Hi,
We are now testing Gerrit for use within OpenOCD.
A Gerrit server has been setup at the following url:
http://openocd.zylin.com/
To keep loading down on the server clone as usual:
git clone git://openocd.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/openocd/openocd for example
The change happens we want to
On 11 October 2011 13:40, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
We are now testing Gerrit for use within OpenOCD.
A Gerrit server has been setup at the following url:
http://openocd.zylin.com/
To keep loading down on the server clone as usual:
git clone
Spencer Oliver wrote:
One addition i forgot to mention.
Gerrit uses a Change-Id to track the change, thsi is generated client
side using a hook.
You will need to install this hook, we will look into a better solution
scp -p -P 29418 usern...@openocd.zylin.com:hooks/commit-msg .git/hooks/
Spencer Oliver wrote:
It is advised to keep each patch in its own branch.
I'll try to explain this a little.
If multiple commits are pushed, ie. if the branch being pushed has
more than one commit which is not in the main openocd.git repo, then
Gerrit will record that these commits form a chain
Spencer Oliver wrote:
git remote add review ssh://usern...@openocd.zylin.com:29418/openocd.git
git config remote.review.push HEAD:refs/for/master
When pushing, run:
git push review
Thanks to the remote.review.push setting this will push whatever is
currently checked out.
As always, use git
Hi Spen,
Why using a commercial server and a commercial url for an open source project?
Regards,
Laurent
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
Laurent Gauch wrote:
Why using a commercial server and a commercial url for an open
source project?
What is a commercial server?
A company has donated resources to the project for running Gerrit.
I don't think the URL that is used really matters. Do you? Really?
Perhaps you can focus on the
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote:
Why using a commercial server and a commercial url for an open source
project?
heh, like sourceforge.net, code.google.com, github.com or launchpad.net?
So that the open-source crowd can spend their valuable time on
producing free and
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Tormod Volden lists.tor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote:
Why using a commercial server and a commercial url for an open source
project?
heh, like sourceforge.net, code.google.com, github.com or launchpad.net?
So that
If someone wants to contribute a patch with documentation on how
to use gerrit, that would be most welcome!
--
Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434
http://www.zylin.com/
___
Openocd-development mailing
How do I push a patch series to gerrit?
Does gerrit have a concept of patch series or are all patches islands?
--
Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434
http://www.zylin.com/
___
Openocd-development
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:40:28PM +0100, Spencer Oliver wrote:
We are now testing Gerrit for use within OpenOCD.
Just a comment from a lurker. Is there any intent to integrate gerrit
back into the ML? See [1] for an existing gripe.
The main difference I see between gerrit and a mailinglist
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
How do I push a patch series to gerrit?
Put the commits in a branch rooted in the main openocd.git repo
master branch, then push that branch into refs/for/master in gerrit.
(With Spencer's default config you will push it if it is currently
checked out and you run git push
Hi Jason,
I do share your concern that we're loosing something when we're not
using the mailing list to discuss patches.
However, I certainly still welcome discussion of patches in the mailing list
prior to pushing them to Gerrit. In fact I think that if the entire
discussion was
in the mailing
Does gerrit have a concept of patch series or are all patches
islands?
If you push a series of commits to gerrit as per above then gerrit
will record dependency between the commits.
I did git am -s on two patches and tried using Spencer's config:
git push review
Counting objects: 16,
On 11/10/2011 20:54, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Hi Jason,
I do share your concern that we're loosing something when we're not
using the mailing list to discuss patches.
However, I certainly still welcome discussion of patches in the mailing list
prior to pushing them to Gerrit. In fact I think that
Ah gotit.
I need a unique id per patch, I thought the id had to be unique per series.
I thought that patches would be displayed as series within the same
patch id rather
than this depends on scheme.
--
Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434
+1
if there were to bo no more list, I will never more know what happens...
I simply don have the time to browse through Forums seekng out what
might have been going on :) :)
Alain
Em 11-10-2011 14:21, Jason escreveu:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:40:28PM +0100, Spencer Oliver wrote:
We are
18 matches
Mail list logo
