[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
init.c 1.111 - 1.112
more (in)sanity stuff
I haven't looked closely, but I imagine cleaner fix would be to move
parts of monitor_back_db_destroy (bi-bi_db_destroy) to bi-bi_destroy.
Or maybe parts of monitor_back_initialize to monitor_back_db_init
Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
init.c 1.111 - 1.112
more (in)sanity stuff
I haven't looked closely, but I imagine cleaner fix would be to move
parts of monitor_back_db_destroy (bi-bi_db_destroy) to bi-bi_destroy.
Since only one is allowed, there's