Post 0.4 release, I'd like to see patches being merged
in ascending order of disruptiveness.
Of course it isn't possible to measure disruptiveness, but
I think about two things: cherry pickability and impact on
design and direction of openocd.
This makes patches more cherry pickable(create some
Version in use: v0.4.0-rc1-194-gf7a6e62
Configuration: ./configure --enable-maintainer-mode --enable-jlink
--enable-ft2232_libftdi --enable-usb_blaster_libftdi --enable-amtjtagaccel
CFLAGS=-O0\ -g3
Config file:
source [find interface/axm0432.cfg]
set CPUTAPID 0x01c0001d
source [find
On Saturday 13 February 2010, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Post 0.4 release, I'd like to see patches being merged
in ascending order of disruptiveness.
Of course it isn't possible to measure disruptiveness, but
I think about two things: cherry pickability and impact on
design and direction of
On Saturday 13 February 2010, Austin, Alex wrote:
openocd segfaults upon connecting to it. I've tracked it down to
target_get_gdb_reg_list being called when target-type-get_gdb_reg_list
is null. Tracing back to where the target-type comes from, it never
gets set in dsp563xx.c, so is null. Why
On Tuesday 09 February 2010, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
This allows minidrivers to e.g. hardware accelerate memory
writes.
Same trick as is used for arm7/9 dcc writes.
Added error propagation for memory transfer failures in
code rearrangement.
These would be a *lot* better as method pointers
On Thursday 11 February 2010, hp...@space.aau.dk wrote:
Yes. Here is the patch and the new cfg used to test (almost just a
copy of the one for mega128)
Thanks ... we'll hold this until the 0.5 merge window opens,
since the 0.4 series has been feature-frozen for some time now.
- Dave
Hello world! :-)
I finally got for better testing if 0.4.0-RC1, there are no big issues
as for now, however I have some remarks:
-It is better to name package openocd-0.4.0rc1.tar.gz than
openocd-0.4.0-rc1.tar.gz, as there are some other system conventions
that forbids using - and _ mark after
Git has an RC2 tag, and when you autoreconfig it comes out as RC2.
Source archives are downloadable from SourceForge, and its news has
a brief blurb.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openocd/
Berlios downloads are in the works. (They take forever to do, since
Berlios uses such an
On Saturday 13 February 2010, CeDeROM wrote:
Hello world! :-)
I finally got for better testing if 0.4.0-RC1, there are no big issues
as for now, however I have some remarks:
Good ... can you let us know if RC2 has any significant deltas from
this list?
-It is better to name package
Hello David!
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:11 AM, David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net wrote:
I finally got for better testing if 0.4.0-RC1, there are no big issues
as for now, however I have some remarks:
Good ... can you let us know if RC2 has any significant deltas from
this list?
Sure thing!
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 8:11 AM, David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net wrote:
FreeBSD does have parport support though, right? Is the issuse that
it doesn't work at all with OpenOCD? Or instead, that it can work
given some changes?
Yes but the API is different from Linux. xBSD uses ppbus.
Hello Xiao! :-)
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
(...)
But I have not used FreeBSD for a while. It did not boot on my desktop
PC (Nvidia 620i/Geforce 7050 integrated chipset) when I wanted to try it
last time. It also had quite bad USB support last
On Saturday 13 February 2010, CeDeROM wrote:
Hello Xiao! :-)
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
(...)
But I have not used FreeBSD for a while. It did not boot on my desktop
PC (Nvidia 620i/Geforce 7050 integrated chipset) when I wanted to try it
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 9:04 AM, David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net wrote:
So Xiaofan, I encourage you to give it a try! :-)
Probably I will try it later, maybe with a Live CD first to see if it boots.
Last time I spent sometime to get USB things working under FreeBSD.
Hey all,
I've posted the source RPM and builds for Fedora 11 and 12 for OpenOCD
0.4.0-RC2 on my Fedora people page. (http://dnglaze.fedoraproject.org).
Give the RPMs a spin if you are running Fedora. I'll post my own results a
bit later this evening.
--
// Dean Glazeski
The GDB in question is the gdb56300.exe provided by freescale, running
under WINE. I had the source for it at one time, but I've somehow managed
to misplace it.
From: David Brownell [davi...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 5:52 AM
To:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 9:04 AM, David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net wrote:
So Xiaofan, I encourage you to give it a try! :-)
Probably I will try it later, maybe with a Live CD first to see if it boots.
Last time I spent
On Saturday 13 February 2010, Austin, Alex wrote:
The GDB in question is the gdb56300.exe provided by freescale, running
under WINE. I had the source for it at one time, but I've somehow managed
to misplace it.
Yeah, that's what you'd want to have OpenOCD work with.
If it's not
18 matches
Mail list logo
