ger...@openocd.zylin.com wrote:
-DumpTargets:
+DumpTargets:;
Hm?
//Peter
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
2011/10/28 Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se:
ger...@openocd.zylin.com wrote:
-DumpTargets:
+DumpTargets:;
Hm?
Syntactically a declaration can't follow a label, so add an empty statement.
--
Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
2011/10/28 Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se:
ger...@openocd.zylin.com wrote:
-DumpTargets:
+DumpTargets:;
Hm?
Syntactically a declaration can't follow a label, so add an empty
statement.
I don't like the change so much. It ends up declaring the exact same
variable
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
2011/10/28 Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se:
ger...@openocd.zylin.com wrote:
-DumpTargets:
+DumpTargets:;
Hm?
Syntactically a declaration can't follow a label, so add an empty
statement.
I don't
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
I don't like the change so much. It ends up declaring the exact same
variable twice, and other odd noise, to silence a warning. Is there
no better way?
Reusing the 'target' variable name here is bad.
..
The code is now more easily re-factored as multiple functions
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
I don't like the change so much. It ends up declaring the exact same
variable twice, and other odd noise, to silence a warning. Is there
no better way?
Reusing the 'target' variable name here is bad.
