Howard Chu wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
For reference, the peak throughput with back-null on the previous code was
only 7,800 auths/sec (with 8 client threads). With this patch it's 11,140
auths/sec. In both cases the throughput declines as more client threads are
used. (Compare
Howard Chu writes:
The -O2 build is faster from about 4 to 24 client threads. From 28 on
up, the nonoptimized code is faster at every load level. I was
originally using gcc 4.1.2 but I'm seeing the same result now using
gcc 4.2.2. Also, slapd is only configured with 8 worker threads in all
of
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 11:46:45AM +0100, Michael Ströder wrote:
Dynamic option value/description lists could be easily defined by
defining an LDAP URL which searches the option values. IIRC someone is
already working in this direction to improve slapo-constraint.
I
Hello,
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
[...]
Linked attributes include member/memberOf, master/masteredBy and many
others. They are defined in the AD schema, and as far as I know, are
strictly updated as a pair (they are not flattened memberOf listings,
for example).
[...]
Isn't that what
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:17:04AM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
The -O2 build is faster from about 4 to 24 client threads. From 28 on up,
the nonoptimized code is faster at every load level. I was originally using
gcc 4.1.2 but I'm seeing the same result now using gcc 4.2.2. Also, slapd
is only
Michael Ströder wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
On the whole it doesn't seem like new syntaxes pop up in LDAP specs very
often. Some may say this is because they're not really needed. I believe
they've been sorely needed, and people have just avoided them because
they required too much work to
Christian Marg wrote:
Hello,
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
[...]
Linked attributes include member/memberOf, master/masteredBy and many
others. They are defined in the AD schema, and as far as I know, are
strictly updated as a pair (they are not flattened memberOf listings,
for example).
[...]
Well, based on the discussion I am going to change toString() to
return an empty String (). I think its bad form for an instantiated
object to have 'null' for its string representation anyway.
Marc
I've sync'd it up with everything I'm aware of as being pending in
preparation for getting 2.4.7 out this week. Please test.
Thanks!
--Quanah
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
I've sync'd it up with everything I'm aware of as being pending in
preparation for getting 2.4.7 out this week. Please test.
Passes all tests on i386 (UP)
Cheers, p.
Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
OpenLDAP Core Team
SysNet s.r.l.
via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
quote who=Quanah Gibson-Mount
I've sync'd it up with everything I'm aware of as being pending in
preparation for getting 2.4.7 out this week. Please test.
Passes ok on F8 i386.
Thanks!
--Quanah
11 matches
Mail list logo
