[openib-general] OpenIB repository down?

2005-06-17 Thread Robert Walsh
Hi all, Is the OpenIB subversion repository dead at the moment? It's just sitting there for me when I try to do an update or a checkout. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934

Re: [openib-general] 2.6.12 Kernel OpenIB support

2005-07-10 Thread Robert Walsh
. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043

Re: [openib-general] svn:ignore property stuff

2005-09-27 Thread Robert Walsh
:-) -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043. ___ openib-general mailing

[openib-general] InfiniPath driver announcement

2005-09-28 Thread Robert Walsh
, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043

[openib-general] Re: IPoIB stuff

2005-09-28 Thread Robert Walsh
, you know about that, then ;-) Oddly enough, it doesn't affect me when I try to build 2.6.13: must be something either to do with the Lustre patch or something else in his .config that I don't have. Anyway, the patch he sent me is attached. It's pretty simple. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh

Re: [openib-general] InfiniPath driver announcement

2005-09-29 Thread Robert Walsh
tonight or tomorrow. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043

Re: [openib-general] InfiniPath driver announcement

2005-10-11 Thread Robert Walsh
and finishing the userland stuff. Thanks for doing this! Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043

Re: [openib-general] InfiniPath driver announcement

2005-10-11 Thread Robert Walsh
. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: [openib-general] InfiniPath driver announcement

2005-10-12 Thread Robert Walsh
I got my system set up again. I needed the following patch to work with the latest kernel (which no longer has io_remap_page_range). I'm also throwing in a warning cleanup. Applied. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc

Re: [openib-general] InfiniPath driver announcement

2005-10-12 Thread Robert Walsh
. libipath is already taken with something else we ship, so I can't use that. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View

Re: [openib-general] InfiniPath driver announcement

2005-10-12 Thread Robert Walsh
over well here. The next thing is, can svn handle directory name changes? -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View

Re: [openib-general] InfiniPath driver announcement

2005-10-12 Thread Robert Walsh
the old directory and created a new one. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043

[openib-general] Re: Initial ipath review brain dump

2005-10-15 Thread Robert Walsh
for the feedback. We're going to review all of these early next week and we'll get back to you then. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200

[openib-general] Re: Initial ipath review brain dump

2005-10-17 Thread Robert Walsh
, then the 2.6.15 window for core changes will close by the end of next week, so it's a good idea to get any generic stuff merged ASAP] Right. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934

[openib-general] Multipathing

2005-11-22 Thread Robert Walsh
Hi all, Is multipathing implemented/working in OpenIB? Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain

Re: [openib-general] Changes to core drivers to support RD

2005-11-30 Thread Robert Walsh
, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043. ___ openib

[openib-general] ip_dev_find resolution?

2005-12-05 Thread Robert Walsh
Hi all, There was some discussion back in Sep/Oct about ip_dev_find. Was there ever a resolution to this? Are we just waiting to get the modules that use it put into the kernel so we can justify getting it re-exported once again? Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 07/13] [RFC] ipath core misc files

2005-12-17 Thread Robert Walsh
. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043. ___ openib-general

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 07/13] [RFC] ipath core misc files

2005-12-17 Thread Robert Walsh
set_page_dirty_lock(). OK. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 03/13] [RFC] ipath copy routines

2005-12-17 Thread Robert Walsh
On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 14:38 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: On 12/17/05, Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +#define TRUE 1 +#define FALSE 0 Please kill these. OK. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 01/13] [RFC] ipath basic headers

2005-12-17 Thread Robert Walsh
inlines instead for readability. OK. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 01/13] [RFC] ipath basic headers

2005-12-17 Thread Robert Walsh
a very odd wrapper anyway? The volatile is there so the compiler doesn't optimize away the read. This is important, because reads of our hardware have side-effects and cannot be optimized out. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 01/13] [RFC] ipath basic headers

2005-12-17 Thread Robert Walsh
as unsigned long long. Some use unsigned long. Best way of implmenting the all-ones pattern is just `-1'. OK. Gee. Big driver. Tell me about it :-) Basically, we're doing infiniband in software: no offload. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 03/13] [RFC] ipath copy routines

2005-12-17 Thread Robert Walsh
+ movl %edx,%ecx + rep + movsd + ret err, we have a portability problem. Any chance we could get these moved into the x86_64 arch directory, then? We have to do double-word copies, or our chip gets unhappy. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 01/13] [RFC] ipath basic headers

2005-12-17 Thread Robert Walsh
() and family most like; they already take care of this anyway. Oh, OK then. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH 13/13] [RFC] ipath Kconfig and Makefile

2005-12-17 Thread Robert Walsh
what I can do. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH 13/13] [RFC] ipath Kconfig and Makefile

2005-12-17 Thread Robert Walsh
) including a description what and how you are measuring? I'll try get around to this after my vacation and after we've had time to absorb and address all the other feedback we received. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 07/13] [RFC] ipath core misc files

2005-12-17 Thread Robert Walsh
On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 19:10 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: Robert Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +int ipath_mlock(unsigned long start_page, size_t num_pages, struct page **p) OK. It's perhaps not a very well named function. Really? Suggestion for a better name

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 03/13] [RFC] ipath copy routines

2005-12-17 Thread Robert Walsh
. the Linux Networx LS/X.) Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 03/13] [RFC] ipath copy routines

2005-12-17 Thread Robert Walsh
On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 04:27 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: Robert Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Any chance we could get these moved into the x86_64 arch directory, then? We have to do double-word copies, or our chip gets unhappy. Standard memcpy will do double word copies if everything

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 03/13] [RFC] ipath copy routines

2005-12-18 Thread Robert Walsh
this driver. To avoid breaking `make allmodconfig'. How about we implement a portable version in C that you get by default if you don't implement the assembler routine? Pretty please? :-) Sure. :-) -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH 10/13] [RFC] ipath verbs, part 1

2005-12-18 Thread Robert Walsh
a closer look. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH 13/13] [RFC] ipath Kconfig and Makefile

2005-12-19 Thread Robert Walsh
compared to -objs No problem. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 01/13] [RFC] ipath basic headers

2005-12-19 Thread Robert Walsh
in magic typedef for s32 and friends in userland, that won't work, hence we use the C standard typedefs. Is this a problem? Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 08/13] [RFC] ipath core last bit

2005-12-20 Thread Robert Walsh
that all files in there have. For consistency, I'll leave it as EXPORT_SYMBOL, but I don't have any real problems with it either way. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117

Re: [openib-general] Pathscale driver build broken in SVN5330

2006-02-07 Thread Robert Walsh
the feedback from lkml. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0/4] [RFC] Consolidate modify_qp checks

2006-02-10 Thread Robert Walsh
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 16:51 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: Here is a series of patches that adds a new function ib_modify_qp_is_ok(), which low-level drivers can use to replace boilerplate logic for validating the parameters to the modify_qp method. In addition to getting rid of duplicated

Re: [openib-general] Plans for libibverbs 1.0, 1.1 and beyond

2006-02-16 Thread Robert Walsh
libsysfs is unmaintained, and the main user of it (udev) has stopped using it. So it's going to bitrot and get dropped from distros. And libsysfs kind of sucks too. Fair enough - that's a good reason. Regards, Robert. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 18 of 20] ipath - kbuild infrastructure

2006-03-13 Thread Robert Walsh
about this (I was swamped with unrelated stuff.) I'll try get someone else here at PathScale to get these numbers. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court

[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 8 of 18] ipath - sysfs and ipathfs support for core driver

2006-03-23 Thread Robert Walsh
mounting it on /ipathfs. Not that the difference is terribly important. But if you do have suggestions on where this kind of thing should go, I'd love to hear it. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH 9 of 18] ipath - char devices for diagnostics and lightweight subnet management

2006-03-23 Thread Robert Walsh
out the guts of ipath_mad.c and had it pass the requests to the userspace SMA, we'd still have to have the diversion path in there for cases where the IB stack isn't around. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] IB/ipath: Make more names static

2006-04-03 Thread Robert Walsh
be used by the ipath_ether driver. That would be a good cleanup too but I'll leave that for another day. Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Roland. I'll merge them in as appropriate. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] IB/ipath: Make more names static

2006-04-04 Thread Robert Walsh
- dev-node_type = IB_NODE_CA; + dev-node_type = RDMA_NODE_IB_CA; Which of these #defines is valid in 2.6.17? Just curious. What we have in svn matches what you put in your git tree, you see... Perhaps an #ifdef until 2.6.17 goes through? Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] IB/ipath: Make more names static

2006-04-04 Thread Robert Walsh
. The svn tree has some iWARP-related changes that make it RDMA_NODE_IB_CA, but those haven't been merged upstream and won't be in 2.6.17. Would an ifdef be OK? -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650

Re: [openib-general] Please don't commit without maintainer approval

2006-04-09 Thread Robert Walsh
it for ages. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QLogic Corporation Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043

[openib-general] CentOS machines?

2006-04-11 Thread Robert Walsh
Do we have any CentOS 4.2 or 4.3 machines? Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043

[openib-general] Re: CentOS machines?

2006-04-11 Thread Robert Walsh
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 15:31 -0700, Robert Walsh wrote: Do we have any CentOS 4.2 or 4.3 machines? People on openib-general can ignore this :-) I meant to send it to an internal alias. Sorry for the bother. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] remove kernel drivers from svn

2006-04-20 Thread Robert Walsh
in OpenFabrics, but just about every developer here shot the idea down as a step backwards, development-wise. Chalk that one up to religion. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QLogic Corporation

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] Fix ipathverbs compile

2006-06-02 Thread Robert Walsh
updates from the libipathverbs end. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043

Re: [openib-general] Serialization in ib_uverbs

2006-06-05 Thread Robert Walsh
It does seem to be a scalability problem for some devices/workloads, and Robert Walsh from qlogic was planning on looking at this (replacing the mutex with a reference counting scheme). I don't know if he's started on this or not. Not yet, but I'll be starting this as soon as I'm done

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] [PATCH] IB/uverbs: Don't serialize with ib_uverbs_idr_mutex

2006-06-12 Thread Robert Walsh
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 12:36 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: IB/uverbs: Don't serialize with ib_uverbs_idr_mutex This looks good - I had started something similar but your solution solves some problems mine had (by using the live flag, even if it is kind of bleh.) Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] [PATCH] IB/uverbs: Don't serialize with ib_uverbs_idr_mutex

2006-06-13 Thread Robert Walsh
. I'll fix that up, too. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043. signature.asc

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] [PATCH] IB/uverbs: Don't serialize with ib_uverbs_idr_mutex

2006-06-16 Thread Robert Walsh
On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 15:07 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: Robert, can you confirm that the new uverbs locking scheme helps the performance problems you're having? Sure - I'll take a look on Monday. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [openib-general] [RFC] [PATCH] IB/uverbs: Don't serialize with ib_uverbs_idr_mutex

2006-06-19 Thread Robert Walsh
On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 15:07 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: Robert, can you confirm that the new uverbs locking scheme helps the performance problems you're having? Yup - that was a big help. Thanks! Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [openib-general] max_send_sge max_sge

2006-06-26 Thread Robert Walsh
the SMA, maybe? -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: [openib-general] max_send_sge max_sge

2006-06-26 Thread Robert Walsh
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 15:53 -0700, Robert Walsh wrote: On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 17:53 -0400, Pete Wyckoff wrote: Using stock 2.6.17.1, with verbs 1.0.3-1.fc4 and mthca 1.0.2-1.fc4 with MT25204, this line: ret = ibv_query_device(ctx, hca_cap); tells me that hca_cap.max_sge = 30

Re: [openib-general] drop mthca from svn?

2006-08-24 Thread Robert Walsh
Roland Dreier wrote: Sean Why not remove your code from SVN? Along those lines, how would people feel if I removed the mthca kernel code from svn, and just maintained mthca in kernel.org git trees? I am getting heartily sick of double checkins for every mthca change... I think this is

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 22 of 23] IB/ipath - print warning if LID not acquired within one minute

2006-08-25 Thread Robert Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Roland Dreier wrote: 1) What makes ipath special so that we want this warning for ipath devices but not other IB hardware? There's nothing special about our hardware that requires this. We just wanted that in there so we could direct customers to

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 22 of 23] IB/ipath - print warning if LID not acquired within one minute

2006-08-27 Thread Robert Walsh
Roland Dreier wrote: Michael Looks like your devices are all single-port. With a multi Michael port device it is quite common to have one port down. My reading of the patch is that it warns if the link is up physically but does not come up logically. Which would still be reasonable

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 22 of 23] IB/ipath - print warning if LID not acquired within one minute

2006-08-28 Thread Robert Walsh
J Why not copy what most ethernet drivers do and just log a message on link negotiation state changes? ie like the: eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x45E1 Maybe something like: ib0: link up, 10Gbps, port active, lid 0x10/16 That's a neat idea.

Re: [openib-general] OFED 1.1-rc3 is ready

2006-09-01 Thread Robert Walsh
Woodruff, Robert J wrote: Robert Walsh wrote, [0][rdma_iba_priv_intel.c:429] error(0x60029): OpenIB-cma: Could not create DAPL endpoint: DAT_INVALID_PARAMETER(DAT_INVALID_ARG6) [1][rdma_iba_priv_intel.c:429] error(0x60029): OpenIB-cma: Could not create DAPL endpoint: DAT_INVALID_PARAMETER

Re: [openib-general] OFED 1.1-rc3 is ready

2006-09-01 Thread Robert Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Walsh wrote: Hi all, I installed the RC3 package on my Xeon/Lindenhurst platforms and with the pathscale card I have the following problem when trying to run Intel MPI and NetPipe. Actually, I've been trying to run Intel MPI myself

Re: [openib-general] OFED 1.1-rc3 is ready

2006-09-01 Thread Robert Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hmm, if you have a debug version of the DAPL library, can you enable debug messages, export DAPL_DBG_TYPE=0x That may give us more information. I will also have Arlin take a look at this when returns on Tues. I've been using the stuff from

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] OFED 1.1-rc3 is ready

2006-09-05 Thread Robert Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Arlin Davis wrote: Robert, Here is a slightly modified patch for your attributes issue. Can you give it a try? I'll give it a spin this afternoon: it looks quite a bit more comprehensive than the small patch I did. Regards, Robert.

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] OFED 1.1-rc3 is ready

2006-09-05 Thread Robert Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just added all appropriate RDMA in/out fields and some code to zero out the structure to avoid uninitialized data fields. Yup. By comprehensive, I meant better :-) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] OFED 1.1-rc3 is ready

2006-09-05 Thread Robert Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Arlin Davis wrote: Robert, Here is a slightly modified patch for your attributes issue. Can you give it a try? Oddly enough, I'm back to the same problem with your new patch as I saw with the unpatched version: $ mpiexec -n 2 ./a.out

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] OFED 1.1-rc3 is ready

2006-09-05 Thread Robert Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Oddly enough, I'm back to the same problem with your new patch as I saw with the unpatched version: Hmmm. We ran this with OFED 1.1 RC3 and MPI 3.0b on an EM64T server with your adapter and it worked. Weird - it's not working for me at all.

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] OFED 1.1-rc3 is ready

2006-09-05 Thread Robert Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Woodruff, Robert J wrote: Robert Walsh wrote, I'll give it a spin this afternoon: it looks quite a bit more comprehensive than the small patch I did. I also just tried running the ib_rdma_bw test and it seems to be flaky if you stress

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] OFED 1.1-rc3 is ready

2006-09-05 Thread Robert Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Here is a slightly modified patch for your attributes issue. Can you give it a try? I rebuilt OFED from scratch with the patch, and ran successfully on Intel MPI 2.0.1 with the refresh patch. I could not get it to run on Intel MPI 3.0b. If you

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] OFED 1.1-rc3 is ready

2006-09-06 Thread Robert Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tziporet Koren wrote: Robert Walsh wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Here is a slightly modified patch for your attributes issue. Can you give it a try? I rebuilt OFED from scratch with the patch, and ran

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] OFED 1.1-rc3 is ready

2006-09-06 Thread Robert Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I spoke with our MPI team lead and it is very likely that the fix that is in 2.0.1-refresh did not make it into 3.0 beta, but it should be in the 3.0 release schedule to be completed in a couple of weeks. OK then - I'll wait for that. Regards,

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] OFED 1.1-rc3 is ready

2006-09-07 Thread Robert Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Woodruff, Robert J wrote: Robert Walsh wrote, I'll give it a spin this afternoon: it looks quite a bit more comprehensive than the small patch I did. I also just tried running the ib_rdma_bw test and it seems to be flaky if you stress

Re: [openib-general] RFC: mthca: implement timewait by tracking QPNs

2006-09-11 Thread Robert Walsh
Could be a library function in core so that ipath etc can reuse it. But note how there's no dependency between drivers here - no reason to block change in mthca until ipath/ehca implement this functionality, too. True. But FWIW, we (QLogic) could probably spin something like this pretty

[openib-general] ibv_driver_init renamed?

2006-09-12 Thread Robert Walsh
Somewhere between OFED-1.1-RC3 and -RC4, the ibv_driver_init function was renamed to openib_driver_init. We at QLogic were aware this change was being made and so now our user verbs support does not work at all in RC4. Why did something like this happen between two release candidates?

Re: [openib-general] [openfabrics-ewg] OFED-1.1-rc4 is ready

2006-09-13 Thread Robert Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I don't think you can do symbol versioning here. Right - probably being a little more verbose about finding the file but not the symbol would be a good idea, though. It took me a bit of gdb work to track the problem down: not really a big deal, but

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] OFED 1.1-rc3 is ready

2006-09-14 Thread Robert Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I installed RC5 and now it just hangs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ ./ib_rdma_bw -n 1 -t 1000 -s 200 rkl-12 4702: | port=18515 | ib_port=1 | size=200 | tx_depth=1000 | iters=1 | duplex=0 | cma=0 | 4702: Local address: LID 0x03, QPN

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] OFED 1.1-rc3 is ready

2006-09-14 Thread Robert Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I installed RC5 and now it just hangs, Wow - we can't even get RC5 to build here. What distro are you running? I've tried this on RC4 + a fixed libipathverbs package and it runs OK (although it does take a while, which might explain the hang you

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] OFED 1.1-rc3 is ready

2006-09-14 Thread Robert Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Woodruff, Robert J wrote: Robert Walsh wrote, [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ ./ib_rdma_bw -n 1 -t 1000 -s 200 rkl-12 4730: | port=18515 | ib_port=1 | size=200 | tx_depth=1000 | iters=1 | duplex=0 | cma=0 | 4730: Local address: LID 0x03

[openib-general] gen2_basic patches

2006-09-19 Thread Robert Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, We've got some patches to gen2_basic to fix some problems with the test suite. Some are trivial (fix typos, etc.) and some are more serious (handle max_qp counts correctly, etc.) I'm going to be sending them out piecemeal as we review them

[openib-general] gen2_basic patch 1/10: fix some minor typos

2006-09-19 Thread Robert Walsh
gen2_basic - fix some minor typos Signed-off by: Robert Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -rNu a/gen2_basic/test_cq.c b/gen2_basic/test_cq.c --- a/gen2_basic/test_cq.c 2006-07-27 13:42:44.857603000 -0700 +++ b/gen2_basic/test_cq.c 2006-08-14 14:17:17.352167000 -0700 @@ -1,5 +1,6

[openib-general] gen2_basic patch 2/10: fix up some compiler warnings

2006-09-19 Thread Robert Walsh
gen2_basic - fix up some compiler warnings Create a new CHECK_PVALUE macro for checking pointers and use it where appropriate. This makes a bunch of compiler printf warnings go away. Signed-off by: Robert Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -rNu a/gen2_basic/test_cq.c b/gen2_basic/test_cq.c

[openib-general] gen2_basic patch 3/10: fix is_global settings for AH attributes

2006-09-19 Thread Robert Walsh
gen2_basic - fix is_global settings for AH attributes For valid address handles, the is_global field of the AH attribute should not be a random number if the dlid is a multicast LID. Signed-off by: Robert Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -rNu a/gen2_basic/main.h b/gen2_basic/main.h --- a/gen2_basic

[openib-general] gen2_basic patch 4/10: make sure the DLID is valid

2006-09-19 Thread Robert Walsh
gen2_basic - make sure the DLID is valid For valid address handles, make sure the DLID is not a multicast LID. You can't modify a QP to use a multicast DLID using ib_modify_qp(). Signed-off by: Robert Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -rNu a/gen2_basic/test_cq.c b/gen2_basic/test_cq.c

[openib-general] gen2_basic patch 5/10: select a valid port number

2006-09-19 Thread Robert Walsh
gen2_basic - select a valid port number Port numbers start at 1, not 0. Signed-off by: Robert Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -rNu a/gen2_basic/test_poll_post.c b/gen2_basic/test_poll_post.c --- a/gen2_basic/test_poll_post.c 2006-09-13 19:09:47.410808000 -0700 +++ b/gen2_basic

[openib-general] gen2_basic patch 6/10: handle case where max_sge 100

2006-09-19 Thread Robert Walsh
gen2_basic - handle case where max_sge 100 When choosing an illegal number of maximum SGEs, handle the case where the device allows more than 100 SGEs. Signed-off by: Robert Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -rNu a/gen2_basic/test_poll_post.c b/gen2_basic/test_poll_post.c --- a/gen2_basic

Re: [openib-general] gen2_basic patch 5/10: select a valid port number

2006-09-19 Thread Robert Walsh
Hal Rosenstock wrote: On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 20:28, Robert Walsh wrote: gen2_basic - select a valid port number Port numbers start at 1, not 0. True for CA and routers but not switches. Yeah. Does anyone run gen2_basic on switches, though? I assumed it was HCA-centric. Regards, Robert

Re: [openib-general] gen2_basic patch 5/10: select a valid port number

2006-09-19 Thread Robert Walsh
Its easy to get linux running on a switch, so why not? You just need to write a low level driver that cn send/receve MADs. We did run a gen1 port on a switch at some point, and someone might want to do it again. OK - that's a fine project idea, but I'm not about to start coding it up any

Re: [openib-general] gen2_basic patches

2006-09-20 Thread Robert Walsh
Dotan Barak wrote: Dotan Barak wrote: Robert Walsh wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, We've got some patches to gen2_basic to fix some problems with the test suite. Some are trivial (fix typos, etc.) and some are more serious (handle max_qp counts correctly

[openib-general] gen2_basic patch boogum?

2006-09-20 Thread Robert Walsh
Hi Dotan, I just noticed that you didn't apply one of my patch hunks that called get_is_global(). I know why you didn't do it (the dlid is always 0: see line 218 of test_av.c), but should you still be setting the is_global field in the ah_attr structure to some value? Right now, it will just be

Re: [openib-general] gen2_basic patch boogum?

2006-09-20 Thread Robert Walsh
Another quick question: I noticed that in the latest changes your pushed, including my patches, you removed the following check in test_qp.c: @@ -1702,7 +1700,6 @@ CHECK_VALUE(qp_type, query_init_attr.qp_type, attr.qp_type, goto cleanup); CHECK_VALUE_PTR(recv_cq,

[openib-general] gen2_basic patch 7/10: choose illegal max_qp_init_rd_atom values correctly

2006-09-20 Thread Robert Walsh
gen2_basic - choose illegal max_qp_init_rd_atom values correctly Signed-off by: Robert Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -rNu a/gen2_basic/test_qp.c b/gen2_basic/test_qp.c --- a/gen2_basic/test_qp.c 2006-09-13 19:09:47.419791000 -0700 +++ b/gen2_basic/test_qp.c 2006-08-14 14:16:57.911621000

[openib-general] gen2_basic patch 8/10: handle auto path migration properly

2006-09-20 Thread Robert Walsh
gen2_basic - handle auto path migration properly Signed-off by: Robert Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -rNu a/gen2_basic/test_qp.c b/gen2_basic/test_qp.c --- a/gen2_basic/test_qp.c 2006-09-13 19:15:59.829006000 -0700 +++ b/gen2_basic/test_qp.c 2006-08-14 14:16:57.911621000 -0700 @@ -586,6

[openib-general] gen2_basic patch 9/10: fix static_rate check

2006-09-20 Thread Robert Walsh
gen2_basic - fix static_rate check Make sure we're comparing apples to apples in the static_rate check. Signed-off by: Robert Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -rNu a/gen2_basic/test_qp.c b/gen2_basic/test_qp.c --- a/gen2_basic/test_qp.c 2006-09-13 19:17:17.835923000 -0700 +++ b/gen2_basic

[openib-general] gen2_basic patch 10/10: handle other vendor devices for max QP count

2006-09-20 Thread Robert Walsh
gen2_basic - handle other vendor devices for max QP count When choosing the actual max QP number, handle non-Mellanox devices too. Make sure we only clean up the QPs we actually created. Signed-off by: Robert Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -rNu a/gen2_basic/test_qp.c b/gen2_basic/test_qp.c

Re: [openib-general] gen2_basic patch boogum?

2006-09-21 Thread Robert Walsh
All the rest of the attributes (for example: is_global) are being set with 0. Oh, OK - I wasn't sure that you wanted it set that way or randomly like it used to be. No biggie. Regards, Robert. ___ openib-general mailing list

Re: [openib-general] problems with lustre o2ib module ofed

2006-09-24 Thread Robert Walsh
Thierry Delaitre wrote: I get the following when loading lustre o2ib module. I'm using ofed-1.1 rc6 on sles10 and i'm sure the ib modules are the ones recompiled for the kernel i'm using and lustre too. I don't understand why i get the following as i only have one version of the ib modules ?

Re: [openib-general] [openfabrics-ewg] OFED Status

2006-10-02 Thread Robert Walsh
Robert Walsh wrote: The attached patch fixes this problem by deferring creation of our diagpkt device until at least one piece of hardware has been found. Of course, if I'd actually attached the patch, it might have been a bit more useful :-) IB/ipath - initialize diagpkt file on device init

Re: [openib-general] [openfabrics-ewg] OFED Status

2006-10-02 Thread Robert Walsh
The attached patch fixes this problem by deferring creation of our diagpkt device until at least one piece of hardware has been found. Michael: this will fix the OFED testing problem you were seeing. Roland: please queue for 2.6.19. Regards, Robert.

Re: [openib-general] [openfabrics-ewg] OFED Status

2006-10-03 Thread Robert Walsh
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: Quoting r. Robert Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: [openfabrics-ewg] OFED Status The attached patch fixes this problem by deferring creation of our diagpkt device until at least one piece of hardware has been found. Michael: this will fix the OFED testing

Re: [openib-general] [openfabrics-ewg] OFED Status

2006-10-03 Thread Robert Walsh
This seems dangerous, especially now that we have PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE: nothing prevents ipath_cdev_init() from being called twice. Better to use something like test_and_set_bit() to make sure this is done exactly once. Well, it needs to be refcounted, as we need to create it on first

  1   2   >