be slapping the stacks of patches around for each
backport.
Why not have separate branches for each kernels too?
___
openib-general mailing list
Quoting Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
Sean, please install quilt and try using it for working with the system.
Adding new patch is usually done in this way
quilt new patch
quilt add files
edit
quilt refresh
cp
Quoting Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: RE: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
But you cannot keep a stack for more than one backport pushed, right?
So you still need to be slapping the stacks of patches around for each
backport.
Why not have separate branches for each kernels too?
I think
I think it'll be much more work to maintain all these branches.
And again, there will be conflicts, and it's too easy to get confused when
resolving a conflict.
Storing patches in a directory seems confusing to me. They must be applied in
a
specific order for everything to work, and that
On 19:44 Tue 27 Feb , Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Quoting Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
I think with stacked git or just git and rebasing at key times, you
could keep an ofed_1_2 tree that folks can easily apply patches to...
Its too late to
Quoting Sasha Khapyorsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
On 19:44 Tue 27 Feb , Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Quoting Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for OFED 1.2
I think with stacked git or just git and rebasing at key times, you
could
Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:15 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote:
I would like these fixes in OFED 1.2 as well. What git tree / branch
do I
generate a patch against?
- Sean
git://git.openfabrics.org/~vlad/ofed_1_2/.git
branch: ofed_1_2
Can you try pulling from:
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:15 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote:
I would like these fixes in OFED 1.2 as well. What git tree / branch do I
generate a patch against?
- Sean
git://git.openfabrics.org/~vlad/ofed_1_2/.git
branch: ofed_1_2
- Vladimir
---
rdma_cm: remove unused node_guid from
27 matches
Mail list logo
