I think this is different. The idea was that you would bind state on the cell
to the item it is representing, so that it is automatically updated when needed
and then there is no need to manually poke it. If the data item isn't
observable, then you need a way to manually poke it.
Richard
On
Ok - this means that in Cell.updateItem I would have to add a (weak?)
listener to the item's state property. If the cell is reused for another
item I would have to remove the old listener first. My only concern is
that this will be done a lot when scrolling through the list. Thanks...
If the
