type, making slapd
interpret the same data diffrently on different platforms?
--
Frode Nordahl
On 15. okt. 2006, at 18.52, matthew sporleder wrote:
On 10/15/06, Frode Nordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to use a slapd BDB database created on a 32-bit intel
system on a 64-bit (amd64/EMT64) system. Running slapcat on the
database works fine, but when the server is started
On 16. okt. 2006, at 00.01, Howard Chu wrote:
Frode Nordahl wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to use a slapd BDB database created on a 32-bit intel
system on a 64-bit (amd64/EMT64) system. Running slapcat on the
database works fine, but when the server is started, ldapsearch is
unable to find
start on the slave again.
I can probably evade this by using syncrepl instead?
--
Frode Nordahl
On 16. okt. 2006, at 00.15, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Sunday, October 15, 2006 7:52 PM +0200 Frode Nordahl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, this would be possible, but as the slapadd step may take
severalhours I cannot rely on this. I have tested it with slapadd -
q and
itstill takes
On 16. okt. 2006, at 12.08, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Monday 16 October 2006 09:56, Frode Nordahl wrote:
On 16. okt. 2006, at 03.08, matthew sporleder wrote:
I also have a large database (my slapcat-ed file is over 4gb), but I
don't see how it's more reliable to shutdown a spare for one hour
