as far as I know, noone promised anything, at least not publicly
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Michael Kerpan mjker...@kerpan.com wrote:
Now that the full version of S11 is beginning to ship, will we
finally see the long=promised code drop of new kernel code or has
Oracle decided to
if you inserted the disk that has the rpool in a different sata port,
you might have problems, yes
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Orvar Korvar
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:
PS. I removed the hard disk when I fastened the cpu cooler again, and then
inserted the SATA cable - but this
SATA does need an driver, the same eSATA uses actually
USB 3.0 also needs a driver which i dont think is available yet, at
least for solaris
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Orvar Korvar
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:
eSATA is a physical connector and electrical standard for SATA.
So you
you cannot use the whole disk for a zfs boot disk. the bios of the pc
understands only partitions and knows how to boot only from them
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Mike DeMarco mikej...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
I would check that your hardware is functioning
correctly by using these
opensolaris and solaris express use ZFS by default
fstab is a linux thing, in solaris its vfstab
check the AllowUsers option in sshd_config
check the man page of hosts_access to get tcpwrappers working in solaris
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:21 PM, ann kok oiyan...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Hello
How can
have you checked ps(1) ?
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:43 AM, dengning dunning2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi gurus,
I wrote a multithread application by pthread and bind the threads with
specific cpu cores by processor_bind(), now I am wanting to confirm if the
binding is effective. I wonder if
what do you need the root password for? the user created during the
install has a primary administrator profile which means he can use
pfexec to run everything as root
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Mike DeMarco mikej...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have installed the latest build but do not know the
Those news are 7 years old! things have changed since then
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Orvar Korvar
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:
IBM has publicly said that they are phasing out AIX in favour of Linux. AIX
will be killed. IBM has said that officially.
Here is links that confirm
Solaris 11 express is not even official. Oracle employees are very
likely not allowed to share details, sun's days where they could talk
about what was next are over
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Stephan Ferraro step...@ferraro.net wrote:
I'm curious to know how the migration from
http://blogs.sun.com/albertw/entry/ipfilter_logging
2010/8/18 Günther Schmidt gue.schm...@web.de:
Hi all,
I'd like to see what kind of network connection attempts are being made to
my box, what's the easiest way to do that?
Günther
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 8/16/2010 10:34 AM, Paul Gress wrote:
On 08/16/10 03:36 AM, Nikola M. wrote:
On 08/14/10 03:41 PM, Orvar Korvar wrote:
All source code will be available after binary update of Solaris 11
Express have been released. Then Illumos will have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 8/16/2010 12:14 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: Edward Ned Harvey [mailto:sh...@nedharvey.com]
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100815110101756
The points I'm taking away are:
* Google clearly understood they were entering
have you read the suit?
if oracle's lawers think android is somehow unlawfully affecting its
java assets, they have to sue, they have an obligation to their
shareholders, they paid quite a few billions for that after all
Sun would have had to do the same thing had their lawyers reached the
same
if your file landed in opensolaris, then you signed an SCA which means
you gave sun and now oracle rights akin ownership.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Richard L. Hamilton rlha...@smart.net wrote:
On Aug 13, 2010, at 16:39, Paul Gress wrote:
On 08/13/10 06:35 AM, andrew wrote:
I
can you reliably reproduce it?
can you do it in a more recent build such as b134? (its the latest /dev build)
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Peter koa...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
We are running on snv_111b, got crash
Jul 23 16:23:53 IRBOX341 ^Mpanic[cpu3]/thread=ff050a94b540:
Jul 23
I don' t know. I'm certain there isnt without paying oracle for support.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Peter koa...@hotmail.com wrote:
Yeah, actually I had another one server has the same crash, is there any
patch for this only? not a whole build?
I did some search, that it's noticed as a
it does
http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/cdrecord.html
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:58 PM, valrh...@gmail.com valrh...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, then, do tell me: does CDRecord support BluRay?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
fully gpl compliant? what do you mean?
If the driver being dropped is open source, you can always take the
source code and keep updating it outside ON. Several people already do
this
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:21 PM, russell str...@willows7.myzen.co.uk wrote:
With a community distro would it be
Why should sun have consulted the community about their business
decisions?. Opensolaris was their distro, their product, the code is
in their repository.
The most we could have done is clone the opensolaris respository
outside sun's firewalls and prevent the relevant changes to avoid
deleting the
if you're using the latest solaris 10 or opensolaris, you can use userquotas
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5461/gigaz?a=view
nacho
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Sendil sendil@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Currently I have 400+ users with quota set to 500MB limit. Currently the file
Francis, the thing is that you can register utf8 domains (which
include arabic ones) by registering their punnycode equivalent. Your
browser will do the translation
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote:
On 06/18/10 02:22 PM, Francis Lucero wrote:
I tried man -s
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punycode
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Francis Lucero
francisluc...@yahoo.com wrote:
Anyone knows hoa to register arabic domain in BIND DNS?
Thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Opensolaris next is frozen, it doesn't matter how many fasttracks were approved.
And perhaps, those fasttracks were actually fasttracks to begin with...
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:05 PM, russell str...@willows7.myzen.co.uk wrote:
Looking through http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/ there
there is stuff in /etc/nwam/
nwam is the new way in which solaris configures networking
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Sarah kho sarah@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
can you please let me know where does opensolaris keep network
configurations, is there some configuration file for them?
thanks.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:36 PM, bsd mascotgr...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'll wait for the hate messages after I post this.
I personally don't get the Solaris/OpenSolaris distributions. Sure, I
understand when Sun said that OpenSolaris was open source (although most of
it is released under binary
the tool you should have used is Live Upgrade (LU)
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Johanna Kidwell
johanna_kidw...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi, I have a box with Solaris 10 TX 10/09 installed with ZFS for the root
file system. I have another pool called zones mounted at /zone where I
install my
bugs.opensolaris.org is the old bug tracking system used by sun back
in the day solaris was not opensource
defects.opensolaris.org is a new system that was releases when
opensolaris the binary distribution was released. I'm assuming
migrating the bugs from the old system to the new system is not a
2010/3/21 Giovanni Tirloni gtirl...@sysdroid.com:
Hello Ignacio,
2010/3/21 Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com
bugs.opensolaris.org is the old bug tracking system used by sun back
in the day solaris was not opensource
Bugs reported to defects.opensolaris.org sometimes get migrated
There are no free patches for solaris 10
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Aidan Lawn aidanl...@gmail.com wrote:
I just found this out, I don't know if it was announced or not but its news
to me.
The official license can be read here:
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/popup.jsp?info=17
you probably need to restart the server after installing the
storage-server package in order for some of the relevant kernel
modules to load.
have you done that?
nacho
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Jeff Freeman
freeman.jeff...@verizon.net wrote:
I've just finished installing storage-server
if you're running opensolaris 2009.06, i'd day you're running a very
old version of opensolaris.
In a month time, in march, a new version will be released, in the mean
time, you can check what it should be like by running the dev version
of opensolaris. The procedure to upgrade to dev is
check
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5177/rge-7d?a=view
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2254/urtw-7d?a=view
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 5:43 PM, M. Gomez opensola...@redinem.com wrote:
What mean rge and urtw ?
the rtw is realtekwireless i guess? but why the u?
and rge what is r, g
it's a mailing list, not a bug tracking system, you do not mark anything here
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 5:59 PM, M. Gomez opensola...@redinem.com wrote:
another one thing... how can i mark this thread as SOLVED?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
there is not a separate solaris for 32 bit machines. just boot a 32 bit kernel
http://blogs.sun.com/alta/entry/boot_into_32_bit_kernel
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Tom Chen chento...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I need to test my 32 bit GLDv3 network driver. I have already tested the 64
check http://blogs.sun.com/gfaden/entry/trusted_extensions_in_opensolaris_2000
There are other relevant parts of the blog too you might want to read.
specially if you're willing to run the dev branch
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Karel Gardas karel.gar...@centrum.cz wrote:
Another powerful
this has to be in solaris 10 or opensolaris?
i dont know how advanced ai is in opensolaris, but i think it can be
easily solved in solaris 10
want clustering? use sun cluster software
want rapid server deployment, use jumpstart
want each server with it's own data? use an automounter and a central
beadm mount bename /mnt
2009/12/26 Thommy M. Malmström thommy.m.malmst...@gmail.com:
Copying back drm + i915 kernel modules from snv129
helped for me to make X
work again.
I suppose you mount snv129 to a temporary place when you do this copying? I
always forget how to do this, can you
perhaps you should integrate smake into jucr first and then have the
spec file for star BuildRequire it? and while you're at it, you can
place it in /usr where it should be?
nacho
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
ken mays
, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote:
perhaps you should integrate smake into jucr first and then have the
spec file for star BuildRequire it? and while you're at it, you can
place it in /usr where it should be?
Well
it's not how it works, read the related manual in docs.sun.com
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-3814/6mjcp0qp9?a=view
here is a hint, you'll need cfgadm
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Xavier Callejas xav...@wflogistics.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a Sun Fire X2270, I have enabled hot plug
pkg(5) seems to use a set of actions to define what and how to do
things, and they seem to be similar to plugins in that you just drop
the action file in a directory and things work.
check http://opensolaris.org/sc/src/pkg/gate/src/modules/actions/
does the plugin list get updated every action
you do not think the current state of the patching system in solaris
is just broken at the moment?
I feel your pain though, and i mostly agree with what you say. but i
think IPS can be improved to a point where it makes my and your life
easier.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:30 PM, UNIX admin
is there a kernwl dump in /var/crash/${hostname}
if there is that. try running the following command
mdb -k unix.n vmcore.n
where n is a number
after that run, in the prompt of mdb, run
$C
That should tell you where the kernel crashed and will give someone
more skilled than i am more
SUNWipkg pfexec pkg image-update -v
Then wait. Don't forget to read the release notes before starting out.
2009/12/6 Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com:
is there a kernwl dump in /var/crash/${hostname}
if there is that. try running the following command
mdb -k unix.n vmcore.n
where
Where did you find that? fishworks is the internal name of the Sun
storage 7000 family of products
http://www.sun.com/storage/disk_systems/unified_storage/
it has not and probably will never be opensource
nacho
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Henri Maddox
hendri.mad...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi
it is known
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/on-discuss/2009-November/001376.html
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org wrote:
Is this already a well know item or have I spotted a new creature crawling?
Executing last command: boot
Boot device: disk2:a
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Yannis Schoinas yan...@schoinas.net wrote:
Setup:
Linux client (Atom 330, 1GB d...@533) connects to Solaris server (Atom 330,
2GB d...@533)
Network connectivity through 100 Mbps MOCA link (3 msecs latency each
way)Solaris server exports the same filesystem
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Yannis Schoinas yan...@schoinas.net wrote:
I would expect both protocols to saturate the network. What are your
performance expectations for cifs?
CIFS performance is not limited by network BW or CPU performance (at this BW
level). Something else is causing
i dont think that's possible, solaris needs grub, and it needs solaris
grub, because it's the only one that understand zfs
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Emanuele Fontana geol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
this is a very newbie question, but I'd need a hint. My Hard Disk is
partitioned as
be careful with that dennis, read the original mail that script came from
http://archive.netbsd.se/?ml=opensolaris-codea=2007-12t=5919840
do they sell opensolaris stuff with jurgen's signature? :)
2009/10/4 Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org:
have you tried with dtrace?
es raro, te fijaste que tu maquina arranque del disco rigido virtual
una vez que instalaste el opensolaris?
2009/9/27 claudio de jesus alberto...@hotmail.com:
estoy instalando en virtual vox todo pasa bien el problema es que cuando
reinicio la maquina virtual tengo que instalar el Sistema
will we follow the trend and migrate from pidgin to what gnome uses these days?
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Calum Benson calum.ben...@sun.com wrote:
On 24 Sep 2009, at 19:12, Cyril Plisko wrote:
2009/9/24 Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com:
why is that?
WAG: Gnome 2.28
Hmm
why is that?
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:20 PM, ken mays maybird1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello,
For our OpenSolaris distributors, this release may be worth the wait. I think
we are in for a big suprise...
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss
check http://jucr.opensolaris.org/home/
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Nischal nischal@sun.com wrote:
Hi,
I have created a GUI application that is used to configure PPPoE connection.
Currently the project resides on the java.net website. Now I would like to
see this application in
uname doesnt report 32 bits because the output of uname is irrelevant for this
this is not linux, there are no separate 64 and 32 bit versions, there
is just one version, and the stuff that does not offer significant
benefits compiled in 64 bit mode is left as a 32 bit application
On Sat, Sep 19,
did you try removing the Xorg.conf file? X should autodetect most
settings these days
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Guruprasad lgp171...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I wrongly changed the screen resolution in OpenSolaris 2009.06 to an
unsupported one. Since then I have been unable to recover
check man find, it is explained there
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Davidedavide.castell...@yahoo.it wrote:
thank you,
can you tell me what does it mean {} + ?
can you suggest me a tutorial or an online manual for beginners?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
opensolaris has 2 application servers, tomcat and glassfish, eclipse
and netbeans are available as IDEs
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:18 PM, philo neophilippe.poncebl...@orange.fr wrote:
how inplementer j2ee in osol, which is the waiter d' application: tomcat,
jrun,… are what eclipe exists with
too early to tell
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:24 PM, John Jensenbsduse...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the future of OpenSolaris now that Oracle is taking over Sun? Is it
too early to tell yet?
I've been looking at alternative to MS OSs and am using OpenSolaris Live CD
right now. I must say I
boot with the livecd, import your pool and follow the workaround in here
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6664765
nacho
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:09 PM, vhizvahu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am in a bit of a situation. I am running OpenSolaris 2008.11 on
an
i'm not sure how cifs deals with roles, and root is a role in
opensolaris, can you try with another user?
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:56 AM, rudrorudro.chatter...@tcs.com wrote:
I am unable to share cifs share on open solaris with authentication from
windows machine. I followed the following
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Robert Milkowskimi...@task.gda.pl wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Fredrich Maney wrote:
2009/8/12 Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com:
-LU is now dead
I hadn't heard this. Is this just a temporary issue due to IPS not
supporting
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Glenn Lagasseglenn.laga...@sun.com wrote:
* Anon Y Mous (music_anal...@yahoo.com) wrote:
Did you try installing it on an Solaris Express Community Edition
(SXCE)? I suspect Oracle products run better on Solaris Express than
they do on OpenSolaris Indiana
is there a summary of the changes in indiana that have to go through arc?
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Che Kristoc...@opensolaris.org wrote:
I assume by the security issue you are reffering to
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1945
There is always the solaris cluster if you want true high availability
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ha-clusters/ohac/
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Jason Kingja...@ansipunx.net wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Brandon Barkerbrandon.bar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Brandon Barker
the dev branch of opensolaris has 3.5 i think
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Louis de
Silvalouis.desi...@team.telstra.com wrote:
hi all,
i'm looking for FireFox 3.5 for OpenSolaris. Could not find them on the
repository. Where can I find it and replace the one that comes with OSOL?
try reboot -f dryrun
after that check dmesg, that should tell you what driver has problems
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Gordongfreem...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm running svn_111b and my system will not enter suspend mode. Mobo is an
ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe, CPU is an AMD Athlon 64 and the video
with crossbow, i belive we have flowstat if flows were configured
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Harry Putnamrea...@newsguy.com wrote:
Sivakumar Shanmugasundaram sivaku...@sun.com
writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
What do we have for opensolaris that can display the amount of data
going through
use, the new
bfe driver doesnt work for me either and i filled a bug for it
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Jürgen Keiljrgn.k...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Gordongfreem...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm running svn_111b and my system
i stand corrected, i dont know why i thought it was required, i just
checked quiesce(9E) and it only talks about fast reboot
2009/7/15 John Martin john.m.mar...@sun.com:
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
Actually, that command checks whether the driver implements quiesce()
which is needed
have you tried booting from the live cd, importing the pool and
recreating the archive there?
nacho
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Benjamin
Feuchterbenjamin.feuch...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi all,
my OpenSolaris 2009.06 file server had an power outage this morning. Now on
restart I always get the
yes, a lot of us run solaris in dell, ibm and even whitebox servers.
if the hardware is more or less current, you should not have problems.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:14 PM, mattiasm...@mjw.se wrote:
i plan maybe to install solaris on a non solaris computer
are it possible
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Viktor Cemaskocema...@fibermail.hu wrote:
Greetings,
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 19:39:01 +0200, Tony Curtis tony_curti...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Is it possible to clean up in there?
Yep, you can delete all directories with hexadecimal names under
/var/pkg/download IF
you might want to learn about pfexec and RBAC in solaris, it is both
more powerful and better integrated than sudo in opensolaris
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:27 AM, philo
neophilippe.poncebl...@orange.fr wrote:
yes i have /rpool/boot/grub/menu.lst
---
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
sola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
I wonder if this is just something people design for and live with? Or if
perhaps there’s a better way to config my system, that somebody would care
to suggest?
I have the following ZFS filesystems:
/share
2009/5/24 Edward Ned Harvey sola...@nedharvey.com:
I believe samba has shadow copy support when the backing filesystem is
ZFS[1]
Also, solaris cifs server has support for shadow copies since build
106[2]
That is the way to go with CIFS if you're using Windows clients imho.
That would be
you cannot do that yet i think, but there is a related ARC case to add
the feature
http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/164/
nacho
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Iban Nieto iban.ni...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
How I can share ZFS/CIFS resources without password, with 'guest' in the
it seems like half my system was broken after this many upgrades (from
osol beta 2 to the latest dev)
and yes, i did hit the
Warning: package may contain bobcat! (http://xkcd.com/325/) message
:) nice guys
na...@saturn:/opt$ pfexec pkg fix
[..]
Created ZFS snapshot: 2009-04-23-04:41:23
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Hanma dante...@mail.ru wrote:
what kind of package there must be?
please, read a solaris manual.
SXCE packages are in SVR4 format, read pkgadd(1M), pkgrm(1M) for more
information
opensolaris 2008.11 are in pkg format, read pkg(5) for more information
--
This
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Edward Ned Harvey sola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
When I run uname -a it says:
SunOS hostname 5.10 Generic_137138-09 i86pc i386 i86pc
In the past, I've seen the system say x86_64 when you're 64bit. And I've
also seen it say 32bit when you're 32bit. But now it
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Lurie y...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
So modern Linux package managers do not have any of these qualities ?
Some of them ? Of course. All of them ? No. Just a few points:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Chip D. Panarchy forumanar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I am, some only recently, quite proficient with Windows XP, Windows Vista,
Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008, Windows 7, OpenSuSE, Fedora 10 and
Ubuntu.
I have all of the above Operating Systems
http://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/brand3493.htm
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:53 AM, M. Oliver Ghingold mega...@gmail.com wrote:
According to OpenGroup's website, Solaris 10 for x86_64 systems was never
registered with the OpenGroup for Unix 03 certification. No version of
OpenSolaris
Authorizations are part of the RBAC framework in solaris, you might
want to start reading there
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Hanma dante...@mail.ru wrote:
I can't understand what to do to authorise the user. I can't understand this
-A authorization
One or more comma separated
if your user is called hanma you need to write
passwd hanma
you should really start thinking about getting a basic unix manual all
these things are covered there
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Hanma dante...@mail.ru wrote:
can you write me an example?
--
This message posted from
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:00 AM, MD mapoubell...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hi all,
I saw that Sun is providing to Hypervisors :
- xVM (not released, in beta, a fork from Xen on Solaris 10)
- Ldom : But I can't find clear informations about it :
Does Ldom runs on x86 and Sparc CPU ?
Does Ldom only
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Glenn Fowler g...@research.att.com wrote:
J?rg, I don't recall if you were at the 1986 Denver usenix discussions that
yielded pax, but the rancor of the tar/cpio discussions up to that point
made it
And what happened after the review was aprobed exactly? were test
packages provided? someone at sun checked them for compliance and code
review? why? why not?
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com
, Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote:
And what happened after the review was aprobed exactly? were test
packages provided? someone at sun checked them for compliance and code
review? why? why not?
Jörg is only interested in trolling and vaporware announcements. He's
never
SMC and smcwebserver were eoled if i recall corectly
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 1:43 PM, mike m...@mercuryrising.net wrote:
Is there a reason these packages are only included on the DVD image, and not
through one of the dev/release repositories?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
you're not supposed to roll back like that, when you upgrade from one
build to the next, the process creates a new boot environment (BE) and
updates that instead, if you need to go back to how the things were
before updating just reboot into the old BE.
You can create BEs outside the update
beadm does all the cloning for you, it even adds an entry to grub
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:18 PM, stephan.ferraro
stephan.ferr...@trashmail.net wrote:
Am 10.03.2009 um 23:02 schrieb Ignacio Marambio Catán:
you're not supposed to roll back like that, when you upgrade from one
build
VM2.0? it's not the first time i've heard something like that, is
there any information about it?
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Bart Smaalders bart.smaald...@sun.com wrote:
Marion Hakanson wrote:
erva...@gmail.com said:
When the system is largly idle the gnome desktop feels fast and
Those were the rumors i was talking about
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Bart Smaalders bart.smaald...@sun.com wrote:
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
VM2.0? it's not the first time i've heard something like that, is
there any information about it?
http://osdir.com/ml
i'll ask before filling a bug, has anyone seen powertop return something like
na...@saturn:~$ pfexec powertop
OpenSolaris PowerTOP version 1.1 (C) 2008 Intel Corporation
powertop: ../cpufreq.c : cpu-change-speed probe unavailable
Collecting data for 5.00 second(s)
After that all i see is
Sun owns the CDDL code you're talking about. They do not have the
obligation to distribute the code even if it changes the CDDL's code
they own
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Robert Milkowski mi...@task.gda.pl wrote:
Hello Brian,
Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 4:34:22 PM, you wrote:
BU So,
How exactly? by modifying the gnu tools? including some gnu and some
solaris tools where the later do not challenge the familiarity? or
modifying solaris' tools?
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:51 PM, david.co...@sun.com wrote:
i'm surprised that gnu chmod is installed, what are the advantages
check whether the zfs filesystem that has your /opt is mounted, I'm
sure it isnt
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Dieter Kluenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have upgraded to
OpenSolaris 2008.11 snv_101b_rc2 X86
Now my /opt directory is empty, that is, the mountpoint /opt is
available
whats the output of zfs getprop rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-5/opt ?
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Dieter Kluenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dieter Kluenter wrote:
Hi,
I have upgraded to
OpenSolaris 2008.11 snv_101b_rc2 X86
Now my /opt directory is
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Dieter Kluenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ignacio Marambio Catán [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
whats the output of zfs getprop rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-5/opt ?
I love top quoting :-(
But still
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ zfs getprop rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-5/opt
1 - 100 of 305 matches
Mail list logo
