Re: [openib-general] Re: [openib-commits] r1186 - gen2/trunk/src/linux-kernel/infiniband/core

2004-11-09 Thread Nitin Hande
Tom Duffy wrote: On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 15:23 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: halr Date: 2004-11-09 15:23:07 -0800 (Tue, 09 Nov 2004) New Revision: 1186 Modified: gen2/trunk/src/linux-kernel/infiniband/core/agent.c Log: Fix agent_mad_send PCI mapping and gather address and length

Re: [openib-general] Re: [openib-commits] r1186 - gen2/trunk/src/linux-kernel/infiniband/core

2004-11-09 Thread Roland Dreier
Nitin certainly it does break my x86_64 setup too. Can we revert Nitin back to working set of bits please ? It's actually not an architecture issue -- it's an issue if your node is more than one hop from the SM. You should be able to use the patch I just posted to get things working

Re: [openib-general] Re: [openib-commits] r1186 - gen2/trunk/src/linux-kernel/infiniband/core

2004-11-09 Thread Tom Duffy
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 16:01 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: Nitin certainly it does break my x86_64 setup too. Can we revert Nitin back to working set of bits please ? It's actually not an architecture issue -- it's an issue if your node is more than one hop from the SM. You should be

Re: [openib-general] Re: [openib-commits] r1186 - gen2/trunk/src/linux-kernel/infiniband/core

2004-11-09 Thread Nitin Hande
Roland Dreier wrote: Nitin certainly it does break my x86_64 setup too. Can we revert Nitin back to working set of bits please ? It's actually not an architecture issue -- it's an issue if your node is more than one hop from the SM. You should be able to use the patch I just posted