memberOf attribute (was: commit: ldap/servers/slapd/overlays memberof.c Makefile.in)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: memberof.c NONE - 1.1 Your 'memberOf' attribute definition says { ( 1.2.840.113556.1.2.102 (...) EQUALITY distinguishedNameMatch /* added */ USAGE directoryOperation /* questioned */ /*

Re: accesslog schema

Pierangelo Masarati wrote: Howard Chu wrote: I suppose I should at least write up an Informational RFC to go along with this what's its status? I think the reqControls and reqRespControls (not implemented yet by accesslog; I'm working at it) should have X-ORDERED 'VALUES', as ordering

Re: 2.3 vs 2.4 Features/Differences/Additions List

--On Friday, August 24, 2007 3:22 AM +0200 Pierangelo Masarati [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: More overlays: - slapo-dds (Dynamic Directory Services, RFC 2589) - slapo-memberof (reverse group membership maintenance) New features in existing ones: - slapo-pcache allows cache

(Dumb?) X-ORDERED 'VALUES' question

I'm implementing the Control syntax in draft-chu-ldap-logschema, which is used for the reqControls and reqRespControls as X-ORDERED 'VALUES', and I'm having a little bit of trouble in understanding how I should encode values. Right now, I'm putting the DER encoded controls in the pretty values,

Re: (Dumb?) X-ORDERED 'VALUES' question

--On Friday, August 24, 2007 5:03 PM +0200 Pierangelo Masarati [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm implementing the Control syntax in draft-chu-ldap-logschema, which is used for the reqControls and reqRespControls as X-ORDERED 'VALUES', and I'm having a little bit of trouble in understanding how I

Re: (Dumb?) X-ORDERED 'VALUES' question

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: Maybe unrelated, but this reminds me of the issue I ran into with valsort where adding ordering made it so that I couldn't search on the non-weighted values DO you mean values without {X} intermixed with values with {X}? I'm not sure I understand all the

Re: (Dumb?) X-ORDERED 'VALUES' question

--On Friday, August 24, 2007 7:47 PM +0200 Pierangelo Masarati [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: Maybe unrelated, but this reminds me of the issue I ran into with valsort where adding ordering made it so that I couldn't search on the non-weighted values DO you mean values

Re: accesslog schema

Pierangelo Masarati wrote: Pierangelo Masarati wrote: Howard Chu wrote: I suppose I should at least write up an Informational RFC to go along with this what's its status? I think the reqControls and reqRespControls (not implemented yet by accesslog; I'm working at it) should have X-ORDERED

Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd/overlays dynlist.c

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Update of /repo/OpenLDAP/pkg/ldap/servers/slapd/overlays Modified Files: dynlist.c 1.35 - 1.36 Log Message: Add dgIdentity support test044 is now failing in HEAD... I'm investigating. p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via

Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd/overlays dynlist.c

Pierangelo Masarati wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Update of /repo/OpenLDAP/pkg/ldap/servers/slapd/overlays Modified Files: dynlist.c 1.35 - 1.36 Log Message: Add dgIdentity support test044 is now failing in HEAD... I'm investigating. Yes, I saw that too. Fixed now in HEAD. --

Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd/overlays dynlist.c

Pierangelo Masarati wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Update of /repo/OpenLDAP/pkg/ldap/servers/slapd/overlays Modified Files: dynlist.c 1.35 - 1.36 Log Message: Add dgIdentity support test044 is now failing in HEAD... I'm investigating. Think it's here: you added a call to

Buildbot for our Build Farm (when we get it)

Hi All, Might be worth a look when we get the resources for the central server: http://buildbot.net/trac Gavin. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E [EMAIL PROTECTED] Open Source. Open Solutions(tm).