Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 28] ipath patches for 2.6.19

2006-10-03 Thread Bryan O'Sullivan
Eric W. Biederman wrote: Sure. I talked to Dave Olson about this a while ago, and I couldn't get anything happening. Driver authors tend to find imminent breakage quite stimulating, in my experience :-) b ___ openib-general mailing list

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 28] ipath patches for 2.6.19

2006-10-02 Thread ebiederm
Bryan O'Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Eric W. Biederman wrote: Have you tested your driver against the -mm tree? No. To the best of my knowledge the irq handling of your hypertransport card is a complete and total hack that works only by chance. And a happy Monday morning to you,

Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 28] ipath patches for 2.6.19

2006-09-29 Thread ebiederm
Bryan O'Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, Roland - This patch series brings the ipath driver almost up to date with what's in our internal tree. The only substantial thing missing is the memcpy_cachebypass patch that I sent out a while back and haven't had time to rework. These

[openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 28] ipath patches for 2.6.19

2006-09-28 Thread Bryan O'Sullivan
Hi, Roland - This patch series brings the ipath driver almost up to date with what's in our internal tree. The only substantial thing missing is the memcpy_cachebypass patch that I sent out a while back and haven't had time to rework. These patches have seen a lot of testing, including on a git