Peter,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 01:21:44PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
Jason wrote:
Is there any intent to integrate gerrit back into the ML?
Sending email is easy. Receiving and parsing email is not as easy.
Agreed, I've been thinking through the obstacles, from a submitter pov,
and I've
-Original Message-
From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:openocd-
development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Jason
...
1.) Threading versions of a patch series together. So, when the
maintainer has a chance to look at the thread, he/she can just go
Alex,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 04:04:21PM -0500, Austin, Alex wrote:
-Original Message-
From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:openocd-
development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Jason
...
1.) Threading versions of a patch series together. So,
Jason wrote:
1.) Threading versions of a patch series together.
I think Gerrit already does this. Did you try it?
//Peter
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
Hi Jean-Christophe,
the whole point of Gerrit is that the contributors can manage patches instead
of the maintainers.
We even want/plan to have automated checks on checkpatch.pl and
building the patch checking for warnings so maintainers can ignore patches
that don't pass those tests.
The
Jason wrote:
Is there any intent to integrate gerrit back into the ML?
Sending email is easy. Receiving and parsing email is not as easy.
Thus anything actually worth calling integration takes a fair bit of
work.
See [1] for an existing gripe.
I'm the Peter refered to there. I also like to
Hi,
how about using patchwoek simply as done for the kernel ML?
Best Regards,
J.
On 13:40 Tue 11 Oct , Spencer Oliver wrote:
Hi,
We are now testing Gerrit for use within OpenOCD.
A Gerrit server has been setup at the following url:
http://openocd.zylin.com/
To keep loading
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
how about using patchwoek simply as done for the kernel ML?
One significant benefit of Gerrit is that it integrates really well
with git. Gerrit takes input from git, and output from Gerrit goes to
git. This helps everyone who is working with the code.
On 19:31 Wed 12 Oct , Peter Stuge wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
how about using patchwoek simply as done for the kernel ML?
One significant benefit of Gerrit is that it integrates really well
with git. Gerrit takes input from git, and output from Gerrit goes to
git.
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
how about using patchwoek simply as done for the kernel ML?
One significant benefit of Gerrit is that it integrates really
well with git. Gerrit takes input from git, and output from
Gerrit goes to git.
..
I prefer to manage git by myself
Hi,
We are now testing Gerrit for use within OpenOCD.
A Gerrit server has been setup at the following url:
http://openocd.zylin.com/
To keep loading down on the server clone as usual:
git clone git://openocd.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/openocd/openocd for example
The change happens we want to
On 11 October 2011 13:40, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
We are now testing Gerrit for use within OpenOCD.
A Gerrit server has been setup at the following url:
http://openocd.zylin.com/
To keep loading down on the server clone as usual:
git clone
Spencer Oliver wrote:
One addition i forgot to mention.
Gerrit uses a Change-Id to track the change, thsi is generated client
side using a hook.
You will need to install this hook, we will look into a better solution
scp -p -P 29418 usern...@openocd.zylin.com:hooks/commit-msg .git/hooks/
Spencer Oliver wrote:
It is advised to keep each patch in its own branch.
I'll try to explain this a little.
If multiple commits are pushed, ie. if the branch being pushed has
more than one commit which is not in the main openocd.git repo, then
Gerrit will record that these commits form a chain
Spencer Oliver wrote:
git remote add review ssh://usern...@openocd.zylin.com:29418/openocd.git
git config remote.review.push HEAD:refs/for/master
When pushing, run:
git push review
Thanks to the remote.review.push setting this will push whatever is
currently checked out.
As always, use git
Hi Spen,
Why using a commercial server and a commercial url for an open source project?
Regards,
Laurent
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
Laurent Gauch wrote:
Why using a commercial server and a commercial url for an open
source project?
What is a commercial server?
A company has donated resources to the project for running Gerrit.
I don't think the URL that is used really matters. Do you? Really?
Perhaps you can focus on the
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote:
Why using a commercial server and a commercial url for an open source
project?
heh, like sourceforge.net, code.google.com, github.com or launchpad.net?
So that the open-source crowd can spend their valuable time on
producing free and
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Tormod Volden lists.tor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote:
Why using a commercial server and a commercial url for an open source
project?
heh, like sourceforge.net, code.google.com, github.com or launchpad.net?
So that
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:40:28PM +0100, Spencer Oliver wrote:
We are now testing Gerrit for use within OpenOCD.
Just a comment from a lurker. Is there any intent to integrate gerrit
back into the ML? See [1] for an existing gripe.
The main difference I see between gerrit and a mailinglist
Hi Jason,
I do share your concern that we're loosing something when we're not
using the mailing list to discuss patches.
However, I certainly still welcome discussion of patches in the mailing list
prior to pushing them to Gerrit. In fact I think that if the entire
discussion was
in the mailing
On 11/10/2011 20:54, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Hi Jason,
I do share your concern that we're loosing something when we're not
using the mailing list to discuss patches.
However, I certainly still welcome discussion of patches in the mailing list
prior to pushing them to Gerrit. In fact I think that
+1
if there were to bo no more list, I will never more know what happens...
I simply don have the time to browse through Forums seekng out what
might have been going on :) :)
Alain
Em 11-10-2011 14:21, Jason escreveu:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:40:28PM +0100, Spencer Oliver wrote:
We are
23 matches
Mail list logo