On 17 December 2011 16:49, Freddie Chopin freddie_cho...@op.pl wrote:
Hi!
From what I've read berlios has found some funding so it's going to operate,
but will the mailing lists be kept online?
Sourceforge deleted the list, there is an archive available, so what's so
hard in undeleting it?
On 15 December 2011 05:44, Dean Glazeski dngl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
Long time no see. Recently, I got a bug request through Red Hat bugs to
package the newer version of OpenOCD for Fedora. It's been a while, but it
finally kicked me in gear to take care of it (seeing as 0.5.0 was
On 15 December 2011 15:15, Akos Vandra axo...@gmail.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem mailer-dae...@googlemail.com
Date: 15 December 2011 16:14
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: axo...@gmail.com
Delivery to the following
On 2 December 2011 14:12, Laurent Gauch laurent.ga...@amontec.com wrote:
What do you mean by Senior developers ?
Developers bestowes us with their great acumen.
What do you really interpret At the sharp rise, Gerrit was introduced ?
# of commits rose from 3 to 30 a week.
I am really not
On 24 November 2011 08:28, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
Comments welcome!
https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dhftn35p_14s2xxcbt3
It was a good read during my lunch :-)
Spen
___
Openocd-development mailing list
On 16 November 2011 23:05, Whitlock, Bradley D
bradley.d.whitl...@lmco.com wrote:
I believe I have found the issue with one of the previous issues that I do
not believe has been solved yet (see below):
I thought the issue was resolved - it is for me anyway.
Are you building from git master or
Hi,
I have been waiting quite a while for sf to move the mailing list
archives/users - it is now done :)
Everybody that was subscribed to the old lists should be moved over to
the ones at sf.
This msg has been sent to both lists so that people can check the list
settings have moved over
On 2 November 2011 20:03, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
Should we?
i guess it makes sense, i will sort out and add a tools/scripts dir.
Spen
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
if we start tweaking perfectly good code and adding nonsense checks
just to get a clean scan-build output, I think that's a step
backwards in terms of code quality.
Yes, I agree. I'm not at all fond of throwing assert() at the clang
warnings.
+1 from me aswell.
Spen
Hi,
All patches submitted to gerrit will be verified using checkpatch.
Also just to give you insight on the jenkins setup:
http://openocd.zylin.com/jenkins/
we have a few jobs configured:
openocd - built whenever master branch changes.
openocd-gerrit - run whenever a change is sent to gerrit -
On 28 October 2011 15:21, Jonathan Dumaresq jdumar...@cimeq.qc.ca wrote:
HI,
I have create a change in one of my patch that i have already sent. I
commited it, but I forget to add the signed-off by... Is it possible to edit
a commit message ?
Jonathan
git commit -s --amend
Spen
On 27/10/2011 18:30, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Hi,
Spencer has gotten clang up and running again on the server! :-)
Please take a moment to fix a warning or two that you can find in the latest
warning list for clang builds.
You'll notice that there is a nice graph that we can use to track our
On 26 October 2011 13:35, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote:
Moin,
Would it possible to have gerrit comments as mails to the mailinglist
as well?
This is down to taste - some would class lots of gerrit emails spam.
My suggestion is to watch the openocd project in gerrit, enabling emails
On 27/10/2011 00:10, jim norris wrote:
I'm trying to do a 'git push review' and it just hangs.
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
try now
On 27/10/2011 00:13, jim norris wrote:
try now
Nope. Still hangs.
working fine this end, so unsure what to suggest
Spen
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
On Oct 25, 2011 8:34 AM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
Could someone take checkpatch for a spin and reporter back to the
list on if/how we should use in w/Gerrit+Jenkins review?
I think it is used client side.
Spen
___
with ref to subject commit ef885d3b2a3001325f525df250dadd570e5d743e
the files jim-nvp.[ch] have no copyright info.
Cheers
Spen
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
On 20 October 2011 17:04, Freddie Chopin freddie_cho...@op.pl wrote:
Hi!
The most recent OpenOCD behaves differently on Windows than 0.5.0 (and
before) and in my opinion the direction of change is to worse.
OpenOCD 0.5.0 could be run this way:
openocd -f interface/jtagkey.cfg -f
On 21 October 2011 12:40, freddie_chopin freddie_cho...@op.pl wrote:
W dniu 2011-10-21 13:06:05 użytkownik Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk
napisał:
i cannot reproduce this problem, any more details.
We'll... I've compiled master from yesterday, using the same tools and
libraries
On 20 October 2011 11:49, Uwe Hermann u...@hermann-uwe.de wrote:
Hi,
seems like the gitweb for OpenOCD is down? E.g. the links such as
http://openocd.zylin.com/gitweb/?p=openocd.git;a=commit;h=a756b1bcdffef34a6d60d7a2706da9574663f544
no longer work (they did yesterday). There are links from
On 20 October 2011 12:06, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
On 20 October 2011 11:49, Uwe Hermann u...@hermann-uwe.de wrote:
Hi,
seems like the gitweb for OpenOCD is down? E.g. the links such as
http://openocd.zylin.com/gitweb/?p=openocd.git;a=commit;h
On 18/10/2011 18:18, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Does anyone want to take clang static analyzer for a spin on openocd?
http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/scan-build.html
seems jenkins already has a plugin for that :)
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Clang+Scan-Build+Plugin
Spen
On 13 October 2011 20:47, Uwe Hermann u...@hermann-uwe.de wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 01:04:26PM +0300, Spencer Oliver (Code Review) wrote:
Spencer Oliver has submitted this change and it was merged.
Change subject: docs: update project url's
Spencer Oliver has uploaded a new change for review.
Change subject: arm-jtag-ew: whitespace cleanup
..
arm-jtag-ew: whitespace cleanup
Change-Id: I8861e825f9c84525e0c09c3adaa3fe300640770d
Signed-off-by: Spencer Oliver ntfr
Spencer Oliver has uploaded a new change for review.
Change subject: ICEPick-C: Add support for warm reset through JTAG controller
and provide finer detail functions.
..
ICEPick-C: Add support for warm reset through JTAG
Spencer Oliver has uploaded a new change for review.
Change subject: AM/DM37x: Use ICEPick warm reset and include halt when gdb
connects.
..
AM/DM37x: Use ICEPick warm reset and include halt when gdb connects.
Using
Spencer Oliver has uploaded a new change for review.
Change subject: flash: fix lpc2000 driver typo
..
flash: fix lpc2000 driver typo
Change-Id: I3a759ed98a27fd186c12355b846d5e97dba86c5b
Signed-off-by: Spencer Oliver s...@spen
On 13 October 2011 15:21, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
I checked on the http://openocd.sourceforge.net/doc//pdf/openocd.pdf. I did
a find on rtos keyword, and find nothing about this.
Perhaps that pdf is old, try openocd.texi from HEAD of master.
docs are generated weekly so
Spencer Oliver has uploaded a new change for review.
Change subject: target: whitespace cleanup
..
target: whitespace cleanup
Change-Id: I1453f4f3dc0add529da20577e38b8b82d7d00366
Signed-off-by: Spencer Oliver ntfr
Spencer Oliver has submitted this change and it was merged.
Change subject: docs: update project url's
..
docs: update project url's
Change-Id: I54fc3aff722ed25143aad85e58d19b72fcecbba0
Signed-off-by: Spencer Oliver ntfr
Hi,
We are now testing Gerrit for use within OpenOCD.
A Gerrit server has been setup at the following url:
http://openocd.zylin.com/
To keep loading down on the server clone as usual:
git clone git://openocd.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/openocd/openocd for example
The change happens we want to
On 11 October 2011 13:40, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
We are now testing Gerrit for use within OpenOCD.
A Gerrit server has been setup at the following url:
http://openocd.zylin.com/
To keep loading down on the server clone as usual:
git clone git
On 11/10/2011 20:54, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Hi Jason,
I do share your concern that we're loosing something when we're not
using the mailing list to discuss patches.
However, I certainly still welcome discussion of patches in the mailing list
prior to pushing them to Gerrit. In fact I think that
On Oct 6, 2011 10:01 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
I find gerrit intriguing as a way of managing patches.
Can I have a show of hands of contributors for/against/don't care/don't
know?
+1 from of :-)
Spen
___
Openocd-development
On 5 October 2011 12:20, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
Due to the recent news about Berlios closure on 31.12.2011 we are
moving the mailing list to sourceforge.
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo
Due to the recent news about Berlios closure on 31.12.2011 we are
moving the mailing list to sourceforge.
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/openocd-devel - was
http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/openocd-commit -
I agree - I will look into it, website aswell.
Spen
On Sep 30, 2011 6:47 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
FYI,
My first instinct is to move the mailing list wholesale to sourceforge.
-- Forwarded message --
From: ad...@berlios.de
Date: 2011/9/30
Subject:
On 16 August 2011 11:03, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote:
On 12/08/2011, at 11:12 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Olivier Schonken
olivier.schon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Xiaofan
In my
On 16 August 2011 11:42, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote:
On 16/08/2011, at 8:32 PM, Spencer Oliver wrote:
On 16 August 2011 11:13, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
On 16 August 2011 11:03, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote:
On 12/08/2011, at 11:12 PM, Xiaofan
On 15 August 2011 16:03, Jie Zhang jzhang...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
On 15 August 2011 14:22, Eric Wetzel thewet...@gmail.com wrote:
if test $cross_compiling = no; then
# guess-rev.sh only exists in the repository
On 15/08/2011 20:42, Jie Zhang wrote:
configure.ac is now preferred. So rename configure.in to make OpenOCD
project look modern.
Please review and merge if it's OK.
Thank you!
cheers, no objections then i will commit.
Spen
___
Openocd-development
On Aug 14, 2011 10:01 AM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Jie Zhang jzhang...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is probably because you have a very old version of MinGW
and MinGW Win32-API.
On 01/08/2011 10:05, Spencer Oliver wrote:
On 29 July 2011 22:23, Andreas Fritiofsonandreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
Another fix would be not trying to print the status as a numeric
value. We can print it as an error message, so we don't need to handle
this tricky situation. Like
On 11/08/2011 22:14, Jie Zhang wrote:
Anyone having a go at this - if not i may get a chance later on in the
week?
Cheers
Spen
I have merged a patch that should sort all these warnings out.
Thanks. But it's on your git tree, not on the public one, right?
it has been merged to openocd
On 10 August 2011 09:13, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
We *do* want all the personal commit logs they are crucial documentation
of the system.
I am in the rebase camp - i like the linear history.
rebase only really effects shared public repos - as our dev's tend to
use their
On 10 August 2011 07:11, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote:
On 10/08/2011, at 3:03 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au
wrote:
On 10/08/2011, at 9:43 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
It was not up to date but very close. Anyway, I
On 10 August 2011 11:15, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote:
On 10/08/2011, at 6:39 PM, Spencer Oliver wrote:
On 10 August 2011 07:11, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote:
On 10/08/2011, at 3:03 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Steve Bennett ste
On 10 August 2011 13:30, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
On 10 August 2011 11:15, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote:
for me jimtcl has never built under msys since the update.
log is attached below
On 10 August 2011 13:26, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
On 9 August 2011 16:01, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk
wrote:
Just tested
On 10/08/2011 14:41, Jie Zhang wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Xiaofan Chenxiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Spencer Olivers...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
Just tested building native windoze under cygwin and working fine here.
I used the release tarball and the
On 9 August 2011 10:31, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote:
On 07:50 Tue 09 Aug , Tomek CEDRO wrote:
Ugh, why this is a release not RC3? We did not test RC to have go for
a release... are we
On 9 August 2011 12:52, Vit Mares mares@gmail.com wrote:
Attempt to build 0.5.0 with MinGW on Windows XP failed when running configure.
Release 0.4.0 configured and built without problems.
config.status: creating src/pld/Makefile
config.status: creating doc/Makefile
config.status:
On 9 August 2011 13:48, Vit Mares mares@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Spen,
it doesn't seem so, jimsh0.exe is built during configure and is runable.
When I start it in MSYS console I get the dot prompt.
Best regards
Vit
It has been a while since i looked however:
Building jimsh0 is not the
On 9 August 2011 14:13, Jie Zhang jzhang...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Vit Mares mares@gmail.com wrote:
Attempt to build 0.5.0 with MinGW on Windows XP failed when running
configure.
Release 0.4.0 configured and built without problems.
I downloaded 0.5.0 and built
On 9 August 2011 14:34, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
On 9 August 2011 13:48, Vit Mares mares@gmail.com wrote:
it doesn't seem so, jimsh0.exe is built during configure and is runable.
When I start
On 9 August 2011 15:10, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
The issue
On 9 August 2011 16:01, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
Just tested building native windoze under cygwin and working fine here.
I used the release tarball and the following configure line:
./configure --build
On 9 August 2011 16:11, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
On 9 August 2011 16:01, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
Just tested building native windoze under cygwin and working fine here.
I used
On 09/08/2011 22:15, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Any objections?
I would like to give this a test-run tomorrow.
One observation - other targets that do not yet support the new
functions will output a LOG_ERROR to the user. Maybe this should be a
LOG_DEBUG as the user will have no idea what it
On 5 August 2011 07:56, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
When I run git describe now I get v0.4.0-973-g0d7a948 rather than
a v0.5.0-rc2-.
Is that intentional?
I think it's nice that we stick to v0.4.0- until v0.5.0- goes out
of the door.
I have no particular
On 5 August 2011 09:00, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
---
src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c | 14 +-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c b/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c
index 5c671cc..c6c5a50 100644
---
On 5 August 2011 04:38, Rodrigo Rosa rodrigorosa...@gmail.com wrote:
I submitted these patches a couple weeks ago, i guess everybody was
too busy with the release...
Could they be added?
Thanks!
Sorry should have replied to your original email - i have put them in
my patch todo list.
On 5 August 2011 09:58, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com
wrote:
When I run git describe now I get v0.4.0-973-g0d7a948 rather than
a v0.5.0-rc2-.
Is that intentional?
I think it's nice that we
On 5 August 2011 10:19, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk
wrote:
On 5 August 2011 09:58, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Øyvind Harboe
On 5 August 2011 10:26, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
On 5 August 2011 10:19, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk
wrote:
On 5 August 2011 09:58, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof
On 5 August 2011 10:39, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk
wrote:
Release tags are annotated, but not rc tags
Oh, but they are, or am I completely oblivious of git tags (quite possible)?
$ git
On 5 August 2011 11:07, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
And why shouldn't they be?
To me it's a matter of taste if rc candidate tags are annotated or not.
I'm good with either choice. I was just curious as to whether it was
accidental
or intentional.
Looks like it was
On 3 August 2011 11:28, Luca Bruno lu...@debian.org wrote:
Andreas Fritiofson scrisse:
make dist should use git2cl to genereate ChangeLog from git
history, populating the placeholder file in released tarball.
Still not working for srcdir != builddir
make[1]: Entering directory
On 3 August 2011 11:46, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
On 3 August 2011 11:28, Luca Bruno lu...@debian.org wrote:
Andreas Fritiofson scrisse:
make dist should use git2cl to genereate ChangeLog from git
history, populating the placeholder file in released tarball.
Still
On 3 August 2011 15:00, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Luca Bruno lu...@debian.org wrote:
Andreas Fritiofson scrisse:
make dist should use git2cl to genereate ChangeLog from git
history, populating the placeholder file in
On 2 August 2011 03:05, B bbcu2...@gmail.com wrote:
My apologizes I left an extraneous word on a comment line that shouldn't
have been in the patch.
Here is the same patch, without the needless word.
Brian
changed wording to DEVICECLASS and committed.
Cheers
Spen
On 29 July 2011 22:23, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
Another fix would be not trying to print the status as a numeric
value. We can print it as an error message, so we don't need to handle
this tricky situation. Like
LOG_ERROR(FT_Write failed:%s\n,
On 30 July 2011 22:48, B bbcu2...@gmail.com wrote:
Using Open On-Chip Debugger 0.5.0-dev-00948-gd4cd6f0 (2011-07-30-15:55)
LM3S3N26-C5 is not detected as a Tempest device and so uses the sysresetreq
in place of the needed vectreset in stellaris.cfg.
The device class appears to be set by:
On 29 July 2011 16:54, Jie Zhang jzhang...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
On 29 July 2011 15:32, Jie Zhang jzhang...@gmail.com wrote:
I happened to find that two previous fixes for set-but-not-used
warnings are not correct
-off-by: Spencer Oliver ntfr...@users.sourceforge.net
---
src/target/etb.c | 12
src/target/smp.c |9 +
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/target/etb.c b/src/target/etb.c
index 3cb2254..974ab2b 100644
--- a/src/target/etb.c
+++ b/src
On 29 July 2011 02:01, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote:
I don't know what parameters may be passed to these procs, but if they could
contain
spaces, quotes or braces this could cause unexpected behaviour.
You might consider using the more correct form:
proc stm32f2xxx args {
On 29 July 2011 11:45, Jie Zhang jzhang...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
OpenOCD uses script command to execute config file passed through -f
option. script command is defined as a function
proc script {filename} {
source [find $filename]
}
Thus when executing the config file, global
On 29 July 2011 14:54, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk
wrote:
delete mode 100644 tcl/target/stm32.cfg
delete mode 100644 tcl/target/stm32f2xxx.cfg
see patch 4
Spen
On 29 July 2011 15:43, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
That one won't help for all scripts out there that are currently sourcing
target/stm32.cfg.
/Andreas
Good point - how about
http://repo.or.cz/w/openocd/ntfreak.git/commit/e4908b71bcac1e3ae01a4f54cffe475b0be6e336
On 29 July 2011 16:56, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk
wrote:
On 29 July 2011 15:43, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
wrote:
That one won't help for all scripts out
From: Spencer Oliver ntfr...@users.sourceforge.net
Signed-off-by: Spencer Oliver ntfr...@users.sourceforge.net
---
tcl/board/hitex_stm32-performancestick.cfg |2 +-
tcl/board/olimex_stm32_h103.cfg|2 +-
tcl/board/olimex_stm32_h107.cfg|2 +-
tcl/board
From: Spencer Oliver ntfr...@users.sourceforge.net
Issue warning when the old cmd is used and redirect to new supported one.
These deprecated cmds will be removed at some point.
Signed-off-by: Spencer Oliver ntfr...@users.sourceforge.net
---
src/flash/startup.tcl | 11 +++
1 files
From: Spencer Oliver ntfr...@users.sourceforge.net
Signed-off-by: Spencer Oliver ntfr...@users.sourceforge.net
---
doc/openocd.texi | 29 ++---
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/openocd.texi b/doc/openocd.texi
index dfb8e30..069367d
On 28 July 2011 13:41, Laurent Charpentier laurent_p...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Spencer,
Idea is to bring the stm32 flash drivers inline with their
actual names, eg.
stm32x to stm32f1x
stm32f2xxx to stm32f2x
This is a good idea to clean that up.
I think you can go one step further by dropping
On 27 July 2011 00:49, Matthew Lai cyberf...@wecheer.com wrote:
Hello!
I just started working with a custom PCB STM32F2, and while I got most
things to work (including flash and verify), OpenOCD seems to detect the
size of flash on my chip wrong.
OpenOCD (poll) reports 1024KB, when the chip
Hi,
Idea is to bring the stm32 flash drivers inline with their actual names, eg.
stm32x to stm32f1x
stm32f2xxx to stm32f2x
This is also getting ready for the new stm32f4x family
Any comments?
Cheers
Spen
___
Openocd-development mailing list
On 12 July 2011 15:01, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
Try my repo now i have pushed a fix for the warnings.
I have just attempted to build under cygwin and get warnings.
Seems this patch has broken windows - i
On 21/07/2011 19:30, Ronny Strutz wrote:
Hi,
i've ported the fm3 port by Marc Willam to current git.
Feel free to apply.
committed to master
Cheers
Spen
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
On 21/07/2011 16:40, Jie Zhang wrote:
The subject explains this patch.
Jie
committed.
Cheers
Spen
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On 21/07/2011 16:22, Jie Zhang wrote:
The commit log explains this patch.
Jie
committed.
Cheers
Spen
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On Jul 24, 2011 8:54 PM, Peter Horn peter.h...@bluewin.ch wrote:
Hi Tomek
Without taking exact measurements, my impression is that the RLink
performs about the same with RIDE on Windows and OpenOCD on Linux. FWIW
RLink uses the Jungo driver on Windows.
Just for info - Jungo is used on winxp
On 21 July 2011 11:18, Igor Skochinsky skochin...@mail.ru wrote:
Hello Julius,
Thursday, July 21, 2011, 11:48:17 AM, you wrote:
JB I'm looking at adding OpenRISC 1000 support to OpenOCD.
[skip]
JB One solution is we make our GDB port not use these remote query
JB commands and instead rely
On 21/07/2011 19:30, Ronny Strutz wrote:
Hi,
i've ported the fm3 port by Marc Willam to current git.
Feel free to apply.
As this has no impact on existing functionality i would like to commit
this before 0.5 - objections?
Cheers
Spen
___
On 20 July 2011 08:47, Simon Barner bar...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I can see one change that the referred commit introduced
to the ARM-JTAG-EW driver. It is that a speed setting in
the init script now actually is executed. Any such setting
was previously silently ignored.
Do you mean the
On 19 July 2011 03:41, Brian Hutchinson b.hutch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm not quite sure if my gdb is hosed up or if it is my openocd build.
OpenOCD version is Open On-Chip Debugger
0.5.0-dev-00959-gd6c42bf-dirty (2011-07-18-18:35)
Is there anything special that needs to be done to build
On 18 July 2011 00:46, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote:
If there is no way to make automake do this then I guess we have no choice.
I have pushed something similar to git.
Thanks for doing this, i have tested your changes and are just what we need :)
I am going to push the openocd
On 17 July 2011 10:18, Luca Bruno lu...@debian.org wrote:
make dist should use git2cl to genereate ChangeLog from git history,
populating the placeholder file in released tarball.
Still not working for srcdir != builddir
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/soliver/openocd/openocd-rel'
if test
On 18 July 2011 11:13, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch set fixes some general problems in the RLink interface driver.
Most importantly it fixes a performance bug that have been causing decreased
throughput.
Speed test on a STM32 Primer (STM32F103 platform
On Jul 15, 2011 3:39 PM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
Historical reference back in June 2009.
Under Linux, Dominic found no much difference between libftdi and ftd2xx.
https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-June/008846.html
My test results support this
On 14 July 2011 10:05, Luca Bruno lu...@debian.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD scrisse:
But these are not really a real release, created by make dist.
Surely we should be running make dist then uploading the releases to
1 - 100 of 588 matches
Mail list logo
