Hi!
Do we have a plan to do a release or not?
4\/3!!
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
freddie_chopin wrote:
Do we have a plan to do a release or not?
Is it too urgent for you to wait until one or two features are done?
//Peter
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the
Is it too urgent for you to wait until one or two features are done?
It's not, but was it said that the release will be done after merging feature X
and Y? I don't recall the release being said to depend on any feature in the
queue by majority of this list members...
It's not urgent, but it's
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
freddie_chopin wrote:
Do we have a plan to do a release or not?
Is it too urgent for you to wait until one or two features are done?
What are the one or two features you have in your mind?
I guess one of them will be mpsse
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Freddie Chopin freddie_cho...@op.pl wrote:
W dniu 2012-05-19 04:32, Xiaofan Chen pisze:
I think it does not interfere with stlink. Andreas' patch does not
use the existing libusb-1.0 infrastructure which Peter Stuge
strongly dislike.
I had to add libusb-1.0
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:16 PM, freddie_chopin freddie_cho...@op.pl wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Andreas Fritiofson
I think Freddie's idea to use a different directory
name than ftdi is a good compromise.
It's done like that right now - the configs are in a separate directory.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Freddie Chopin freddie_cho...@op.pl wrote:
So is there any agreed schedule? Friday 18th of May?
Yes I would like to ask the same question. Maybe 18-May-2012
is already out.
I think the first question is how many of the open gerrit patch
will need to be
So is there any agreed schedule? Friday 18th of May?
4\/3!!
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can
Xiaofan Chen wrote:
Don't let the revert and/or fix hold off an unrelated patchset.
Stop repeating this.
Actually it is very important to repeat this, especially to you.
The reason it should not be repeated is because it is based on a
false assumption, a misunderstanding: I tried to be
John wrote:
I can confirm some remarks that even with a release version just
building OpenOCD from source can be, well let's say trying.
Please don't hesitate to be specific with issues you have had.
If there is some pushback then let that run off. I want building and
using OpenOCD to be easy.
Hi,
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:42:21AM +0100, John wrote:
source [find interface/arm-usb-ocd.cfg]
source [find target/stm32.cfg]
I meant that for me
./configure
make
did not work and I had to figure out lots of --things then hack various
makefiles etc to create anything at all.
Oh,
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Xiaofan Chen wrote:
Do not try to hold off OpenOCD release with your idea of a
perfect release.
There is very little perfect software in the world. I do however
think that it's reasonable to require every release be clearly
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 10:05:31AM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
John wrote:
I can confirm some remarks that even with a release version just
building OpenOCD from source can be, well let's say trying.
Please don't hesitate to be specific with issues you have had.
It's been months but IIRC it
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:59 PM, John j...@clip-4-win.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 10:05:31AM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
John wrote:
I can confirm some remarks that even with a release version just
building OpenOCD from source can be, well let's say trying.
Please don't hesitate to
Hi all,
I think it's time to do a new release
this friday the merge window close
Attention I'll close arround 8pm Shanghai Time
follwing by 4 weeks of rc
Best Regards,
J.
--
Live
A clarification about the rules while the merge window is closed:
Gerrit is open for new reviews at all times and we can even approve(+2),
but we can not submit reviews to the master branch while the merge window
is closed.
Jean-Christophe will announce when the merge window is open again at
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
I think it's time to do a new release
this friday the merge window close
Attention I'll close arround 8pm Shanghai Time
follwing by 4 weeks of rc
I disagree with this..
From Tuesday to Friday is simply not reasonable for the
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
I think it's time to do a new release
this friday the merge window close
Attention I'll close arround 8pm Shanghai Time
follwing by 4 weeks of rc
I disagree
Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
By 1. I do not mean that next release must support SWD, but I do mean
that openocd.git must have developed in an agreed-upon direction.
Simon and Tomek have both put a lot of effort into this and I want to
see some of that go into the release, even if there is
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Andreas Fritiofson
andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
I think it's time to do a new release
this friday the merge window close
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
I started a branch to clean it up, before I realized I needed the
async api which made it completely unusable anyway. I don't quite
understand the purpose of the abstraction, it's not very useful.
If
21 matches
Mail list logo
