I'm getting this error in Eclipse when it tries to load the tasks, but in
the command line I can build and test. I already refreshed the dependencies
and cleaned the cache.
Did you solve this in Eclipse?
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 1:44 PM Jeanette Winzenburg
wrote:
>
> Thanks Johan, Ajit
>
>
On Tue, 18 May 2021 20:05:03 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Require at least MacOSX 11.0 to build on mac-AArch64.
> Don't increase minimum SDK version when building on x86-64 (contrary to
> JDK-8265031)
Marked as reviewed by kcr (Lead).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/pull/21
Are there any deprecated or removed (1) (2) dependencies that could cause
problems?
(1) https://jdk.java.net/16/release-notes#removed
(2) https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-dev/2021-March/005191.html
Eric Bresie
ebre...@gmail.com (mailto:ebre...@gmail.com)
> On May 18, 2021 at 4:42:45
You raise a good point about whether or not it should matter if a
version is (generally considered to be) an LTS release. I wasn't
suggesting that we necessarily wait until the next LTS to consider
picking up an important new feature, just that it could be one factor. I
also would be very
>
> there are some advantages in being able to run with the latest JDK LTS
>
One *potential* issue with this approach is that LTS is not defined in
OpenJDK as far as I know. The LTS versions are a business decision of each
distributor. For now, they have all aligned on 8, 11, 17, but nothing
As noted in the thread you quoted below, removing the dependency on
java.desktop from javafx.base isn't a particularly hard problem, and is
tracked by JDK-8240844 [1]. And even though it will require a spec
change (meaning a CSR), it doesn't result in any loss of functionality,
since in order
I use JFX with NetBeans every day with no problems. NetBeans 12.3 and JFX
16 on OpenJDK16
SceneBuilder creates the dialogs. NetBeans writes the code. The NB JFX is
too old. You have to update from Maven (which is, itself, still stuck on
old versions of JFX -- hasn't been updated for some
I would also be surprised if printing and bean adapters are used much, but
what are the options? Rewrite the printing implementation.
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:45 PM Tom Schindl
wrote:
> Uff - I'd like to revisit this topic. As I did some jlink stuff for our
> applications adding java.desktop
Hi,
Am Dienstag, dem 18.05.2021 um 08:17 -0700 schrieb Kevin Rushforth:
>
> In general, we only guarantee that JavaFX N runs on JDK N-1 or later. In
> practice, though, we don't bump it for each release, as there are some
> advantages in being able to run with the latest JDK LTS. Since JavaFX
Require at least MacOSX 11.0 to build on mac-AArch64.
Don't increase minimum SDK version when building on x86-64 (contrary to
JDK-8265031)
-
Commit messages:
- Increase minimum SDK version when building on AArch64
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/pull/21/files
Webrev:
On Tue, 18 May 2021 18:27:10 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Co-authored-by: Johan Vos
> Reviewed-by: jvos, kcr
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 7e16449b
Author:Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/commit/7e16449b2bdeb093b14c1433459bfeb0e49a9f91
Stats:
On Thu, 13 May 2021 21:55:59 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> This PR fixes the gradle deprecation warnings described in
>> [JDK-8240336](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240336) and updates
>> the JavaFX build to use gradle 7.0.1 as described in
>>
Co-authored-by: Johan Vos
Reviewed-by: jvos, kcr
-
Commit messages:
- 8257895: Allow building of JavaFX media libs for Apple Silicon
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/pull/20/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx11u=20=00
Issue:
On Tue, 18 May 2021 15:06:05 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
> Fixes a css style regression issue caused by
> [JDK-8204568](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204568).
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: b2d930e7
Author:Ambarish Rapte
URL:
On Tue, 18 May 2021 17:11:35 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Reviewed-by: kcr
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: d3ba1cec
Author:Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/commit/d3ba1cec162e63bfd850de08e112d8bf43006cf1
Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins;
On Tue, 18 May 2021 17:12:17 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> Reviewed-by: kcr
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 37d25bce
Author:Johan Vos
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/commit/37d25bce9a917677381a2675d7d75b5ae3e7165f
Stats: 10 lines in 1 file changed: 9
On Sat, 8 May 2021 14:13:34 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> As noted in PR #212 the unused `tools/scripts/build.ps1` script no longer
> works. This script was added in support of the Appveyor builds in the old
> `javafxports/openjdk-jfx` sandbox repo, which haven't been used in nearly two
>
Uff - I'd like to revisit this topic. As I did some jlink stuff for our
applications adding java.desktop once more bugged me.
I guess the first thing to do is to file a JIRA-Ticket but it really
starts to bug me to include java.desktop although I don't plan to use
printing (and I guess > 90%
Reviewed-by: kcr
-
Commit messages:
- 8264536: Building OpenJFX on Apple AARCH64 not possible
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/pull/18/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx11u=18=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8264536
Stats: 1
Reviewed-by: kcr
-
Commit messages:
- 8257758: Allow building of JavaFX native libs for Apple Silicon
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/pull/19/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx11u=19=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8257758
Sounds good, although it is a bit unfortunate that sealed classes will
only be un-previewed in JDK 17. I think this feature has great value
for reasoning about code, in particular for library development. Do
you think we could bump it directly to JDK 17, which I think is very
fitting because it's
Fixes a css style regression issue caused by
[JDK-8204568](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204568).
-
Commit messages:
- 8266966: Wrong CSS properties are applied to other nodes after fix for
JDK-8204568
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/pull/17/files
A very timely question. I was already planning to raise this as a
discussion after we update our boot JDK to JDK 16 (blocked by the
in-progress gradle 7 update), which I hope to do later this week.
I think that this is the right time to consider bumping the minimum
required version to run
On Sat, 8 May 2021 14:13:34 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> As noted in PR #212 the unused `tools/scripts/build.ps1` script no longer
> works. This script was added in support of the Appveyor builds in the old
> `javafxports/openjdk-jfx` sandbox repo, which haven't been used in nearly two
>
Currently, JDK 11 is required for the latest version of OpenJFX. What
is the policy for bumping this requirement? Does it always correspond
to the latest JDK LTS release (the next of which will be JDK 17), or
is it independent from the release cycle of OpenJDK?
On Tue, 18 May 2021 10:14:11 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> Fixing ListCell editing status is true, when index changes while editing.
>
> Florian Kirmaier has updated the pull request incrementally with two
> additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - 8264127
>fixed assertion
On Tue, 18 May 2021 10:14:11 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> Fixing ListCell editing status is true, when index changes while editing.
>
> Florian Kirmaier has updated the pull request incrementally with two
> additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - 8264127
>fixed assertion
> Fixing ListCell editing status is true, when index changes while editing.
Florian Kirmaier has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
- 8264127
fixed assertion text,
exception handler is now installed/uninstalled like in
On Mon, 17 May 2021 08:40:44 GMT, Jeanette Winzenburg
wrote:
>> Florian Kirmaier has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8264127
>> More changes, simplifications and tests based on CR
>
>
On Sat, 8 May 2021 14:13:34 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> As noted in PR #212 the unused `tools/scripts/build.ps1` script no longer
> works. This script was added in support of the Appveyor builds in the old
> `javafxports/openjdk-jfx` sandbox repo, which haven't been used in nearly two
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
