Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd/back-monitor init.c

2005-08-09 Thread Hallvard B Furuseth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: init.c 1.111 - 1.112 more (in)sanity stuff I haven't looked closely, but I imagine cleaner fix would be to move parts of monitor_back_db_destroy (bi-bi_db_destroy) to bi-bi_destroy. Or maybe parts of monitor_back_initialize to monitor_back_db_init

back-monitor rationalization (Was: commit...)

2005-08-09 Thread Pierangelo Masarati
Hallvard B Furuseth wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: init.c 1.111 - 1.112 more (in)sanity stuff I haven't looked closely, but I imagine cleaner fix would be to move parts of monitor_back_db_destroy (bi-bi_db_destroy) to bi-bi_destroy. Since only one is allowed, there's