On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:30:47 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
> Added 2 `@defaultValue` and fixed the incorrect default for `editable`. Also
> corrected a typo that doesn't show anyway
> in the docs.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: a3699381
Author:Nir Lisker
URL:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:30:47 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
> Added 2 `@defaultValue` and fixed the incorrect default for `editable`. Also
> corrected a typo that doesn't show anyway
> in the docs.
Marked as reviewed by kcr (Lead).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/323
Approved.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 6:46 PM Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> I request approval to backport the changes from the just-released
> October 2020 CPU to 11-dev (for 11.0.9) and the jfx15 branch of jfx (for
> 15.0.1).
>
>
Looks good to me, +1.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Rushforth
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 9:36 PM
To: Johan Vos ; Ambarish Rapte
; openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RFR: Request to sync October 2020 CPU changes into jfx
Johan and Ambarish,
I request approval to sync changes
Hi Johan,
I request approval to backport the changes from the just-released
October 2020 CPU to 11-dev (for 11.0.9) and the jfx15 branch of jfx (for
15.0.1).
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/cpu-2010-sync/11-dev/webrev/
https://github.com/kevinrushforth/jfx/compare/4b75750...15-cpu-2010-sync
Approved.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 6:07 PM Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> Johan and Ambarish,
>
> I request approval to sync changes from to the just-released October
> 2020 CPU release into the 'master' branch of the 'jfx' repo. Here is the
> aggregate set of changes for the fixes:
>
>
Johan and Ambarish,
I request approval to sync changes from to the just-released October
2020 CPU release into the 'master' branch of the 'jfx' repo. Here is the
aggregate set of changes for the fixes:
https://github.com/kevinrushforth/jfx/compare/01ba6e1e41...cpu-2010-sync
NOTE: Since this
> On Oct 20, 2020, at 8:56 AM, Davide Perini
> wrote:
>
> GUIManager.class.getResource
Not finding it? Not sure why that would be different OS X though.
Recently moved a (non-jfx) project to Eclipse and had to change
class.getResourceAsStream to ClassLoader.getResourceAsStream. Because
I'm creating my binary file using JPackage but I don't signed the binary.
can this be the problem.
why a simple line like this
FXMLLoader fxmlLoader =new FXMLLoader(GUIManager.class.getResource( fxml +
Constants.FXML));
return null if it works on WIndows and Linux?
Thanks
Davide
Il
I worked with JavaFX on MacOS since 2013 and except for issues related to font
rendering I never got the impression that MacOS is the black sheep. I also
happen to know that many of the developers that are working on JavaFX use MacOS.
Dirk
> On Oct 20, 2020, at 12:28 PM, Davide Perini
>
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:12:41 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Increase release version to 15.0.1
> Fix for JDK-8255042
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 86ff5dea
Author:Johan Vos
URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/commit/86ff5dea
Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0
Well, you don't give a enough information (no stacktrace, no context, ...).
If you have reproducable code please share it (with the current
information provided I highly doubt this is an issue in Java/JavaFX).
Tom
Am 20.10.20 um 12:28 schrieb Davide Perini:
Hi all,
this code works well on
It is a test cleanup work.
Issue :
Many unit tests in javafx.controls module have incorrect naming that use text
"impl_" in names and comments.
The test code correctly avoids using impl_* methods (as they were removed in
JDK 9), but test names still have "impl_"
in them.
Fix :
These tests are
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:12:41 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Increase release version to 15.0.1
> Fix for JDK-8255042
Marked as reviewed by kcr (Lead).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/325
Hi all,
this code works well on both Windows and Linux running Java 15 on JavaFX 15.
FXMLLoader fxmlLoader =new FXMLLoader(GUIManager.class.getResource( fxml +
Constants.FXML)); return fxmlLoader.load();
It doesn't work on Macos returning a nullpointer exception.
Any idea? Why Macos is
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:26:43 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
>> Marked as reviewed by kcr (Lead).
>
> Reverting #153 seems right, I don't have any specific comments. Please go
> ahead and merge the change.
@johanvos @jperedadnr
A unit-test would be great, otherwise, it would be very hard to fix the
Increase release version to 15.0.1
Fix for JDK-8255042
-
Commit messages:
- Increase release version to 15.0.1
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/325/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx=325=00
Issue:
17 matches
Mail list logo