On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Patrick Ale wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Ghee Teo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick Ale wrote:
Hi,
I get random kernel panics when running SXCE 95 with the 64 bit
kernel. The panics seem to have to do with reads/writes to disk.
I can reproduce the panics
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Siegfried Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
thanks for your ideas.
Normally my transfer of one byte needs about 3 - 4 microseconds (i have
mentioned). Sometimes we need up to 50 - 80 microseconds for one byte.
So i think other threads or processes gets the cpu and my driver was
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Darren Archibald wrote:
Has anyone encountered any issues with the 'ps -ef' command running really
slow on a non-global zone ? Th ecommand runs instantly on the global zone,
but takes around 1 minute to show all running proccesses on the local zone?
Obviously need to do
On Sat, 5 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Siegfried Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
I have written a driver for a special PCI Card on Solaris 10, Dual Core 2,4
GHz.
The application uses the driver via ioctl to get one byte from the PCI Card.
I
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Manish Chakravarty wrote:
Please mark such posts [OT]
Indeed, not quite sure whether legal code and computer code are
related. It's a case for -advocacy mailing lists, I guess.
But even then, the Roman law is far from the first one made public. There
are things more than
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Siegfried Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
I have written a driver for a special PCI Card on Solaris 10, Dual Core 2,4
GHz.
The application uses the driver via ioctl to get one byte from the PCI Card.
I use ddi_getxx to read the registers of the PCI Card, locked with mutex_enter
and
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Kristian Rink wrote:
Folks;
another migration-related question: I do have a fairly well sized USB
drive to hold data so far to share between Linux, Windows and
OpenSolaris, thus the lowest common denominator (in terms of file
systems) being FAT32. Taken into account I
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, takafumi ashiba wrote:
The filesync command has a maximum recursion depth of 20 levels
.#*define* MAX_DEPTH 20 /* how deep to recurse */
But, my file server's depth is 30~40 levels.
So anyone change max_depth?
I would like to be abe to change the depth
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, takafumi ashiba wrote:
Hi FrankH,
because it's there,
Where is rsync in opensolaris ?
I searched in /onnv/onnv-gate/usr, but I can't find rsync source.
Not in the ON tree, but in SFW. See:
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/sfw/usr/src/cmd/rsync/rsync-2.6.9/
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, takafumi ashiba wrote:
Thanks FrankH,
I hope rsync to move from SFW to ON.
joyce200
May I ask why is it important / relevant where the rsync sourcecode is
maintained ?
SFW, ON, X11, ... - all source repositories, all parts of OpenSolaris.
There should be no difference
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Emmanuel De Paepe wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cdrw
bash: cdrw: command not found
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# echo $PATH
/usr/gnu/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sfw/bin
Why is this not working?
$ pkginfo -l SUNWcdrw
PKGINST: SUNWcdrw
Hi Kyle,
given that what happens looks ever-so-slightly different each time, a
hardware glitch could be possible; to exclude this, would you happen to
know whether these panics occurred before build 78 as well ? If they occur
if you use the b77 hsfs module on your post-b78 system ? Does the
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Robert William Fuller wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kyle,
given that what happens looks ever-so-slightly different each time, a
hardware glitch could be possible; to exclude this, would you happen to
know whether these panics occurred before build 78 as well ?
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Juergen Keil wrote:
Robert William Fuller wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kyle,
given that what happens looks ever-so-slightly different each time, a
hardware glitch could be possible; to exclude this, would you happen to
know whether these panics occurred before
On Thu, 22 May 2008, Jan Friedel wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 06:00:35AM -0700, elflord woods wrote:
hi all
i have a toshiba laptop
i have two hard disk. used to install linux and disk2 i use for backup files
how can i see all the disks on my system ?
and how should i go about to mount
On Tue, 20 May 2008, NiuLin wrote:
Hello everyone:
When I am programming a kernel module for Solaris, I encountered one
problem: I cannot get the the absolute path for the current working
directory of the current process.
In user space, we can do this by calling getcwd(), but this function
On Tue, 20 May 2008, NiuLin wrote:
Thanks a lot for your quick reply! Actually, I have found this code already,
but as I know, dogetcwd is not exported by the kernel (not found in the
include files). How can I call this function?
#include /sys/pathname.h
for vnodetopath().
FrankH.
On Tue, 20 May 2008, NiuLin wrote:
Thanks!
I'm sorry I have missed some information in my original post, I'm writing
the module for Solaris 8, I checked the header files of Solaris 8 but
cannot find vnodetopath. Which function can I use on Solaris 8?
Please ask Sun Developer support for S8,
On Tue, 20 May 2008, Roberto carabajal wrote:
Hello:
I am new to OpenSolaris.Please, I apologize if my questions are too primitive
for advanced users.
Before hearing about OpenSolatis I had the idea to use 16 surplus Sun Sparc
10 Stations to implement a Mosix cluster. I would appreciate
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Joerg Schilling wrote:
andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think ZFS being added to Linux will mean Solaris loses an advantage. I
think it was probably inevitable that Sun would want ZFS to get the maximum
possible distribution across different operating systems.
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Milan Cermak wrote:
Hi Steve.
steve wrote:
Question 1: I have been searching for information as to weather open solaris
will install to a native linux partition, or ext2 file system?
Reason is so i can setup to read/write from either linux or solaris.
As is, i have only
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Milan Cermak wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Milan Cermak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the other hand, Linux understands OpenSolaris partition scheme and
ufs file system. It can also be made to understand zfs through fuse.
Linux does not support UFS.
Linux may have
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Mike DeMarco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone gotten Virtual box up and running?
I have installed the package, but if I try to run it
I get:
VirtualBox -help
Usage: basename string [ suffix ]
Unknown
On Wed, 7 May 2008, xulari wrote:
hi ,rlhamil : i can dtrace the syscall open, and i come to here :
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/fs/vnode.c#fop_lookup
how we get ufs_lookup or #fs_lookup by fop_lookup?
int line 3293 : it just call a function
On Sun, 4 May 2008, leno wrote:
mv /export/home/us/oldfile /export/home/us/newfile
but rename(2) never update cache path. v_path = /export/home/us/oldfile.
help me...,how about update caceh path?
Why do you need that ?
v_path is _NOT_ the cached path used for name lookups via system call.
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Grigoris Beis wrote:
Hello everyone,
Is there a way to filter out the pstack command so that it does not print
the stack output of every thread of my multithreaded application but only of
the one thread that crashes every time?
For instance, if thread#1 is the one
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
Why used second class information from HAL while cdrecord gives you complete
and correct information?
As always, you are absolutely right, Joerg!
It's a bit like a politician's answer to a journalist:
After the election, are you going
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Gorky Hasseldorf wrote:
Thanks frankho for the reply.
It seems this is a difficult task for the moment and people are working on it.
I will be in trouble to install it on a logical partition.
On this computer, Mandriva 2007, FC6, Windows XP and open SuSE 10.2 work
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Gorky Hasseldorf wrote:
Is it possible to install opensolaris on a logical partition?
The real Solaris needs a primary partition.
I have space to install on a logical partition.
Please tell me.
If you say this is possible, I will download and install it.
Depends on
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Pradeepg wrote:
Is it possible to implement page mechanism in Network drivers
for allocating DMA buffers ( instead of using ddi functions to
allocate DMA buffers) .
Is there any sample driver which implemented this in opensource.
Thanks in Advance
Ramya.
Hi Rayma,
why
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, ChaoHong Guo wrote:
Joerg Schilling 写道:
Bruno Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
I have a USB pen drive, formatted with FAT32.
It is working with correct speed under linux, windows, freebsd.
I mean I can copy to and from files.
In the contrary, it is VERY slow on
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Jürgen Keil wrote:
the pcfs driver (fat32 implementation in solaris) is
severly limited in its speed, it gives a maximum
speed of ~3mb/s, so don't expect to have higher
speeds...
True, but...
1 Gbyte in 90 minutes is less than 200 kbytes / second.
Very fragmented file ?
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, amit yadav wrote:
Hi,
I've installed Solaris 10 OS patch cluster even then I see the issue i.e. my
system is getting hang once I stop my application.
Machine info is given below;
(root)# uname -a
SunOS 5.10 Generic_120011-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,Netra-210
This forum is
Hi Dennis,
Best would be not only to boot kmdb, but also to use the -ad boot
options to have kmdb prompt you.
When unix/genunix is loaded, set kmem_flags to 0xf via
kmem_flags/W f
That'll allow better diagnosis, see the memory debugging section of the
modular debugger guide.
Bye,
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Dennis Clarke wrote:
[ ... ]
Hi Dennis,
Best would be not only to boot kmdb, but also to use the -ad boot
options to have kmdb prompt you.
I must recall how to do that. I think one must simple edit the GRUB menu.lst
entry and specify -kad -B console=ttya or something
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
[ ... ]
Calling lwp_create from a kernel driver will get you
into trouble. Why
would you want to create an LWP from within a kernel
driver ?
My present code uses thread_create(). I am seeing kernel panics due to an
ASSERT fail in the
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ... ]
My present code uses thread_create(). I am seeing kernel panics due to an
ASSERT fail in the sfmmu_tsbmiss_exception().
Can you please post the part of the output of ::msgbuf (from
mdb on your crashdump) following the panic[cpu...] line
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, ramana polamarasetti wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone tell me what are all the differences between the threads created
with thread_create() and those created with lwp_create()?
And is there any way to get an lwp, but using thread_create()?
Thanks for any help,
Ramana
Where do
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
This has little to do with OpenSolaris, however, having posted this question
on forums.sun.com it was suggested to post the issue here.
Sun T3 (and 61xx) series storage arrays can be upgraded with any Fibre
Channel or FATA drive sizes, however
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
-Aubrey
Intel OpenSolaris Team
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
What does Intel OpenSolaris Team mean? (Reason I'm asking is that Solaris
seems to be better
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Vamsee Priya wrote:
Hi All,
I have a kernel module which panics at 2 different places with the
following pani message :
trap data type: 0x31 (data access MMU miss)
When does this kind of a trap occur actually?
Under the same circumstances when you get SIGSEGV or
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, kanishk wrote:
Thank you.
I needed some information on what kind of Exceptions can be on the Kernel and
Filesystem in Solaris and how to restore them.
We're going circles ?
What do you mean by exception ? Please give examples.
FrankH.
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, kanishk wrote:
hi,
Can you let me know Exceptions in Solaris kernel and filesystem and how to
restore them
With the question phrased as broadly as that, I'd recommend:
Have a backup ready.
Can you please clarify what you mean by exceptions, and what sort of
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not impossible at all. Merely improbable. Even with current
techniques. So improbable because ( 2^128 - 1 ) =
340282366920938463463374607431768211455 is a staggeringly large number. Even
Mathematica takes a pause to factor a number that
Hi Stefano,
You've found a new bug ...
The foldcase mount option, as explained in the manpage mount_pcfs(1m),
should return all filenames as uppercase only.
You find that it does not do that for the directory names, in fact it
seems to do the reverse there.
But in any case, foldcase is not
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Vamsee Priya wrote:
Hi All,
We have a kernel module called IPFS which lies in between VFS and UFS.
We are getting a kernel panic (with the following stack trace) very
frequently on ATCA blades where as the panic is almost rare on CPCI
blades.
Hi Vamsee,
Are you
Hi Stefano,
these are known.
a) case wrong is actually not a bug. Solaris shows you what's
really stored on the medium.
Windows and Linux, by default, print filenames in lowercase even
if they're actually stored in uppercase on disk (which they will be
for names that fit into
Try to run this on OpenSolaris, not on something older.
The advantages are:
- the failure mode below doesn't exist in OpenSolaris
(check the code - you won't find that ufs_fault call anymore)
- you can DTrace on function arguments easily (ok, that's on
S10 as
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007, Vamsee Priya wrote:
Hi
I have tried LD_PRELOAD and UMEM_DEBUG with my program on Sparc.
Everything worked. I also am unable to find any bug in my program.
No clue as to who is the culprit..
Are you willing to share the coredump, and/or the application sourcecode
(for
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Vamsee Priya wrote:
Hi
Apart from the scenario I explained below, I also get a SIGABRT with the
following stack trace
This is libumem catching a memory error (either a double free or a heap
overrun). On this coredump, what'S the output of ::umem_status when you
load
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Vamsee Priya wrote:
Hi,
From the umem_status I too agree that some thing in my program corrupted
the memory. I am working on as to what caused the problem. The same
program works fine always in SPARC platform. Why is it that it is
causing problems on x86 architecture
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Vamsee Priya wrote:
Hi
I thought that the bug might be in my program. But everything works fine
with 64 bit binaryare there any flags that need to be set/unset
while compling?
And I reiterate that things worked fine some times with the 32 bit
binary also
I'd
This is:
6367349 Panic on port_remove_event_doneq
which has been fixed in OpenSolaris about 1 1/2 years ago.
Since you're on Solaris 10, any rev released in 2007 has the patch for
this integrated.
For more details on S10 patch details or when/how fixed in S10, ask the
usual support channels
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I don't find a core dump generated when a SIGSEGV is received. I set the
LD_PRELOAD variable to watchmalloc.so.1 but could not find the actual
place of seg. fault as the core dump file is not generated. (I got the
stack trace I pasted when I
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Minskey Guo wrote:
On 2007-12-22, at 下午9:17, 陶捷 TaoJie wrote:
Hi Bart,
I noticed this email just now :(
Thank you for your advice.
Are there any barrier instructions on x86/x64 could force the rdtsc to
behave sychronously?
iret, xchg, cpuid, sfence, lock, etc.
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, 陶捷 TaoJie wrote:
2007/12/22, Frank Hofmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Minskey Guo wrote:
On 2007-12-22, at 下午9:17, 陶捷 TaoJie wrote:
Hi Bart,
I noticed this email just now :(
Thank you for your advice.
Are there any barrier instructions on x86/x64
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, UNIX admin wrote:
[ ... ]
When I see something like that, I go through the roof. Probably because I
experience it every day, so I've grown extremely sensitive to it.
You wanted to help. The other guy was just trying to put the blame on someone
else hoping that the
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, UNIX admin wrote:
Hi,
Got an app that coredumps and the app developer is
blaming the O/S install as the problem. This is the
truss output (last part shown):
Incurred fault #6, FLTBOUNDS %pc = 0x0001C88C
siginfo: SIGSEGV SEGV_MAPERR addr=0xFF2707B0
Received
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Wayne Farris wrote:
Hi,
Got an app that coredumps and the app developer is blaming the O/S install as
the problem. This is the truss output (last part shown):
[ ... ]
Incurred fault #6, FLTBOUNDS %pc = 0x0001C88C
siginfo: SIGSEGV SEGV_MAPERR addr=0xFF2707B0
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Yi Kong wrote:
My Sunfire V440 rebooted with error:
www savecore: [ID 570001 auth.error] reboot after panic: BAD TRAP: type=31
rp=2a100d994c0 addr=0 mmu_fsr=0 occurred in module genunix due to a NULL
pointer dereference
Dec 12 15:25:43 www savecore: [ID 748169
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
Sometimes a large system, despite precautions (or
in the absence of them),
runs out of resources (VM, mainly) to the degree
that no useful progress
is being made: that is, one can't even log in
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's very simple, Joerg, first to integrate wins.
WRONG: in the OSS world the first user os a name wins and the imagemagick name
is thus illegal.
Says who? And who keeps the record or registry?
Do you like to ignore
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Vamsee Priya wrote:
Hi
I am trying to port a kernel module (which acts as a layer between VFS
and UFS) from Solaris sparc platform to Solaris x86 platform.
Interesting - which module/product is that ?
I am facing many kernel panics happening at different places.
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
Sometimes a large system, despite precautions (or in the absence of them),
runs out of resources (VM, mainly) to the degree that no useful progress
is being made: that is, one can't even log in and kill the hogging processes.
(At least on
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
Sometimes a large system, despite precautions (or in the absence of them),
runs out of resources (VM, mainly) to the degree that no useful progress
is being made: that is, one can't even log in and kill the hogging processes.
(At least on
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Cyril Plisko wrote:
On Dec 9, 2007 8:11 PM, Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The next question is how to create a single filesystem on a USB attached
device ( like a USB Stick from SanDisk or Kingston etc ) where the
filesystem is supported and read/write functional
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Josh Lange wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 1:25 AM, Zhang, Frank F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does Solaris has similar Linux command mount -o which can mount IMG
file with specified offset? Or if I can get an Utility to do this kind of
job?
Are you talking about mapping an
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, vineet kumar wrote:
Hi,
I am using SXCE build76.
i have a extended partition on my drive with 4 FAT32 volumes.
But I can mount only the first two.
a) How exactly are you trying to mount them, i.e. which device name
do you specify for the mount command ?
b) exactly
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Ajay Ramesh wrote:
I want to design folowing SAM in solaris please some body help me
My memory tells me that is a repeat request ...
Anyway, OpenSolaris is a software project. CPU design isn't exactly what
people here focus on, and/or have great expertise in...
It
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Alan Burlison wrote:
[ ... ]
Personally I don't know what the opinion of the community is on this
issue, mainly because the vast majority of the voting members choose to
keep quiet. All I see is a small number of voluble individuals stating
and restating their opinions
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 31/10/2007, Nikolay Molchanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not suggesting to change stdio, I'm suggesting to change pkgrm code to
use
read(0, buf, 1);
in loop to read 1 byte from standard input until the end of line or EOF
happens.
Basically it
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that 32-bit applications have no problem handling large files on
Solaris, so it's really more of an issue in run-time memory space than
anything else.
32bit Applications cannot access files with file
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, A. Stockinger wrote:
[ ... ]
For coexistence of Solaris and Linux there is no chance for only one Grub
screen, we need this
Grub hopping. Hope that helps you.
Don't quite understand that. I never found it a problem for Solais' grub
to boot my Linux installation, even
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, vijay wrote:
1. how to mount windows ntfs and fat32 drives in solaris11?
2. how to configure or start broadband connection in solaris11?
3. how to mount USB drives in solaris11?
Rob answered these.
4. while mounting Fat32 it gives I/O error
Does that also happen if
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry this is s10 but I thought someone here may have some idea about this
I just noticed (thanks to star complaining about missing links) that
numerous ( 2000) files on the s10u4 SPARC DVD seem anomalous.
# cd root of dvd
# ls -il
On Sun, 9 Sep 2007, John Weekley wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Mario Goebbels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, dumb question of the day: How do I actually install and use the precompiled
modules? I've dropped them (i86 and amd64) into the respective driver
directories, did rem_drv and add_drv,
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Dennis Clarke wrote:
[ ... ]
I expect that the first release of Indiana will change a lot of things and I
*hope* that bureaucratic modis operandi will be one of the things to slowly
slip away.
I hope for the same.
Although, as you say, changing code is the trivial part.
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Kaiwai Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So this is sketched out roughly, but no coding has started on this yet
(and, given my commitments changed, isn't going to start by myself any
time soon either).
Cool but in regards to how the FAT is read,
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, Lurie wrote:
Darn, too bad :( the speed is definitely not fantastic (3.8mb/s read vs
15-20mb/s in Linux for a usb flash stick) + the mem usage...
The change does nothing for the (non-)speed, unfortunately.
It does:
- enable access to 2kB secsize media (like video
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Fintan Ryan wrote:
Hi Folks,
This is great to see, I was playing with the binaries that were available
from August 14th a few days ago in order a new iPod nano, one question though
- is the code in the webrev substantially different from the code base that
the
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 13:46 -0700, Fintan Ryan wrote:
Hi Folks,
This is great to see, I was playing with the binaries that were
available from August 14th a few days ago in order a new iPod nano,
one question though - is the code in the webrev
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Fintan Ryan wrote:
This is great to see, I was playing with the binaries that were
available from August 14th a few days ago in order a new iPod nano,
one question though - is the code in the webrev substantially
different from the code base that the binaries from Aug
Hi,
this is a heads-up of a significant codechange about to go into PCFS.
I've put a webrev for the proposed change up at:
http://cr.grommit.com/~frankho/
Why is this big / significant ?
a) it provides most of the support for media with 2kB sectorsize
(the infamous my iPod isn't
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
[ ... acroread/UNIX blog ... ]
Setting up blogs mean jack if they don't actually produce some damn
results - damn I hate it when companies think that with a blog and a
few hollow words that they can create a so-called 'community'. Less
blathering
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ... ]
Anyway, the original problem I ran into is a simpler one: that hsfs will
detect a filesystem as hsfs without then also wanting to mount it.
That, of course, won't do.
Casper
Thanks for bringing it back to the topic :)
Can anyone
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, UNIX admin wrote:
I suggest people with issues take them to those lists
rather than air
them here.
Super. So:
- this is not a Solaris helpdesk
- Solaris 10 is not to be discussed here
- issues with OpenSolaris are not to be discussed here
What IS to be discussed
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some DVDs contain two filesystems [1], hence
mountable as either hsfs
and udfs. fstyp returns the first match, and that's
what HAL will use.
One fix would be to treat these in the same fashion
we treat hybrid
data+audio media, i.e. pop a
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Steven Sim wrote:
Gurus;
Is there a way, through the procfs of Solaris to determine whether the a
process has opened listening network ports?
Either using Perl or otherwise?
I know of a very iterative approach but if we apply the approach to all
the ports and the
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Orvar Korvar wrote:
# mount -F pcfs /dev/dsk/c2t0d0p0:c /mnt/tempMountPoint/
mount: I/O error
How strange. I am beginning to think that Ive missed something basic here.
If you have OpenSolaris (need around ~build 25), you can use the patches /
modules from:
Anyone willing to test the fix for that ?
There's more than one bug open against 2kB sector size support, in fact in
total there are five ... the one below among them.
FrankH.
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding the USB device problems. Stock Solaris has an open bug
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Orvar Korvar wrote:
fdisk lists a DOS-BIG partition. But
bash-3.00# mount -F pcfs /dev/dsk/c2t0d0p0 /mnt/tempMountPoint/
mount: I/O error
is the result.
You need to use /dev/dsk/c2t0d0p0:c - p0 is the whole disk, unpartitioned,
and _that_ contains no recognizable
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
[ ... ]
You may quote other people's work _without_ ever asking them for permission
in case
this is needed for your work and as long as your work has enough own
creation level
to make it a separate work.
That might or might not be correct given
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Nico Sabbi wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Nico Sabbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ... ]
This is opensolaris. If you like it, do it!
Jörg
you explained yourself that doing it is one thing, integrating
it in Opensolaris is a totally different thing that only the
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, amol wrote:
Hi,
I want to use the struct direct datastructure from the file ufs_fsdir.h -
just that
data structure in a proprietary code. I read the CDDL CDDL FAQ and i know I
am allowed to do that, but I am not sure how much source code I need to
release under
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Murugathasan Simon wrote:
Hi Anybody who can help?
logger(1) - the command should do exactly what you want ...
FrankH.
Regards
Simon
Simon Murugathasan
Customer Solution Architect
Central Architecture and Design, FPM
FUJITSU
Lovelace Road, Bracknell, Berks,
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Orvar Korvar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my opionion, Blastwave and the likes, should be high on Sun's priority list. It seems
that to compile a program under Solaris takes years of experience. Sun and you all guys
are doing a terrific job with
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, ÌÕœÝ Tao Jie wrote:
Dear all:
There're two lexical analyzer generator in Solaris/OpenSolaris
/usr/ccs/bin/lex
/usr/sfw/bin/flex
What's the difference between these 2 tools? Are they replaceable?
http://flex.sourceforge.net/manual/Lex-and-Posix.html#Lex-and-Posix
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
although I really like Opensolaris I find really hideous having the
terminal spit out control sequences
when hitting arrow keys and backspace instead of moving the cursor
(the only extra key that works correctly is Del, and it works backwards
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Lurie wrote:
The read speed of the same memory stick in linux is around 13mb/s, and
in Solaris it's barely 3.5mb/s, it seems to be a vfat issue though, as
if I format the drive with ufs it seems fast enough, but this isn't
really a solution as it loses its flexibility
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Martin Cerveny wrote:
Hello,
I've put a webrev of the so-far tested part of the
rewrite here:
http://cr.grommit.com/~frankho/webrev-pcfs/
if you're curious. There's far more to come,
trickling in ever so slowly.
Can you make webrev compare against ssh://[EMAIL
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
