On Sep 30, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Kesick, Nicholas Charles wrote:
It seems you know very little about Windows Server operations, and who’s to
say Microsoft would come in and change all of the underlying OSes?
I wouldn’t recommend runing LINUX with Opensim on anything less than 4GB
(production),
On 9/30/2010 3:45 PM, Kesick, Nicholas Charles wrote:
It seems you know very little about Windows Server operations, and
who's to say Microsoft would come in and change all of the underlying
OSes?
I wouldn't recommend runing LINUX with Opensim on anything less than
4GB (production), and
Hi,
Is there anyone who uses, or works with, the Sirikata ClientView in
OpenSim? That code is likely nonfunctional in the core version and
responsible for a huge number of warnings.
If there are no users, we should remove it.
Melanie
___
Opensim-dev
+1 on removal, I cant imagine anyone is actually using it, I don't think its
ever worked or been complete enough for anyone to use with Sirikata, it
gives 100's of the current warnings when you compile opensim, i suspect its
mostly just incomplete stubs.
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Melanie
I'd like to see one skeleton client stack stay in core as it makes it a lot
easier to start a new one rather than studying the LL stack and helps 3rd
party client stack developers track changes in the IClientAPI interface.
MXPClientView is useful for this but I'm not sure it still works as
it
Another option is we can remove the CLS Compliant attributes..or add one
to the assembly and disable the event nonusage warning.
Teravus
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Dahlia Trimble dahliatrim...@gmail.comwrote:
I'd like to see one skeleton client stack stay in core as it makes it a lot
Were you running 0.6.9 or one of the more recent builds? My experience is
that 0.6.9 has a limit of around 50 while 0.7.x can support many more active
avatars. I've run hundreds of very active avatars with baking and constant
motion on 0.7.x servers.
-- mb
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:34 PM,
